Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Muslim. Show all posts

Monday, March 31, 2014

"Where is Allah?" videos

I had a few questions for a Sheikh, Mumtaz ul Haq. But as I don't have his official channel, or email I just posted it at a sharing site, where maybe someone will pass it on, because they are the Hanafi channel, according to them, and probably they can help me out. Also, there is a lot of debate among some about the need to follow a particular school as opposed to the hadiths only. What I think is that when a Muslim doesn't follow a particular school, still they learn to pray and do the other obligations and learn the aqeeda, etc. from scholars. I studied and so do many others at schools, which may teach Islam by following a curriculum; if the curriculum is decided by following one of the madhabs isn't a problem, and each madhab has scholars or teachers who at least know something about what the other madhabs (of which he isn't a follower) also teach. Not all the teachers are experts in religion, some are more like dais but if they don't know, they ask another more qualified teacher or scholar and help the students with their questions. In an ideal world we would all have the opportunities to study with many different scholars and learn the difference between all the different madhabs before we decide if we want to have a madhab or which madhab to follow. 
********
Sometimes, one has to admit that there is no way to know everything, and without proof, or without knowledge especially, we should admit that we just don't know (about something).
It is wrong to accuse others of insincerity, however.
I hope people will be more aware of how they address questions of religious differences, even if the people or group you are speaking about or criticizing are wrong or astray.
Do not use the word "salafist" because it is just a label and doesn't mean anything in Arabic or in Islam. And don't say that Muslims who are saying wrong things or teaching wrong or deviant ideas are "salafis" (from the Arabic word for salafi, in the plural form, or meaning people who follow the salaf, the early Muslims.)
'Salafis' are supposed to follow the Messenger, pbuh, and the example of the early Muslims, too.
Salafi is not a school of thought, so speaking about "salafis" and comparing them to "hanafis" is like comparing apples and oranges.
There are four schools of thought, the hanafi, hanbali, maaliki, and shafii, they are all Muslims and the early scholars after which these madhabs were named were also salafi.
Do we need to call ourselves other than Muslims, even if we have a school of thought or if we only ask the scholars for their advice when we don't know?
I call myself Muslim and don't feel the need to follow a particular madhab/school, but I understand why others do, and I don't think it is wrong at all to do so.
And Allah knows best about this and related matters. May He guide us all to what is just.




 Can I ask, if someone can ask the Sheikh Mumtaz ul Haq also about the verse he mentions, which is "Allah Istawa ala'al arsh, yudabiru al amr." Thank you for the video. Does this verse mean, turn-ing to the arsh, okay I understand; what is the word to say when the Muslims turned their qibla to another qibla? is it istawa or something else? Jazakum Allah. And finally, to istawa ala'a samaa (to "turn to the sky") doesn't it actually translate better as "established Himself above the throne" (the verse being, “istawa a’ala al arsh”, I should say) which is how I have always heard it translated? Not 'on' but 'above', just as He, SWT, is above everything, or also above the heavens and above us? Jazakum Allah. Allah bless the Sheikh and also the uploader.

Can I ask, again - that the hadiths say that there is a great distance between the different levels of the heavens, some people will be in the highest level, others will be in other levels, the highest being Firdaus al a'ala. Also, ahadith mention that the distance between the different levels, is like we look at the stars in the sky, or in space, or like so many years (away), e.g. 50,000 years - I no longer remember the description in a time sense. Is it not only a meaning of being in a more special or honored place. Is this the case; that maybe there is a physical or a time/space meaning also? Then we should perhaps only say that God knows whether or not it is in a physical sense or only in the sense of "degrees of honor". Can you tell the wording in Arabic or English so we can understand about the hadith mentioning the distance between the different heavens? I am being sincere. Jazakum Allah khairun.
#ilm   #asking   #Allah  [revised]

Where is Allah? He is "stawa a'ala al arsh" and I believe that, even if I don't understand what it means or how it is best translated.

What is the Sunnah wa al Jamah? What do they say about Allah?


I'm not finished reading the material on this site but it seems to be a good one.
Insha Allah I will revise or add a comment, if there is anything which doesn't seem to be right with the site, or if I hear anything about the site from others, either positive or negative.


The video is Where is Allah? by Sheikh Mumtaz ul Haq, which is easy to search. And there are other good videos with similar names, but you have to be careful about some of the channels, or also the opinions expressed by some in the comments sections of these video channels.

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Little Red & Islam Means "Love" - Part 2

(Zaha S, says)

Ummm first and foremost Allah is Arabic for God and lol I don't think you fully understand the meaning of "Islamophobe". I don't agree with these terrorist groups and most good pious Muslims don't either but they have power, money, and believe it or not the Western governments backing them up so there is not much we can do except use our voices. The only spread of Islam you're talking about is peaceful just like Mormons or Jehovah's witness' at your door on a Sunday morning except even less. Honestly the only thing I'm really concerned about is people looking at weird groups or countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia as models of Islam and thats the opposite no country on earth is representing Islam correctly unfortunately. So please please please as a fellow human being talk to a Muslim about our way of life, don't gather info from Islamophobe sites or people. Happy Turkey Day :)

terente P , says:

+Zaha S

no matter what allah in arabic means! its about what are the properties of that allah and they indicate satan, not god. if that what arabs understand as god its actually satan, then is satan their god! worshipers of satan = muslims

you take the arabic meaning of god but tell further down saudi arabia is a weird country :))

you claim there are only some bad examples, but you cant mention a single islamic country where islam isnt bullshit - islam isnt peaceful, no matter which country we take as example

-honour killings

-minor marriages

-death penalties for homosexuality, sex outside marriage, apostates

-slavery

-oppression of women generally

....

we dont need spreading of islam!


Zaha S

Nov 29, 2013  
"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God). Yeah exactly there are no countries where Islamic law is practiced correctly. And it really does make me mad because there are extremist groups who are absolutely horrid, very UnIslamic, and they oppress all those around them and people who aren't Muslim get the wrong idea. All those supposed "properties" of Islam you mentioned are not Islamic at all they are cultural. I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God) because Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land and inherit WAAY before the West did. Like I said a lot of what you said is cultural like honor killings, minor marriages, it is true that homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death . Slavery is also forbidden in Islam. I could go on this makes me so sad that you're so misinformed. If you don't like peace then so be it but please refrain from criticizing my way of life. I love all of God's creation and so I do care that you understand Islam correctly."



terente P

Nov 30, 2013  

you are the one who is totaly misinformed about islam if you claim that would be cultural and not islamic!

"homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death"

I can show you fatwas which tell that homosexuality and apostasy must be punished by death. and even if it would be only forbiden, why should it be forbiden? that reveals the intolerant and totalitary character of islam!

"Slavery is also forbidden in Islam."

Qatar is treating their guest workers like slaves and also in every islamic country there is slavery. all that is according to sharia, the jurisdiction in islam (from allah)

and what kind of filthy culture is that, which includes all that atrocities? thats no culture! its coming from that filthy book, quran

"Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land"

dont tell bullshit! women arent allowed to vote in islamic countries, nor to divorce. all that rights are given to you by our democracy, our human rights in the west! you have nothing like that in islam! where did you get all that rights in islam if you already claimed that no islamic country practice it correctly? YOU LIE, LIKE EVERY MUSLIM BEING GAME OVER! :))

and how is looking that correct islam, if it isnt practiced anyplace?

"refrain from criticizing my way of life"

so far your way of life interfere mine, not only that i will criticize,but I also fight it!

"I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God)"

why thank god? that means you see yourself as something better than those who arent mulsims. that is muslim infatuation!

"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God)"

no, it isnt, because the quran's god is satan
you worship satan when you pray every day

"If you don't like peace..."

islam doesnt know peace! islam is obediance, oppression, violence, hate, submission, conquest, ....

stop spreading that filthy cult around the world! nobody like muslims, there are everywhere problems with them. if you dont put and end peacefully to that insanity of an illiterate pedophile sik man from 1440yrs ago, we will have to put an end, no matter what we have to do for that. we have to protect our cultures and our future from that threat called islam!



tvee

Nov 30, 2013

+Zaha S You are absolutely right! Your comments are refreshing and enlightening. You are obviously a person who values PEACE and LOVE amongst ALL people. I'd like to know your opinion about 2 question I have - Wasn't Islam as practiced during the early years of the Prophet Mohammed influenced by the Arabian tribal and cultural traditions and values of the people at that time? Beheadings for some crimes? Honor punishments? chopping of limbs? Are beheadings and cutting of limbs for punishment mentioned in the Quran? 2nd question - in your opinion, which Islamic country today comes CLOSEST to being truly Islamic? I know you said there are none, but the closest (even if it is a far shot)?



Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

+tvee Hey thanks, and its nice to meet someone with the same values regardless of their background and who they are! During the early years of Islam Prophet Muhammed and his few but growing followers were looked down upon, beaten, tortured, for their differing views which were going against what you're talking about plus to give charity to the needy, stop worshipping idols, abolish slavery etcc. Killing is not mentioned in the Quran unless it is in self defense, in time of war, or if someone has committed murder and proven guilty. The punishments mentioned for doing something forbidden can differ from lashings to prison time depending and then they are forgiven just as God is all forgiving. These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices. Personally I'm a Libyan-American and I haven't seen any good Islamic countries and the biggest reason is culture. I know this because I've met the best practicing Muslims here in the states, and its because they don't have that culture to influence them. Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West and 3/4 of those reverting are women. Nice talking, as long as you don't insult what I believe in then I respect you and your views :)



I have to stop here, and note some important details in point form, because there are so many!!

Zaha uses modern colloquialisms, often punishments are “horrid”; “random fact”, Etc. So I know for a fact she is a “girl”. I called her a “little girl” which she took offence at, but at least she didn’t get called worse names. So I’m not a nice person, sue me!! But the point being, I believe she is a “little girl”. It isn’t a crime to make a character judgment on the internet, even she should know that internet is impersonal and therefore, I can make judgments as I see fit. I didn't say it just to get a rise out of her, that would have been trolling. I don't do much of that.

Did I ever claim to be a nice person, or very nice? Does that matter in a debate which only requires facts? FACTS are what COUNT> being nice doesn’t mean a thing. Obviously, Terente P doesn’t care that Zaha wants “to be his friend”, and “cares about him” (my words).

The two people who do care about being friends are Zaha and Mr. T (tvee) because they have found allies in their fight for “peace”. Their peace initiative is however built on sand and not a rock, and in the real world, would fall, because you can’t have lasting peace or love built on lies.

Zaha mentions, punishments from lashings to prison time, “depending”. She is talking about serious punishments for serious crimes. But there is lashing for “fornication” and lashing for “slandering people” but if the slander amounts to accusing someone of adultery, the punishment will be flogging and the person's total humiliation - their word would never be any good, and that is something very dishonorable in Islam! Islam doesn’t permit slandering “good or chaste women” it says in the Quran. The Quran specifically mentions this sin, and especially about women, though it is the same whether a man or woman is wrongly accused.

Zaha doesn’t give specifics, okay fine. But she does then say, that “lashings and prison time” are the punishments, and that there aren’t “beheadings” or “killing” except for (we are talking about punishments not war, here) “MURDER” only. She doesn’t know or doesn’t agree that Islam punishes homosexuality (or there are examples of this in the hadiths) and adultery (the married person committing fornication, not a single person - even if he or she has sex with a married person)

I’m not going to discuss sharia more than this, just to be clear. But it is true there are examples in the traditions or hadiths/sayings, that homosexuals should be thrown off a cliff or killed e.g. stoned, I imagine. I would have to review that. (Since stoning is the lot of an adulterer I imagine it is one way to punish homosexuality which is just a different kind of “illegal sex which is forbidden” But the reason homosexuality deserves death is because “if adultery is forbidden, so is homosexuality forbidden forever” (my own words). There is no marriage in Islam between gays or lesbians, so the marriage amounts to fornication, if the ppl are unmarried or adultery if a married man or woman is having a sexual relation with another person , even if they are divorced, and not married anymore) Anyway, facts are facts. This doesn’t mean there is a lot of killing of homosexuals today however, because there are not so many ppl in Saudi or Iran “coming out” or practicing a homosexual lifestyle in plain view of the government. (That would be suicide, which is also forbidden, lol. Sorry for the moment of brevity about an important topic, FOS) Homosexuality is a worse crime than mere fornication, so that is again why it is punishable by death. Fornication between single men and women isn’t punishable by death.

Here I will just add also that I don’t believe there are very many homosexuals in the Gulf States, but for sure not many in Saudi Arabia and certainly they don’t practice openly. (In Mecca there are not homosexuals practicing openly, that is really unimaginable to me. So I say it’s impossible) However, there are openly gay or transvestites, at least, in Bahrain. Bahrain is a small island country with a monarch, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifah. It has a border crossing (a bridge) with Saudi Arabia, and many Saudis also arrive in the Kingdom every week for visits or shopping, etc.

If someone is homosexual I don’t think they would dare practice their lifestyle in public in Saudi, they are gay not stupid. Also, if they come to Saudi for work or are in the armed forces or navy and visit the city of Riyadh, or other places, they probably should keep a low profile. That’s my advice, but I’m sure these men and women know that. They receive all kinds of cultural training, so much so that Western or European women even often wear a veil or some completely cover, as you can see one elderly woman on YouTube™ do.

Also, whether one is gay or straight, they should follow the law, or they risk punishment, which in case of drug offences, drinking in public, or other, are strictly illegal and could mean jail time, deportation, or maybe even worse. The government does often forgive criminals or release them to go home after they have served some of their sentence or paid fines. If not, then after they have served a full sentence. There might also be capital punishment for some foreigners, but I don’t recall specific cases. It is something I could research; I saw one documentary about a murderer, who was serving jail time, of twenty five years maybe, for murdering his Saudi sponsor. He says he accepted Islam in prison, so maybe he did that sincerely, and isn’t being killed, or he did it to avoid a more severe punishment and is not really Muslim, but I shouldn’t speculate on that.

She also talks about sitting in the back seat instead of in the front with the man who is driving her, because she isn’t permitted to drive. And she knows that his wife would not like also if he had a woman sitting in the front with him. She doesn’t say that it makes her feel second class however, that’s just how it is there. And as a “guest” of the Kingdom, she respects the culture enough to follow the social norms and also the law of the country.



terente P

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S "These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices."

you still aren’t able to answer what kind of culture is that!? i never heard that beheadings and killings can be seen as culture...

"Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesn’t mean its autmaticaly good

and that’s only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldn’t be like that, there wouldn’t be convertions!

and why should be forced islam to grow like that? don’t you have repect for other religion?
there are a lot of questions you have no answer and put your islam in bad view. but you ignore it, like every shameless muslim i have met until now...


What I think:

I have to differ with terente P as well on some points:

Islam isn’t a culture without a religion and religion takes precedence, even though cultural differences aren’t all discouraged. So yes, the punishments are dictated by the religion when we are speaking about sharia. But there are cultural “beheadings and honor killings” which we hear about sometimes on the news, as well. IN fact, “honor killings” are purely a cultural practice and have no sanction in Islamic law, because “honor killings” are always done by the family and usually punish women or girls who might be falsely accused, or a young unmarried couple in love, who also do not deserve death or “honor killing” by stoning or any other way. Previously unmarried men and women or youth are not ever killed in Islam. So, it is being done in Muslim majority countries but is even forbidden by Islam. No one is to be killed except in four cases e.g. adultery, intentional murder (or a planned murder), homosexuality and apostasy, and Allah knows best. These are the four mentioned in the Quran specifically. That doesn’t mean that drug dealers for example, are also not likely to be beheaded or executed, because they also are “killing people” by selling and spreading narcotics. Rape is also a capital crime, and the criminal is punished, not the victim.

The fact that someone argues against culture just because it is different is not okay, in my opinion. There are many diverse cultures around the world, and this is a beautiful thing. Therefore, the evil practices are the problem. But some cultural norms appear good in one culture and would appear the opposite in another culture. So, it isn’t always easy to tell, what is good and what is evil, is it? Isn’t it sometimes the opinion of a person and not really the majority opinion? For one, the reason that referendums are held is to determine what the public wants. Sometimes, cessation looks fine to many residents, but overall, the vote is in favor of not ceseding, as happened in Quebec , and also countries in the EU have had similar type referendums about joining the European Union, or about adopting one currency, the Euro. And so on. " Sometimes, the government or senate decides what is good. These are made using their onw judgement and by majority rule, but doesn’t mean they are right. Or right for everybody just because you think they are good. Maybe they are the worst thing. Interest isn’t permitted in Islam but the non-Muslim nations think interest is a good way to make money without having to work for it, because that’s what interest amounts to, money which you get on top of your capital (which you did work for). In Islam, interest is compared to incest with one’s mother. It is considered one of the worst things around because it doesn’t create wealth or bring blessings but destroys wealth and economies.

To quote Terente again,

‘“Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesnt mean its autmaticaly good

and thats only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldnt be like that, there wouldnt be convertions!’

He believes propagating one’s religion is evil, but we are not talking about forced conversions. His opinion is that it is not good and he equates freedom of religion and free speech practiced by Muslims (when they preach openly in public) as a kind of hate crime, but many people would defend the idea that speaking about one’s religion, as happens in London a lot, in the street Dawa, or he mentions CAIR defending Islam, is free speech, and should be permitted. These are opinions, but there is also the matter of the law, which may permit preaching in public. So far, we haven’t seen Muslims arrested in London for only preaching a peaceful message. Whether one believes Islam is really peaceful or not is not the only question. And there is no court in Britain or America that has ruled Islam as a violent and intolerant religion. Douglas Murray and others say it is, and their freedom of speech has not been curtailed either. But Islam has not been banned in Europe or the West. So Muslims are not breaking the law by practicing their freedom of speech right or associating with Islamic groups, like CAIR. If that will always be the case of if the nature of some groups changes in the future is another question.


Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

What in the world do you mean what culture is that? Its apart of a terrible cultural practice in the Middle East I thought that was already established. Yes it is something good because it is my way of life and I see it as beautiful and peaceful and if more people embrace that lifestyle then that makes me happy. What propaganda? I'm still itching my head at your ignorance; I don't think you're an idiot though, just misinformed. There is no such thing as forced Islam and most reverts find Islam on their own. Ask me anything, what did I ignore? I apologize if I ignored anything.

She says he is misinformed but not an idiot – that’s nice of her. In fact, she is so nice, that she can’t say anything which would hurt someone’s feelings, so she doesn’t want to tell the truth, which is that there are “beheadings” sometimes a lot, but especially in Iran or “killings” especially in Iran. Also, Saudi Arabia Kills murderers and adulterers, or stones them, which is the same thing, in the end. It is not something we want to happen to anyone, but is the punishment for those crimes, per the sharia. People know that these punishments exist, and in Islam IF ONE DOESN”T KNOW THE PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME< the he is not punished with it. That is COMPLETELY TRUE. I will even swear, it. Islam doesn’t punish someone for adultery if he says he didn’t know that the punishment for adultery existed. The judge is supposed to ask the person if he understands what he did, and if he knew that there is a punishment for it, e.g. did he know if he committed adultery he should be stoned??And KILLED??

If someone claims they didn’t know, and the judge believes them (there is no proof he did know), then he is let go. But the next time, he won’t be as lucky, unless he can prove next time that he forgot, and has a memory loss, which would need a doctor’s witness.

This means, not everything is as “obvious” as one imagines, or that not as many kilings are occurring as one might imagine should be occurring. Yes, a lot of adultery, but the punishments are not as many as the actual cases of adultery. I know this is true, because adultery must be proven with four witnesses, and this is discussed elsewhere in my blog. (I’ll try to leave a link).

Zaha has no problem with saying the Middle East has a culture that permits people to behave horridly. It isn’t about Islam, she says. So, insulting Middle Easter culture is okay, blaming Islam for “beheadings” is wrong.

Whatever one believes about beheadings, they are legal punishments carried out in Muslim countries, like Saudi Arabia and Iran. You can agree or disagree with the laws of other countries, but don’t lie that they don’t exist, or worse, say that the Quran doesn’t permit it. Also, it isn’t only Arab or Middle Eastern or even Muslim majority states which have capital punishment, beheadings might take place as well, certainly hangings are still practiced, and lethal injections and even firing squad are used in different places.

There are no legal slaves in the Middle East or the Gulf States. But I also would be cautious not to say that slavery is “forbidden” because the Quran doesn’t say that. It isn’t permitted in Islam however, to make a free Muslim person a slave. It isn’t permitted to take a Muslim who is already a free person, as a slave. He might have been a slave before, but once he has purchased his freedom or been emancipated by his owner or another person, he is free for the rest of his life. (If a non-believer takes him as a slave, is also something which would have to be discussed separately, but probably Muslims would really look down on a non-believer who takes a free Muslim or person as a slave, but that is what used to happen in the past to people.)

tvee

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S Thanks for your reply and explanation. I read an article in my local newspapers a few months ago, stating that a Muslim organization used an index based on (equality, freedom, etc) to gauge how compliant countries are to Sharia laws and surprisingly they have rated some countries (in Europe and the West) as more Sharia compliant than some Islamic countries. It was interesting. The study was meant as a wake up call to some Muslim countries to do more to tackle poverty, injustice, equality, etc in their countries. I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

There are no Muslims who call themselves Wahabis, this is a misnomer. It is a way to label Sunni Muslims, who are the majority, by the way. Sufis are not hurting anybody, but they are not following Islam as the majority either. You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends, who are all Sunnis. I don't have a problem with someone who practices how he wants but it isn't right to demonize the majority because you don't know Muslims well. Of course you believe so called Salafists or Wahabis are bad, because you believe everything you read about Islam (for the most part) is in the media. You can find many, many Sunnis on the internet and ask them their opinions about issues, and you will find that they also believe in live and let live. They are not out to get you or to Islamize the entire world. We are not ordered to turn everyone into Muslims against their will, it is a small majority of Muslims who actually think like that, or in terms of us and you. Also, I have Turkish women friends and they are just like me and my other friends; they care about the same issues that other Sunnis do. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

By the way, labeliing the majority of Sunnis as "salafist" or "wahabis" is starting to border on hate speech. Sunnis and Sufis all call themselves Muslims, and hardly do they get into discussions about their differences, except as an educational exercise. We are very united in our views and aspirations, but appear to be disunited; the media perpetrates the appearance of great schisms, which don't really exist (or result in disunity) among Muslims in their daily relationships with each other.

I should have siad, it is already at the point where labeling of sunnis occurs, and it borders on hate speech. This is something that has to be addressed in a public sphere. I wish more is said by othes about this problem.

In some previous statements by tvee, which are intersting, quoting a study, he mentions that a study showed that sharia is being practiced more in non-Muslim countries, and the index Does this mean that sharia is good, or that the West is more Islamic only? It appears that the fact that Western or European countries (according to what tvee explains) are more sharia compliant and therefore, also better. This is actually a good sign, then. I would tell +terente P to consider this part of +tvee ‘s remark before saying that Islam is “evil” ( my wording) or anything of that sort.

Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+terente P when you discuss so many facets of the religion in one breath, it is going to confuse. There are punishments for crimes, as you say, but a few countries are punishing some of these criminals, and it is in the Shariah, yes. However, that has nothing to do with the fact that Islam has spread to the West and many people believe in it. Arguing about the right or wrong of the religion isn't going to stop ppl from embracing it. Obviously they think it is good or they wouldn't accept it. The sharia is Islamic law and I don't have to apologize on behalf of Muslim countries which practice it. Yes, you can discuss anything because the internet permits you to. That doesn't mean that you are correct. Anyway, you should not take the spread of Islam as a personal insult. It seems you don't know Muslims well enough to have such a bad opinion of them. +terente P


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

Why do you want to be afraid of anybody, e.g. you say you are an islamophobe and what's wrong with that? +terente P Plenty, I think.


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+Zaha S could you review some of your previous comments, and think about revising? If you are a pious person, you should not say things which are not in accordance with your professed religion. If you are ignorant of your religion, you should learn more about it. You can comment freely to my discussion and I appreciate comments. But do be careful on the net how you frame your discussions. People are very conscious of Islam's power and also wary of it. We should always say what is right, no matter if ppl don't like it or even fight us about it. That is real freedom, not cowering under pressure of some islamophobes and hiding behind false platitudes. +tvee +terente P

Here I merely asked Zaha if she could review some of her comments. Hardly is that rude. Then “think about revising”. Hardly rude. I explain what is real freedom, “not hiding behind false platitudes”. Yes, I accuse her of that,because that’s what she did in her comments. Hiding and denying FACTS. The Qur’an is a book, it is available to read, and all the people know what it says, or they can certainly find a copy and research it.

tvee

Dec 4, 2013

Reply

+Jane Dughatir Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself and read my previous post carefully before asking anyone to "..be care on the net how u frame your discussions." I am well aware that most Muslims are Sunnis (85%), but there are Sunnis who follow a more fundamentalist sects/movements like Wahhabism & Salafism. There are Sufis in both Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam. I never once said Sufis are not Sunnis. I'm well aware that Sufi Muslims are not the majority of the total Muslim population, but they are a significant minority especially in a few Muslim nations. "You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 5, 2013
+tvee I'm sure I was speaking to the other person Zaha S, but just included you as a plus one, sorry for the confusion, or if I made a mistake when I posted the comment. Peace.

(I thought that, first, but then answered him back. However, one or more post/s for Zaha also included a plus and his name, just to allow him to see the discussion; the comment about being careful how she frames the discussion was only meant for her, though I figured the others could also benefit from reading that. It was only in the comment for her and not in a comment for him. Maybe that’s why I got confused about his reply which included my comment to her and not just the comment about his remark, “Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself nd read my previous post carefull”, was his reaction to my telling Zaha to “be careful how she frames her discussion”.

But I did read and understand his post - Which I will explain now in more details.

He greatly implies that Sufis are good Muslims, etc, but then says I shouldn’t say that he said Sufis are “nice”.??!! WHY?? He is also angry that I say he says Sufis are better than Sunnis, who (many of them) follow a sect or movement which is “fundamentalist” (direct quote – “more fundamentalist” read as “extremist”)

To quote him again, “.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.

Now the previous post he made, which has the comments I objected to originally:

"I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)"

He (tvee) said the sufis are the best, right HERE (in the parag above and this one, which are his own words). The Only Islamic tradition he is bolstering in his comment (above) is the Sufi tradition. I was not direct quoting him, even when I said “NICE” and it was just a short paraphrase (so I should have left the quotes out) HE wrote, “The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread” He wrote the above to Zaha, not to me. He praises her highly, “That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE…” blah -blah -blah.

He really means it should be spread, because it has always remained in part of the Islamic world, so it doesn’t need reviving but only spreading. He wishes to have Sufism (so called “Islamic tradition” spread) dominate the Muslim world. To burst his bubble, that isn’t ever going to happen, and thank Allah!! A group (or government even) of sufis will do nothing to bring peace all over the world any more than anyone else can, and they have no practical solutions to offer that aren’t already offered by the sharia. Sharia is the only way to ensure that all people have basic human rights, if it is spread. Sufism isn’t going to spread, so we have to concentrate our efforts on teaching Islam properly, so that it does acquire the recognition and respect it deserves. Islam is the Truth and it is good. I hate to be too preachy here, but that is now my only answer to +Tvee, who abandoned the conversation, after calling me a kafir, lol.


I said: 

Dec 5, 2013

Yes, you implied that sufis are "kind" and so on, while the majority are then not. That's how your comment came off to me, and probably a lot of people would agree if they read it. That's the way I took it because of how you wrote it. So I'm not apologizing for that.I'm not trying to be arrogant, just telling how I see your comment. +tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, which [sic] you by the way gave a lot of praise for, so clearly you are not as educated about what Islam teaches as you are pretending. You both came off as a pair of ignorants, that's my opinion. How you wrote it, comes off as ignorant, all of it. And some of it proves that you are ignorant.

I should have "tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, [whom] you by the way gave a lot of praise for..." but I think its pretty obvious, just a slight error. (Revised - Dec. 7th)

Zaha S, asks:

Yesterday 12:15 AM
"What exactly am I being ignorant about?"

I will end Part Two here, and get back to Zaha's question in Part 3. Also, I will leave this thought, I don't believe what she believes about the sharia, and I don't believe that everyone's perception is another's  illusion. And obvious "truth stands out clear from error" (quran) Truth is not untruth, that  is just nonsense.
 
 And why bolster Sufism alone, there are good Sunnis, many of them (and I am not disputing the claim that most Sufis or even a good majority are Sunnis - they have many strange practices, but for the moment let's say they are Sunnis e.g. Hamza Yusuf is a sufi (or I think he is).  Didn't he also meet commendable and good Turkish people who are not Sufis, but practise Islam? Are they all below his expectations and only Sufis pleased him so immensely, he can't say enough (even in block letters) about them? I find this hard to believe. He is just preaching this to promote sufism, not becasue he loves only Sufis.
 He seems to like Zaha well enough. And even praised her in a similar friendly fashion.
 
I am not stating either that he said anything else bad about Sunnis, but saying that "salafist" or "wahhabi" (which is a misnomer which doesn't mean anything) are extremists is also something I take issue with, and very strongly.
 
(Please Read Part Three to Find out why... next. Yours, J D-N)

Saturday, December 7, 2013

I'm Just A Muslim

There is a common misconception today, that Muslims are not also Salafis. This labeling the majority of Sunnis as "Salafists" or "Wahhabis" is starting to border on hate speech, so I have to clear something up now. Firstly, Sunnis and Sufis all call themselves Muslims, and hardly do they get into discussions about their differences, except as an educational exercise. We are very united in our views and aspirations, but appear to be disunited; the media perpetrates the appearance of great schisms, which don't really exist (or result in disunity) among Muslims in their daily relationships with each other.


Secondly, just as people find Sufis loveable, so are the general Muslims loveable. They are not murderers, bigots, rapists, haters; they are people with religious convictions and beliefs, which reflect their upbringing and also their love of God Almighty and Muhammad, and Islam. Their goal in life isn’t to cause others pain and suffering. They are just as kind and compassionate as anybody else. I really resent these labels, which America and the media are attaching to Sunni Muslims.

All Muslims call themselves Muslims, and don’t believe they need any labels apart from that to be counted among the true believers. Some words, such as “Hanbali” or “Maaliki” denote the school of thought a person might adhere to in his daily practice and way of worship, such that his hands are placed a certain way, or he makes certain specific actions in the prayer, which other Sunnis who are not from the same school, or raised in the same country or region where he would have learned the same traditions don't all do - but which are all based on Islamic traditions found in the books, such as Sahih Bukhari or Sahih Muslim, and others. When someone has studied under a scholar he may change the way he practices in some small ways, which might reflect more closely how the Prophet did things, compared to many others who have learned Islam from their parents or an older sibling or their cousins. None of this is dangerous or removes one out of the fold of Islam. Most common people don’t know about the finer points or the discussions which are held in classrooms as intellectual exercises, or to discover which traditions match more closely with what the early Muslims did, who we call in Islamic terminology, “the salaf”. (If you understand what “the salaf” means, then you should be careful of using the term “salafi”) It is not to refer to bad or evil Muslims who you fear are the enemy, because such "salafists" don’t exist~!! There is no evil “salafi” because a “salafi” person is one who tries his best to be a Muslim in the tradition of the earliest Muslims, who are all our best examples.

Non-Muslims and especially the media want to “label” many of the Muslims as terrorists, and using the label Salafi for Muslims as though they are evil, and as though the word “Salafi” means something which it doesn’t or a bad person, or a bad “cult”(which it really doesn’t in the original usage) Salafi is just another way to say a person who follows the way of the Prophet Muhammad and the early generations of Muslims.

If someone is afraid of Muslims in general, without good reason, then he is an Islamophobe, and there is little hope he will learn the truth of Islam and what Muslims really believe. But if someone is just confused by labels, they should try to discover the truth about Islam and Muslims by reading or going to proper Islamic websites, and ask a Muslim about their concerns. I for one am willing to entertain anyone who is sincere about learning more about any issue related to Islam and Muslims. If I can give evidence or at least tell my personal beliefs, which I can say are the mainstream, then I’m happy to oblige. I don’t insist someone has to become a Muslim. I am not preaching Islam to convert people, though that would please me, but I am really more interested in explaining the true meaning of Islam and teaching others about what I really believe. Islam is not “of the devil” or a strange “cult”; it is a “religion” in the truest and best sense of the word.



Thursday, October 17, 2013

Is Yusuf Estes Muslim?

Pet Peeves

I have some things that get me peeved; it means that my day isn’t completely ruined by them, but that I get “an itch” (the same feeling as when you want to scratch an itch on your body) to do something about what peeved me. For example, I wrote about robots and androids, a long time ago, when I had a blog connected to my Windows Live TM or Windows Live R.

One of my less troublesome pet peeves is that I don’t know and can’t remember what I’m supposed to put at the end of words connected to a registered trademark or words and other things with copyright. - As in the example in the first paragraph (above). Where do I find out about this? The thing is, it isn’t even “bothersome” because I’ve never done anything about this, except attempt to hide my ignorance. I have never been motivated enough to search it on Google (the trademark owners and everyone else know who they are.)

Another of my pet peeves is that most everyone’s websites look better than mine. I am currently following a few blogs, one of them being Yvonne Ridley’s “From Soho 2 Silo” (type Soho, and surprisingly, it isn’t in the computer’s dictionary!) I guess I can live with that.

I don’t particularly like what I have done with my blog, though I think the cloud app is a nice touch, and I like my Mecca Live feed, or video stream (located on the bottom of my blog’s page).It’s not really mine, I just embedded it onto my blog from another location.

But I am going to defend my blog here, because I think at least, it is honest. (Read previous post, or post connected with this idea, about dishonesty or how some websites deliberately (try to) mislead the public or visitors to their website, or blog.

If you hate someone, just come out and say it, dammit!!… Probably the website I mention today by MWFJ is just one example of many.

Also, I don’t like when people say “I hate” this or “I hate” that, or “I hate” someone (LOL)

But seriously, there is enough pain and suffering in the world without this. Hate is a strong word. Those people would do better to think of other ways to express how they feel about something or someone, without resorting to the “H” word.

The final one I’ll mention, although this doesn’t close the book on what I get peeved about, (nor are these necessarily my most troublesome peeves) is trying to reply back to people on the internet, sometimes it is just impossible. Maybe my internet connection is too slow, sometimes the upload is slow, but the download is still moving (albeit very slowly). I’ve noticed that when the upload was zero I couldn’t comment on a video (or something else) Answering emails or replying to comments to me, isn’t being rerouted to the right place? Or there is something I’m not aware of, or a simple way to reply to others which I haven’t figured out.

If you like this blog, you might like “???” (Edit - I’ll post a link here when I find the post I want to connect to).

(Probably people might get peeved when they see that I have not edited or revised something like a direct quote in a post.)

********

I will take this opportunity to ask others to share my previous post about lying websites, e.g. the ones connected to Muslim Witnesses for Justice (MWFJ). DO NOT go to their website or download their Pdf - you are just helping spread their message if you do (Unless you agree with them, in which case I have nothing else to say to you right now.) If you like Yusuf Estes, share my blog, too.

Or better yet, share your favorite Islamic videos and websites (by him).

The “UPDATE”

Currently, it is my thinking that a lot of people don’t know anything about what said group (MWFJ) has to say, so it is counter intuitive to bring it up again, but I am doing this as a public service, so you know. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, even on my blog. I can also make mistakes and have. Sometimes on my channel or here I will tell you or correct a previous mistake. I might write a separate post clarifying something or correcting something and also do the same on my channel’s (Diamondraw4Real) discussion page, or in a video’s comments, etc. (Also) elsewhere on the net.

I’ve been wondering what to write about recently, until this morning when I read some of the feeds (on my other computer) which I haven’t looked at for the longest time, and discovered that Muslim Witnesses For Justice actually are against Yusuf Estes because of things he may or may not have said or meant in some comments, or in some videos. (I had thought they were in support of him – as you would know if you’ve read the previous post)

Whether Yusuf Estes apologized or not for anything which he might have said doesn’t concern me as much as the fact that there is a ‘witch hunt’ or an ‘inquisition’ to have him ‘blacklisted’. Some would probably like him expelled from the ummah; I think this is going to extremes, and isn’t right. There is a point when you have to live and let live, no matter what your personal beliefs.

Boot Straps

I have many ideas to work with, and notes to type out or revise – it shouldn’t be long before I am back writing and posting regularly to my blog. So, there is a lot to write about, and that’s never a problem for bloggers.

I have had a real problem with motivation, partly due to events this past summer and also because I haven’t been balancing personal and work related matters as well as I should or could. But I still want to give priority to writing blogposts so I will try harder to commit to publishing some posts on a regular basis.

Finally, I want to mention that I’ve been working on a book, which I might do as an e-book – or I might publish it as chapters on the internet. Charles Dickens book(s) was (were) published in newspapers as separate chapters (e.g. Tale of Two Cities or Hard Times) before it (they) was (were) published as a complete work(s). Of course, I won’t publish all of it, but only excerpts, to find out what readers think. This is a big “might”. Just thinking about it makes me stress. I know any time now I will see an ad about how to publish my work as an e-book. That’s how cookies work, and it is both helpful and intrusive at the same time.





Thursday, June 21, 2012

My tough love

Respect is more important than love; you could call tolerance a part of respect.
I can tolerate almost anyone, but to love someone is not a small deal. We love our families. Love is nothing to take lightly. While love is important, and people can't live without it, respect must also be nurtured. Respect for others, whether similar or different (to oneself) is more important than love. Societies cannot function without 'respect'; families members also must show respect; love binds people closer together, but with loss of respect relationships will fall apart; no matter how much love might be there. This is why Muslims must not make jokes about their friends, or call them names they don't like. Insincerity will undermine the relationship between 'lovers' (or friends).
The 'sufis' speak about love as though it has no boundaries; like ‘free love’, it seems to permeate their lives, but runs ‘hither and thither’ out of control. They also have no sense of who the Muslim is really supposed to be; "serious about religion" is not an area of importance to them, anyone with a drum, dancing to his own rhythm can join, and is ‘Muslim’.
Sufism was a lot about ‘worship’, worshiping through body movements and dancing, or chanting repeatedly. Everyone has seen the whirling of the dervishes. For the ‘religious’ among them, their rituals begin at dawn, or prior to the dawn. (I wonder if they go to ‘salaat’ in congregation at all?). The media portrays them as obsessed with 'dancing' and 'worship', but doesn't speak about their daily life, at all. This image is something which also feeds the wrong portrayal of Muslims in general.
Islam has obligations which have to be met, such as the five times daily prayers; and for men that means in congregation in the ‘masjid’. But work, societal and family demands must also be met and often take precedence.
(If you are Muslim, please pray on time and in congregation (for the men). If you are sincere, Allah will make it easy for you. If you love Allah, you will pray on time and with submission).
Many people do not pray the prayers correctly, or regularly; the prayer is something which can draw you nearer to Allah, but it is also compulsory; if you don’t pray Allah can punish you. Moreover, your life will feel empty without Allah.
Islam is a 'way of life'

But Islam is not only about ‘worship’; the acts of worship; there is more to Islam than prayers and rituals. Islam is a complete way of life, not a mere religion like Christianity is in the typical Western mind.
While many Westerners are now attracted to the rituals in Buddhism, or even the martial arts, which is a form of body worship, Islam compels the non-Muslim to seek out the infinite wisdom and beauty of this greatest of all religions with its “beautiful preaching”. Islam, to them, seems harsh, medieval and barbaric, misogynistic and incomprehensible; that is the fault of the person, who reasons about Islam, not with truth and sincerity, but with incorrect assumptions and wrong beliefs about Islam which have been internalized over a lifetime, in many cases.

Some sufis believe that to love everyone is the way to go; this is similar to what Christian preachers claim, that they love everybody; or that's what they say. But to preach 'love' and not preach Islam, is not sincerity. One could preach tolerance more than love; tolerance is a cornerstone not only of "freedom", but of "respect". Even "love" requires some level of tolerance. but it seems that Christian preachers do not have both in their repertoire when dealing with Muslims. One feels that they can barely stand to look at some of their Muslim fellows (who preach Islam). They often seem agitated, and angry. Body language will often give a person's real thoughts and feelings away.
On facebook, a couple of years ago, I was unfriended by an American Muslim who was very vocal about her feelings against her government; she was what some call a 911truther, among other things. She was very visible, with many friends, and yes, she was even a "Sufi". When I commented that "Tolerance does not imply love", at the end of a conversation with two Christians in my friend's group, well, that was all she (or someone else) needed. I was not a friend; I was not loveable. I had not said anything in bad taste, in fact I had defended the Christian fundamentalist's right to her opinion! Yet, there was someone in that space who found offence with my speech. It was too bad, I thought, and I was disappointed. I picked myself up and dusted myself off, as the expression goes.
The truth about tolerance, is that most people don't know what it means; and they don't know what it is. They don't practice real tolerance. "Tolerance does not imply love".
Muslims are very tolerant, and usually they can show patience in the face of adversity.
For someone sincere to learn the Truth, Allah will guide him to the straight path which is Islam.
DD

Wednesday, June 20, 2012

Religion With Culture

 

Religion with culture



                   Religion with culture



In Islam, religion and culture are  not  always  divisible; we don’t  look at  culture as independent of religion ; there  is no "one Islamic culture" per se. What  is religious and what  is culture are not always black and white; for example, what is called Arab culture, or Pakistani or Indian culture can be just as Islamic as religious worship; the purpose of “hiijab” is to cover, it doesn’t matter if it’s white or black, or blue as long as it meets the requirements for women’s dress (i.e. loose, not transparent, doesn’t have pictures of animates, is not attractive so as to cause distraction) It is necessary to dress “Islamically” (Islamically correct) to meet the requirements for prayer and modesty. There is a dress code for men, as well. Men’s clothing should not be transparent, should be loose, and should cover the private parts (the navel to the knees). One should be able to perform his/her duties and function with the clothing and accessories one wears. It is preferable for men to cover their shoulders (i.e. wear a shirt, or if one doesn’t have a shirt, a cloth, or sheet) while performing prayers. It is also preferable for men to wear perfume to the masjid/prayers, and to use a toothbrush in preparations for going out, whether to prayers or other, or after eating.



Some styles in clothing, and accessories, such as high heels, or additional hair (which would in any case be covered) are haram (forbidden). Hair extensions and beautification such as plucking of eyebrows are unIslamic, and were forbidden by the Prophet as unnatural, and things which cause the curse of Allah. There are many other things described in the traditions as being unnatural, deviations, or practices of non-Muslims. Muslim women should keep clean, but should not wear strong perfume in public places.



These are just some of the things which Muslims should know. We only convey these things to the non-Muslims to give them some understanding of Islam, and why Islamic culture takes precedence over unIslamic practices, or things foreign to Islam. They do not have to accept, but it is the duty of Muslims to remind and tell the truth about Islam. We don’t want to allow misconceptions in the media or internet without speaking out and clarifying the issues.




Jane Dughatir: Governments against Islam