Showing posts with label American Muslims. Show all posts
Showing posts with label American Muslims. Show all posts

Thursday, February 23, 2017

What is Jihad, Seriously, Again??

"Please point me in the direction of a copy of quran and sharia that you believe is right. And I will see if it differs from those I have allready. No compulsion in religion Holy war is the duty of all moslems."

Someone wrote, the above and wants to know, What is Jihad?

The reply I wrote, follows below. If anyone has a better definition or explanation, please feel free to send me
an email or comment below, thankx. The comments are 'screened', like Muslims at an international airport, before posting, so it may take a while before you see your comment.

Reply:
No, there is no "Holy War". That's a Christian evangelical idea. Their words. Jihad simply means striving in the path of God. If someone builds schools, mosques, roads, wells, that's all charity that earns rewards for the person who donates to such projects. It is the best kind of charity, something that benefits for a long time.There are types of jihad, too. Fighting one's own desires, is also jihad. When many people talk about Islam or jihad, all they talk about is "unjust war". War in Islam is for defense.
The Battle of Badr and Battle of Uhud, the two most remembered battles didn't have many deaths or casualties compared to many other wars. The pagans or the Muslims had to go. God favored the Muslims in the end, and Medina was established as a Muslim capital. It took Muhammad, over twenty years of preaching but most of the Arab pagans converted after that. Mekkah was a bloodless victory, in that everyone surrendered, and only the criminals were not released (there was actually one man who went into the Kaabah to escape and he was killed).
The head leader, Abu Jahal had died, and some of the others had already converted before the Fateh al Mekkah, that day, so the rest of their tribe soon followed, like Khalid Ibn Walid, who later converted, but Abu Sufyan another famous person had converted before that, and his wife was HInd, a woman who had hired an assassin to kill the Prophet's uncle Hamza. Despite this, they converted of their own free will when God willed. And became good Muslims.
Another case in point is the Jews and hypocrites in Medina who sided with them, after declaring their Islam, which people always bring up. Why were Jews killed in Medina or evicted? Because they were traitors. Do you want traitors who attack you to be given a free pass?? Do you only HATE Muslims but LOVE traitors?? No. War is just at certain times. Americans will "never forget" 911 but they forgot Iraq's innocent children very quickly. (SOMETIMES SOME) Americans and (SOMETIMES SOME)Christians are some of the worst hypocrites alive today. Muslims don't say that war isn't justified, but they believe that killing innocents is forbidden.
If some Muslims do that, they are the worst criminals. STOP saying (not you personally) that Muslims never say anything when terrorist attacks occur. We are against terrorism and killing of innocents, but when we say that, who is listening?? Oh. No one.. Obviously you still believe the lies about Islam or you wouldn't be asking about "No compulsion in religion". Don't be lazy and do some of your own reading. One book which is pretty good is "The Sealed Nectar". It won't cost you an arm and a leg. It is a biography of the Prophet Muhammad, and tells a lot about the battles, including Badr and Uhud, and why the Jews (traitors) were killed. It won a prize for the best biography in a contest, and was written by an Indian Muslim scholar and translated into English. There are many hadiths showing how kind and generous the Prophet Muhammad was. His character is pure and good, but non-Muslims want to make his character vile and evil. God forbid we should not defend him.
There is no translation that will do justice to the Quran, not just because it's Arabic, but because translators are human beings, and other languages also aren't as great as the Quranic Arabic. English, especially, is a young language, and you can see how it is being destroyed today. But there are some translations that are better than others. The Yusuf Ali one was edited because it had bigger problems than some others.
The Bible has many verses that must be embarrassing for Christians, some people say the same thing about Hadiths. Well, the hadiths aren't the word of God. (There are Hadiths Qudsi, which are God's words revealed to Muhammad, but not part of the Quran). But the majority of hadiths/sayings or traditions are not God's words, and also they were written and compiled after a long time. So they are more like what the Bible is in terms of how long after the events they were collected into books. The bible is also not God's word, so that explains why there are a lot of wrong things in it. No offence to people who read it to study it and get some good out of it. Cherry picking verses is the past-time of the non-Muslims. They do it with their own book and with the Quran (translation of the meaning of the Quran). But many people still say it is one of the best today (if you get the edited version). Learning Arabic is impossible for most people. But it is different when you know some Arabic and can read the original. That being said, the problem isn't even which translation but that people read with a closed mind, and there's no 'medicine' for that, except to ask God to open your heart and mind. Shariah is Islamic law, there is only one "islamic law". There are colleges that teach Usul Fiqh, jurisprudence. They will teach about the way to understand and apply laws. You know, stuff I haven't studied indepth.
There are many non-Muslims in Muslim majority states and they are not all fighting each other. Muslims work with non-Muslims here. We have a fairly peaceful country. The government is fair, and people are free to live and work. There is also one of the oldest Catholic Churches in the ME in our country (I am a citizen now too, as are many people who got their citizenship in the past couple of decades).
Just like any other person studies law, it is studied in Muslim countries, and also some other countries today. There is ijtihad, which is consensus of opinion, where a question is something the scholars today may not know about, such as things that never happened in the past, or for which there is no ruling. In law this is like looking for precedents, and if there aren't any then you derive an opinion from looking at the whole body of works on that subject and using their brains. Judges can be wrong, also when making judgments, and this is not denied. But Islamic law lays a lot of emphasis on proofs, and circumstantial evidence isn't emphasized. Even if a man is found with a knife in his hand at the scene of a stabbing death, doesn't prove his guilt, for example. There was such a case and the judge makes sure that he gets to the truth, if possible, or else the person can't be convicted of murder. In a very old case which happened, a man was actually found not guilty, because it turned out he confessed because he thought none would believe him anyway if he told the truth. He had come upon a murder scene, grabbed the weapon and then been found by people. Later, a man actually confessed, because he was afraid that he would be responsible for the murder of the victim plus the unjust killing of the person who confessed to the killing. I guess stranger things have happened. There *is* no compulsion in religion, so just go about your life like you always have if you have no interest in learning about Islam. Men are responsible for the expenses even when women work. That doesn't mean women marry men for their money, like many people say. Many non-Muslim women also are converting to Islam here, and also men are converting to Islam. There is no forced conversion. People are free to live and work, and they are free to worship wherever they are able to do that. In Canada, Muslims often pray at work, on their break, and it's not against the law. Why do people think freedom of religion is such a difficult concept??
Good day.

I THINK THIS IS ADDED LATER? :

I live in Bahrain, and it's fine, people have recreation and all the many things that they have back home, even many of the same foods, restaurants and fast food places, they may have a church (it varies in the ME from country to country). Not every Christian denomination has a church obviously. But it isn't the responsibility of a government to give land away for every church that some people want. I think the same goes of the masjids (mosques) in non-Muslim countries.I don't object to laws that are meant to protect people, and countries have a right to make such laws. But there are also laws against wrongful oppression of immigrants, etc. It is not only fair, but required that governments treat all their citizens equally and punish the wrongdoers, but not wrongfully convict innocent people or treat people who are not criminals like criminals. All governments, if they abide by the humanitarian laws, will treat citizens and also immigrants, or visa workers with kindness, justice and secure their peaceful existence and human dignity. Unfortunately,that's not always the case, is it? Islam has human rights, and even animal rights. These are binding in the Islamic texts, and are obvious.



[Jane Dughatir] Thanks for reading! Have a nice day/evening :)

(EDITS are in round brackets: when I probably insulted many ppl already I was informed by a friend about the error/mistake and corrected my wrong sentence. I have already apologized on social media. #clickbait #racism)

Thursday, January 23, 2014

What it means to have a festival

I'll be sharing more older posts for the rest of January, sharing more comments from Google+ and tying into Islamic subjects that are of interest to the wider public.
Can't think of much off the top of my head, except the writing I've saved onto the home PC, for the moment, but I'm sure I can come up with other interesting original things to say soon. Insha Allah.

Today, "What It Means To Have A Festival" about the problems at a cultural event held in the US, which had (I'm guessing, educatedly) both Arab Christians and Arab Muslims, and many non Arab Americans.
Probably some bigotry or hate on both sides who were involved.

More bitmaps for readers, about the blog, comments and stats. Also bitmaps from Twitter, which are a new thing on the blog I'm introducing and will try to do more of in the future as well.

Since I can't comment on google+ these days, I have other ways to get around that by sharing on the blog, but probably there is a solution to that; also, readers comments welcome on the blog. I have commented myself here, so don't see why others can't or are unable. Maybe that's not so?


Also, photos and video this week.



Comments on blogger


Sunday, December 8, 2013

Little Red & Peace & Love - Part 3

Zaha S Asks:

Yesterday 12:15 AM
What exactly am I being ignorant about?


tvee, wrote 

Yesterday 10:15 PM

"+Jane Dughatir I'll be the first to tell you I don't have an in-depth understanding of Islam, let alone the basics. From reading your comments here, I would rather learn about Islam and appreciate it from Zaha S rather than you. At least I'll certainly be guaranteed of a rational, objective and intelligent discussion on Islamic teachings and issues faced by Muslims. I doubt that's probable with you! Are you truly knowledgeable about Islamic teachings? Perhaps. Are you an arrogant person? Yes. Are you objective and possess some intelligence? Absolutely….. NOT! That's just my opinion. U are so stupid, you can't even process the meaning of words in your hollow head. Where in my comment did I say sufis are 'kind'? I mentioned the words 'gentle', 'compassionate', 'love, 'peace' 'tolerance' and 'universal brotherhood'. I'm not a genius but please only reply back to me if you have an IQ equal to or higher than my 128. It's utterly frustrating trying to communicate with stupid AND arrogant people!"

Besides the redundancy, it is a load of b.s . Is he serious?? Oh I believe him, I just think it is full of “righteous indignation” at being “insulted” (my words: righteous indignation is the belief that you have the right to be angry [or indignant] even though others don’t agree.). In this case, I don’t agree that he has a right to be indignant, angry or sad; he should be embarrassed for behaving childishly - however, if he is sad that he doesn’t understand Islam properly, then good.

“I’ll be the first to tell you I don’t have an in-depth understanding of Islam, let alone the basics.” …etc…

He admits ignorance, totally…BUT…

[And] “Perhaps. Are you an arrogant person? Yes. Are you objective and possess some intelligence? Absolutely….. NOT! That's just my opinion. U are so stupid, you can't even process the meaning of words in your hollow head. Where in my comment did I say sufis are 'kind'? I mentioned the words 'gentle', 'compassionate', 'love, 'peace' 'tolerance'”

Ha-ha. It is so sad, it is tragically funny. I really wish he has a chance to reflect after cooling down. BUT, the ball is in his court, he can do that or not.

I have one line of questioning:

If he admires the sufis so much, he should really try much harder to become like them. I don’t think a Sufi would take someone to task just for saying someone different than them said another person is “nice” and misquoted him when he really said “gentle, compassionate, love peace tolerance,”!!

Then he expects me to believe he is a good person and I am mistreating him and have been arrogant?? Yes, I am telling you what Islam really is, according to what I believe and have studied for years, both on my own and in a real classroom in a University setting. Don’t insult MY intelligence. I’m glad I never claimed to have the IQ of a genius just to “score points”. I don’t have to do something that childish and innane, which is also impossible to prove, so totally pointless.



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:05 PM

Since name calling is permissible I did some of my own as that is what he did first (“He did it first” - this is turning into a useless exercise., which is why I ALWAYS say, “Debates are counterproductive to Understanding Islam” unless you really pay attention)

ur the idiot, obviously. So in your dictionary kind and compassionate isn't any thing close to what you described about the sufi person you met?? Are you serious or just being a troll? I wasn't quoting you, should be obvious, I was describing how you explained that you met the nice sufi guy and that it seems you believe all Musilms in your eyes are not equal to the task, of being kind or good people except a sufi or someone like Zaha, who can't defend her own religion's teachings, if she is indeed a Muslims (sic), which I'm not certain of either. Anyone who reads this will consider you an absolute moron. Excuse me if you didn't say kind, lol. You are more arrogant if you think ur ranting is going to fool anybody. I don't care if you believe I'm foolish or arrogant because obviously you have no sense at all!! good day. Unlike you, I do have a basic understanding of Islam at the very least, and unlike you, I don't fall for ignorant ppl's claims e.g. what zaha had said, because she wants to be a weak person who kisses ass of Islamophobes or her non-Muslim friends or family or maybe she is also not even Muslim, I don't know if she is or not. Considering her level of ignorance, I wouldn't be surprised if she doesn't even pray, even if she is Muslim. Or know how to pray. I don't care to have any more dialogue with you. so plz don't send another reply defending your position.+tvee with the high IQ which is totally not true, or youre a monkey's uncle.



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:12 PM

where is Zaha? she can't say anything more to defend herself and needs you,

Mr. T?? +tvee



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:29 PM

Just to quote some of what little Zaha S had said previously, "Its apart of a terrible cultural practice in the Middle East I thought that was already established. Yes it is something good because it is my way of life and I see it as beautiful and peaceful and if more people embrace that lifestyle then that makes me happy. What propaganda? I'm still itching my head at your ignorance, I don't think you're an idiot though, just misinformed. There is no such thing as forced Islam and most reverts find Islam on their own. Ask me anything, what did I ignore? I apologize if I ignored anything."

She is scratching her head, after lying about Islam, which the non-Muslim terente P is more knowledgeable about then herself!! Yes, there are beheadings in Saudi Arabia, as a punishment, which still occur now. And in Iran, ppl also are killed; It is strange however, that many women, not as many men, it seems, are killed for sexual crimes there, but how can this be Islamic? There seems to be something else at work besides women being promiscuous, and I wonder what their "crime" really is?? (Slight revision - about Iran - just to make clear that I don’t approve of what happens in Iran, though Iran claims to practice sharia as well. They have a different understanding of Islam than Sunnis, however. I dare say very different in many aspects. I say I don’t approve, but I don’t say I would impose my will on them, and that goes for the sufis and all other groups or branches of Islam or sects. As long as they don’t claim to have rights over me, I don’t have a dispute with them. But if they are hurting their citizens and are extremely unjust, maybe I will comment, and that’s my right, too. December, 8th)

But Zaha (and others) don't deny things that are even written in the papers or seen in public squares in Saudi or Iran. Yes, sharia calls for some criminals to be beheaded or sexual crimes like adultery to be punished with stoning. Anyone who knows anything about Islam knows this. It is a weak Muslim who denies this.
Do Muslims want to kill all non-Muslims, NO. Do Muslims want to hang non-Muslims for having boyfriends and girlfriends in their own country? NO. Do we want to have people in non-Muslim countries who steal punished with the Islamic punishment if they have stolen something equal to twenty bucks, say? NO.

State the real position on Islamic topics, don't make up your own ideas or an entirely different religous point of view (that's not permitted in Islam, ask any educated Muslim). It is wrong to lie about the religion, period. I don't care if you are nice and want friends all over the internet and want non-Muslims to love you, it is non (sic) sanctioned by the religion, to lie about your religion. If you are that ignorant, be quiet, for your own sake!!

Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:56 PM

Islam is only right for those willing to accept it, says Zaha S, lol. So its only right for Musilms (sic). We actually believe it is right for everybody, but that doesn't mean other ppl will become Muslim. And that is their own business. But don't say such things, I am afraid your English needs refreshing. I don't blame otherrs (sp)for their poor English but if your English isn't up to par or isn't at a certain level of proficiency, you should watch how you say things and what you say in general, so you are not taken to task for unintended meanings or blatantly wrong ideas.


Zaha S

1:02 AM

I don't think you understood what I was saying. Of course Islam is for everyone, as everyone is born a Muslim. But what I meant is that it should not be forced on anyone. Please refrain from insulting me, I hope you meant well. M3asalama.


Advice for Zaha,

I know what you meant, but you didn’t say that; that’s my point; be careful and revise your mistakes. ["Of course Islam is for everyone, ....", she wrote the next time, which is what she "wanted" to say, but 'somehow' turned it 180 degrees, into an opposite idea !! ] If you make blatant mistakes, such that you apologize for everybody, you are telling them you think it is okay to be whatever they want (according to most, it is okay). It is even their legal right to do and believe what they wish, but it isn’t going to help them in their search for "enlightenment" if You LIE.. Don’t say, Islam isn’t for everybody, it is, so why did you say that in the first place?? Say what you mean… and apologize if you said something incorrect.

********
The bigger problem is her lying about Islam. And I have already gone over all that. If you care about ppl then you want to tell them what Islam really teaches, not make up stuff, or pretend you know what you don’t know. People love to get along and not to rock the boat, but that means they also lie about their beliefs just to please others; which is what you seem to be doing. Or you are preaching about Islam without correct knowledge.


Zaha S

1:14 AM

+Jane Dughatir I don't really understand what I'm denying either? It is true what you said about Saudia and Iran I never denied that, what I'm saying is their governments are not Islamic! No country in the world practices Sharia law perfectly. I also mentioned that crimes like those are punishable but not all by death, because at the end of the day you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives (of course some things like rape and murder are another story). Thank you for calling someone you don't know a weak Muslim and "little" I really appreciate that. I'm not going to spend my time responding to someone who insults me, especially a fellow Muslim. If you are Muslim yourself you would know that Islam preaches kindness. Once again M3asalama.


J D-N 

2:21 AM

salaam, dear. No, you said the specific crimes that were discussed such as sexual crimes are not punishable and they are. So is stealing. That's in Islam when a country properly practices sharia, which is why even though Saudi and Iran are not perfect models of Islam, they do have such punishments which have always been done in Saudi, following the way of the early Muslims. People read about Islam and books are easy to find, as well as some proper sites on internet. ..."You can't fool everybody all of the time." And you can't fool me. Yes, ma'a salaam. Islam also preaches knowledge of your religion. Even many non-Muslims know Islam better and defend it better than you do.


J D-N

2:47 AM

Well, being that Zaha is a Libyan and American answers a lot, lol. I know many, many Libyans who were ignorant of their religion so much that they would defend the non-Muslim's calendar saying it is better than the very accurate Islamic Hijri calendar, which is based on the phases of the moon. Anything Islamic, they would run away from. So, yes, I get that Zaha, is somewhat afraid of Islam, and doesn't appreciate the need for sharia.

If you prayed in Libya in the mosque regularly you ended up in prison. Yet Ghaddafi claimed he was a defender of Muslim rights, or that's what the west told everyone. So, little Zaha's family moved to the west and raised her as a non hiijab wearing ignorant Muslim, who doesn't have a proper Islamic grounding..and is afraid of Islam's reality, much like non-believers she tries to convince that Islam is not what they read in the hadiths books. But for the most part, it really is. I am not talking about misinterpreted texts, but true Islam as taught in Islamic colleges in the gulf states. These are colleges which accept people who have at minimum a highschool GPA of 70% or higher, and who can learn or read Arabic, who can memorize Quran. Such people who can devote themselves to studying at University level, and who are serious about learning. I'm not speaking of children's Islamic study halls, or musallas. As for those who are "weak" and "afraid" you should Stop! making up lies to defend your religion! Islam doesn't need you to lie for Islam. Islam is good and it is the Truth. #Quran #islam #Muhammad

Why do I say Zaha is “little” , or “weak and afraid” ,because she behaves like a child. She is “weak” in her Islamic knowledge or her practice. Does she wear a hijab? Not in her photo. Should she? Should she post photos of herself (according to the sharia) or should she cover her hair at least?

She isn’t practicing as much as many other Muslim girls or women do. Many also are like her, I know that. It is her responsibility if she knows Islam, to practice it properly. I am not going to judge her here or anytime, but God will. As a Muslim I hope she considers that.

[I wonder if tvee is her brother. He seems to defend her a lot, but he says he is an atheist.
There are many Libyans who were communists, so atheism isn’t a far stretch for them. But that’s enough about that.]



Little Red & Islam Means "Love" - Part 2

(Zaha S, says)

Ummm first and foremost Allah is Arabic for God and lol I don't think you fully understand the meaning of "Islamophobe". I don't agree with these terrorist groups and most good pious Muslims don't either but they have power, money, and believe it or not the Western governments backing them up so there is not much we can do except use our voices. The only spread of Islam you're talking about is peaceful just like Mormons or Jehovah's witness' at your door on a Sunday morning except even less. Honestly the only thing I'm really concerned about is people looking at weird groups or countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia as models of Islam and thats the opposite no country on earth is representing Islam correctly unfortunately. So please please please as a fellow human being talk to a Muslim about our way of life, don't gather info from Islamophobe sites or people. Happy Turkey Day :)

terente P , says:

+Zaha S

no matter what allah in arabic means! its about what are the properties of that allah and they indicate satan, not god. if that what arabs understand as god its actually satan, then is satan their god! worshipers of satan = muslims

you take the arabic meaning of god but tell further down saudi arabia is a weird country :))

you claim there are only some bad examples, but you cant mention a single islamic country where islam isnt bullshit - islam isnt peaceful, no matter which country we take as example

-honour killings

-minor marriages

-death penalties for homosexuality, sex outside marriage, apostates

-slavery

-oppression of women generally

....

we dont need spreading of islam!


Zaha S

Nov 29, 2013  
"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God). Yeah exactly there are no countries where Islamic law is practiced correctly. And it really does make me mad because there are extremist groups who are absolutely horrid, very UnIslamic, and they oppress all those around them and people who aren't Muslim get the wrong idea. All those supposed "properties" of Islam you mentioned are not Islamic at all they are cultural. I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God) because Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land and inherit WAAY before the West did. Like I said a lot of what you said is cultural like honor killings, minor marriages, it is true that homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death . Slavery is also forbidden in Islam. I could go on this makes me so sad that you're so misinformed. If you don't like peace then so be it but please refrain from criticizing my way of life. I love all of God's creation and so I do care that you understand Islam correctly."



terente P

Nov 30, 2013  

you are the one who is totaly misinformed about islam if you claim that would be cultural and not islamic!

"homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death"

I can show you fatwas which tell that homosexuality and apostasy must be punished by death. and even if it would be only forbiden, why should it be forbiden? that reveals the intolerant and totalitary character of islam!

"Slavery is also forbidden in Islam."

Qatar is treating their guest workers like slaves and also in every islamic country there is slavery. all that is according to sharia, the jurisdiction in islam (from allah)

and what kind of filthy culture is that, which includes all that atrocities? thats no culture! its coming from that filthy book, quran

"Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land"

dont tell bullshit! women arent allowed to vote in islamic countries, nor to divorce. all that rights are given to you by our democracy, our human rights in the west! you have nothing like that in islam! where did you get all that rights in islam if you already claimed that no islamic country practice it correctly? YOU LIE, LIKE EVERY MUSLIM BEING GAME OVER! :))

and how is looking that correct islam, if it isnt practiced anyplace?

"refrain from criticizing my way of life"

so far your way of life interfere mine, not only that i will criticize,but I also fight it!

"I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God)"

why thank god? that means you see yourself as something better than those who arent mulsims. that is muslim infatuation!

"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God)"

no, it isnt, because the quran's god is satan
you worship satan when you pray every day

"If you don't like peace..."

islam doesnt know peace! islam is obediance, oppression, violence, hate, submission, conquest, ....

stop spreading that filthy cult around the world! nobody like muslims, there are everywhere problems with them. if you dont put and end peacefully to that insanity of an illiterate pedophile sik man from 1440yrs ago, we will have to put an end, no matter what we have to do for that. we have to protect our cultures and our future from that threat called islam!



tvee

Nov 30, 2013

+Zaha S You are absolutely right! Your comments are refreshing and enlightening. You are obviously a person who values PEACE and LOVE amongst ALL people. I'd like to know your opinion about 2 question I have - Wasn't Islam as practiced during the early years of the Prophet Mohammed influenced by the Arabian tribal and cultural traditions and values of the people at that time? Beheadings for some crimes? Honor punishments? chopping of limbs? Are beheadings and cutting of limbs for punishment mentioned in the Quran? 2nd question - in your opinion, which Islamic country today comes CLOSEST to being truly Islamic? I know you said there are none, but the closest (even if it is a far shot)?



Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

+tvee Hey thanks, and its nice to meet someone with the same values regardless of their background and who they are! During the early years of Islam Prophet Muhammed and his few but growing followers were looked down upon, beaten, tortured, for their differing views which were going against what you're talking about plus to give charity to the needy, stop worshipping idols, abolish slavery etcc. Killing is not mentioned in the Quran unless it is in self defense, in time of war, or if someone has committed murder and proven guilty. The punishments mentioned for doing something forbidden can differ from lashings to prison time depending and then they are forgiven just as God is all forgiving. These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices. Personally I'm a Libyan-American and I haven't seen any good Islamic countries and the biggest reason is culture. I know this because I've met the best practicing Muslims here in the states, and its because they don't have that culture to influence them. Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West and 3/4 of those reverting are women. Nice talking, as long as you don't insult what I believe in then I respect you and your views :)



I have to stop here, and note some important details in point form, because there are so many!!

Zaha uses modern colloquialisms, often punishments are “horrid”; “random fact”, Etc. So I know for a fact she is a “girl”. I called her a “little girl” which she took offence at, but at least she didn’t get called worse names. So I’m not a nice person, sue me!! But the point being, I believe she is a “little girl”. It isn’t a crime to make a character judgment on the internet, even she should know that internet is impersonal and therefore, I can make judgments as I see fit. I didn't say it just to get a rise out of her, that would have been trolling. I don't do much of that.

Did I ever claim to be a nice person, or very nice? Does that matter in a debate which only requires facts? FACTS are what COUNT> being nice doesn’t mean a thing. Obviously, Terente P doesn’t care that Zaha wants “to be his friend”, and “cares about him” (my words).

The two people who do care about being friends are Zaha and Mr. T (tvee) because they have found allies in their fight for “peace”. Their peace initiative is however built on sand and not a rock, and in the real world, would fall, because you can’t have lasting peace or love built on lies.

Zaha mentions, punishments from lashings to prison time, “depending”. She is talking about serious punishments for serious crimes. But there is lashing for “fornication” and lashing for “slandering people” but if the slander amounts to accusing someone of adultery, the punishment will be flogging and the person's total humiliation - their word would never be any good, and that is something very dishonorable in Islam! Islam doesn’t permit slandering “good or chaste women” it says in the Quran. The Quran specifically mentions this sin, and especially about women, though it is the same whether a man or woman is wrongly accused.

Zaha doesn’t give specifics, okay fine. But she does then say, that “lashings and prison time” are the punishments, and that there aren’t “beheadings” or “killing” except for (we are talking about punishments not war, here) “MURDER” only. She doesn’t know or doesn’t agree that Islam punishes homosexuality (or there are examples of this in the hadiths) and adultery (the married person committing fornication, not a single person - even if he or she has sex with a married person)

I’m not going to discuss sharia more than this, just to be clear. But it is true there are examples in the traditions or hadiths/sayings, that homosexuals should be thrown off a cliff or killed e.g. stoned, I imagine. I would have to review that. (Since stoning is the lot of an adulterer I imagine it is one way to punish homosexuality which is just a different kind of “illegal sex which is forbidden” But the reason homosexuality deserves death is because “if adultery is forbidden, so is homosexuality forbidden forever” (my own words). There is no marriage in Islam between gays or lesbians, so the marriage amounts to fornication, if the ppl are unmarried or adultery if a married man or woman is having a sexual relation with another person , even if they are divorced, and not married anymore) Anyway, facts are facts. This doesn’t mean there is a lot of killing of homosexuals today however, because there are not so many ppl in Saudi or Iran “coming out” or practicing a homosexual lifestyle in plain view of the government. (That would be suicide, which is also forbidden, lol. Sorry for the moment of brevity about an important topic, FOS) Homosexuality is a worse crime than mere fornication, so that is again why it is punishable by death. Fornication between single men and women isn’t punishable by death.

Here I will just add also that I don’t believe there are very many homosexuals in the Gulf States, but for sure not many in Saudi Arabia and certainly they don’t practice openly. (In Mecca there are not homosexuals practicing openly, that is really unimaginable to me. So I say it’s impossible) However, there are openly gay or transvestites, at least, in Bahrain. Bahrain is a small island country with a monarch, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifah. It has a border crossing (a bridge) with Saudi Arabia, and many Saudis also arrive in the Kingdom every week for visits or shopping, etc.

If someone is homosexual I don’t think they would dare practice their lifestyle in public in Saudi, they are gay not stupid. Also, if they come to Saudi for work or are in the armed forces or navy and visit the city of Riyadh, or other places, they probably should keep a low profile. That’s my advice, but I’m sure these men and women know that. They receive all kinds of cultural training, so much so that Western or European women even often wear a veil or some completely cover, as you can see one elderly woman on YouTube™ do.

Also, whether one is gay or straight, they should follow the law, or they risk punishment, which in case of drug offences, drinking in public, or other, are strictly illegal and could mean jail time, deportation, or maybe even worse. The government does often forgive criminals or release them to go home after they have served some of their sentence or paid fines. If not, then after they have served a full sentence. There might also be capital punishment for some foreigners, but I don’t recall specific cases. It is something I could research; I saw one documentary about a murderer, who was serving jail time, of twenty five years maybe, for murdering his Saudi sponsor. He says he accepted Islam in prison, so maybe he did that sincerely, and isn’t being killed, or he did it to avoid a more severe punishment and is not really Muslim, but I shouldn’t speculate on that.

She also talks about sitting in the back seat instead of in the front with the man who is driving her, because she isn’t permitted to drive. And she knows that his wife would not like also if he had a woman sitting in the front with him. She doesn’t say that it makes her feel second class however, that’s just how it is there. And as a “guest” of the Kingdom, she respects the culture enough to follow the social norms and also the law of the country.



terente P

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S "These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices."

you still aren’t able to answer what kind of culture is that!? i never heard that beheadings and killings can be seen as culture...

"Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesn’t mean its autmaticaly good

and that’s only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldn’t be like that, there wouldn’t be convertions!

and why should be forced islam to grow like that? don’t you have repect for other religion?
there are a lot of questions you have no answer and put your islam in bad view. but you ignore it, like every shameless muslim i have met until now...


What I think:

I have to differ with terente P as well on some points:

Islam isn’t a culture without a religion and religion takes precedence, even though cultural differences aren’t all discouraged. So yes, the punishments are dictated by the religion when we are speaking about sharia. But there are cultural “beheadings and honor killings” which we hear about sometimes on the news, as well. IN fact, “honor killings” are purely a cultural practice and have no sanction in Islamic law, because “honor killings” are always done by the family and usually punish women or girls who might be falsely accused, or a young unmarried couple in love, who also do not deserve death or “honor killing” by stoning or any other way. Previously unmarried men and women or youth are not ever killed in Islam. So, it is being done in Muslim majority countries but is even forbidden by Islam. No one is to be killed except in four cases e.g. adultery, intentional murder (or a planned murder), homosexuality and apostasy, and Allah knows best. These are the four mentioned in the Quran specifically. That doesn’t mean that drug dealers for example, are also not likely to be beheaded or executed, because they also are “killing people” by selling and spreading narcotics. Rape is also a capital crime, and the criminal is punished, not the victim.

The fact that someone argues against culture just because it is different is not okay, in my opinion. There are many diverse cultures around the world, and this is a beautiful thing. Therefore, the evil practices are the problem. But some cultural norms appear good in one culture and would appear the opposite in another culture. So, it isn’t always easy to tell, what is good and what is evil, is it? Isn’t it sometimes the opinion of a person and not really the majority opinion? For one, the reason that referendums are held is to determine what the public wants. Sometimes, cessation looks fine to many residents, but overall, the vote is in favor of not ceseding, as happened in Quebec , and also countries in the EU have had similar type referendums about joining the European Union, or about adopting one currency, the Euro. And so on. " Sometimes, the government or senate decides what is good. These are made using their onw judgement and by majority rule, but doesn’t mean they are right. Or right for everybody just because you think they are good. Maybe they are the worst thing. Interest isn’t permitted in Islam but the non-Muslim nations think interest is a good way to make money without having to work for it, because that’s what interest amounts to, money which you get on top of your capital (which you did work for). In Islam, interest is compared to incest with one’s mother. It is considered one of the worst things around because it doesn’t create wealth or bring blessings but destroys wealth and economies.

To quote Terente again,

‘“Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesnt mean its autmaticaly good

and thats only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldnt be like that, there wouldnt be convertions!’

He believes propagating one’s religion is evil, but we are not talking about forced conversions. His opinion is that it is not good and he equates freedom of religion and free speech practiced by Muslims (when they preach openly in public) as a kind of hate crime, but many people would defend the idea that speaking about one’s religion, as happens in London a lot, in the street Dawa, or he mentions CAIR defending Islam, is free speech, and should be permitted. These are opinions, but there is also the matter of the law, which may permit preaching in public. So far, we haven’t seen Muslims arrested in London for only preaching a peaceful message. Whether one believes Islam is really peaceful or not is not the only question. And there is no court in Britain or America that has ruled Islam as a violent and intolerant religion. Douglas Murray and others say it is, and their freedom of speech has not been curtailed either. But Islam has not been banned in Europe or the West. So Muslims are not breaking the law by practicing their freedom of speech right or associating with Islamic groups, like CAIR. If that will always be the case of if the nature of some groups changes in the future is another question.


Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

What in the world do you mean what culture is that? Its apart of a terrible cultural practice in the Middle East I thought that was already established. Yes it is something good because it is my way of life and I see it as beautiful and peaceful and if more people embrace that lifestyle then that makes me happy. What propaganda? I'm still itching my head at your ignorance; I don't think you're an idiot though, just misinformed. There is no such thing as forced Islam and most reverts find Islam on their own. Ask me anything, what did I ignore? I apologize if I ignored anything.

She says he is misinformed but not an idiot – that’s nice of her. In fact, she is so nice, that she can’t say anything which would hurt someone’s feelings, so she doesn’t want to tell the truth, which is that there are “beheadings” sometimes a lot, but especially in Iran or “killings” especially in Iran. Also, Saudi Arabia Kills murderers and adulterers, or stones them, which is the same thing, in the end. It is not something we want to happen to anyone, but is the punishment for those crimes, per the sharia. People know that these punishments exist, and in Islam IF ONE DOESN”T KNOW THE PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME< the he is not punished with it. That is COMPLETELY TRUE. I will even swear, it. Islam doesn’t punish someone for adultery if he says he didn’t know that the punishment for adultery existed. The judge is supposed to ask the person if he understands what he did, and if he knew that there is a punishment for it, e.g. did he know if he committed adultery he should be stoned??And KILLED??

If someone claims they didn’t know, and the judge believes them (there is no proof he did know), then he is let go. But the next time, he won’t be as lucky, unless he can prove next time that he forgot, and has a memory loss, which would need a doctor’s witness.

This means, not everything is as “obvious” as one imagines, or that not as many kilings are occurring as one might imagine should be occurring. Yes, a lot of adultery, but the punishments are not as many as the actual cases of adultery. I know this is true, because adultery must be proven with four witnesses, and this is discussed elsewhere in my blog. (I’ll try to leave a link).

Zaha has no problem with saying the Middle East has a culture that permits people to behave horridly. It isn’t about Islam, she says. So, insulting Middle Easter culture is okay, blaming Islam for “beheadings” is wrong.

Whatever one believes about beheadings, they are legal punishments carried out in Muslim countries, like Saudi Arabia and Iran. You can agree or disagree with the laws of other countries, but don’t lie that they don’t exist, or worse, say that the Quran doesn’t permit it. Also, it isn’t only Arab or Middle Eastern or even Muslim majority states which have capital punishment, beheadings might take place as well, certainly hangings are still practiced, and lethal injections and even firing squad are used in different places.

There are no legal slaves in the Middle East or the Gulf States. But I also would be cautious not to say that slavery is “forbidden” because the Quran doesn’t say that. It isn’t permitted in Islam however, to make a free Muslim person a slave. It isn’t permitted to take a Muslim who is already a free person, as a slave. He might have been a slave before, but once he has purchased his freedom or been emancipated by his owner or another person, he is free for the rest of his life. (If a non-believer takes him as a slave, is also something which would have to be discussed separately, but probably Muslims would really look down on a non-believer who takes a free Muslim or person as a slave, but that is what used to happen in the past to people.)

tvee

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S Thanks for your reply and explanation. I read an article in my local newspapers a few months ago, stating that a Muslim organization used an index based on (equality, freedom, etc) to gauge how compliant countries are to Sharia laws and surprisingly they have rated some countries (in Europe and the West) as more Sharia compliant than some Islamic countries. It was interesting. The study was meant as a wake up call to some Muslim countries to do more to tackle poverty, injustice, equality, etc in their countries. I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

There are no Muslims who call themselves Wahabis, this is a misnomer. It is a way to label Sunni Muslims, who are the majority, by the way. Sufis are not hurting anybody, but they are not following Islam as the majority either. You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends, who are all Sunnis. I don't have a problem with someone who practices how he wants but it isn't right to demonize the majority because you don't know Muslims well. Of course you believe so called Salafists or Wahabis are bad, because you believe everything you read about Islam (for the most part) is in the media. You can find many, many Sunnis on the internet and ask them their opinions about issues, and you will find that they also believe in live and let live. They are not out to get you or to Islamize the entire world. We are not ordered to turn everyone into Muslims against their will, it is a small majority of Muslims who actually think like that, or in terms of us and you. Also, I have Turkish women friends and they are just like me and my other friends; they care about the same issues that other Sunnis do. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

By the way, labeliing the majority of Sunnis as "salafist" or "wahabis" is starting to border on hate speech. Sunnis and Sufis all call themselves Muslims, and hardly do they get into discussions about their differences, except as an educational exercise. We are very united in our views and aspirations, but appear to be disunited; the media perpetrates the appearance of great schisms, which don't really exist (or result in disunity) among Muslims in their daily relationships with each other.

I should have siad, it is already at the point where labeling of sunnis occurs, and it borders on hate speech. This is something that has to be addressed in a public sphere. I wish more is said by othes about this problem.

In some previous statements by tvee, which are intersting, quoting a study, he mentions that a study showed that sharia is being practiced more in non-Muslim countries, and the index Does this mean that sharia is good, or that the West is more Islamic only? It appears that the fact that Western or European countries (according to what tvee explains) are more sharia compliant and therefore, also better. This is actually a good sign, then. I would tell +terente P to consider this part of +tvee ‘s remark before saying that Islam is “evil” ( my wording) or anything of that sort.

Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+terente P when you discuss so many facets of the religion in one breath, it is going to confuse. There are punishments for crimes, as you say, but a few countries are punishing some of these criminals, and it is in the Shariah, yes. However, that has nothing to do with the fact that Islam has spread to the West and many people believe in it. Arguing about the right or wrong of the religion isn't going to stop ppl from embracing it. Obviously they think it is good or they wouldn't accept it. The sharia is Islamic law and I don't have to apologize on behalf of Muslim countries which practice it. Yes, you can discuss anything because the internet permits you to. That doesn't mean that you are correct. Anyway, you should not take the spread of Islam as a personal insult. It seems you don't know Muslims well enough to have such a bad opinion of them. +terente P


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

Why do you want to be afraid of anybody, e.g. you say you are an islamophobe and what's wrong with that? +terente P Plenty, I think.


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+Zaha S could you review some of your previous comments, and think about revising? If you are a pious person, you should not say things which are not in accordance with your professed religion. If you are ignorant of your religion, you should learn more about it. You can comment freely to my discussion and I appreciate comments. But do be careful on the net how you frame your discussions. People are very conscious of Islam's power and also wary of it. We should always say what is right, no matter if ppl don't like it or even fight us about it. That is real freedom, not cowering under pressure of some islamophobes and hiding behind false platitudes. +tvee +terente P

Here I merely asked Zaha if she could review some of her comments. Hardly is that rude. Then “think about revising”. Hardly rude. I explain what is real freedom, “not hiding behind false platitudes”. Yes, I accuse her of that,because that’s what she did in her comments. Hiding and denying FACTS. The Qur’an is a book, it is available to read, and all the people know what it says, or they can certainly find a copy and research it.

tvee

Dec 4, 2013

Reply

+Jane Dughatir Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself and read my previous post carefully before asking anyone to "..be care on the net how u frame your discussions." I am well aware that most Muslims are Sunnis (85%), but there are Sunnis who follow a more fundamentalist sects/movements like Wahhabism & Salafism. There are Sufis in both Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam. I never once said Sufis are not Sunnis. I'm well aware that Sufi Muslims are not the majority of the total Muslim population, but they are a significant minority especially in a few Muslim nations. "You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 5, 2013
+tvee I'm sure I was speaking to the other person Zaha S, but just included you as a plus one, sorry for the confusion, or if I made a mistake when I posted the comment. Peace.

(I thought that, first, but then answered him back. However, one or more post/s for Zaha also included a plus and his name, just to allow him to see the discussion; the comment about being careful how she frames the discussion was only meant for her, though I figured the others could also benefit from reading that. It was only in the comment for her and not in a comment for him. Maybe that’s why I got confused about his reply which included my comment to her and not just the comment about his remark, “Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself nd read my previous post carefull”, was his reaction to my telling Zaha to “be careful how she frames her discussion”.

But I did read and understand his post - Which I will explain now in more details.

He greatly implies that Sufis are good Muslims, etc, but then says I shouldn’t say that he said Sufis are “nice”.??!! WHY?? He is also angry that I say he says Sufis are better than Sunnis, who (many of them) follow a sect or movement which is “fundamentalist” (direct quote – “more fundamentalist” read as “extremist”)

To quote him again, “.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.

Now the previous post he made, which has the comments I objected to originally:

"I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)"

He (tvee) said the sufis are the best, right HERE (in the parag above and this one, which are his own words). The Only Islamic tradition he is bolstering in his comment (above) is the Sufi tradition. I was not direct quoting him, even when I said “NICE” and it was just a short paraphrase (so I should have left the quotes out) HE wrote, “The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread” He wrote the above to Zaha, not to me. He praises her highly, “That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE…” blah -blah -blah.

He really means it should be spread, because it has always remained in part of the Islamic world, so it doesn’t need reviving but only spreading. He wishes to have Sufism (so called “Islamic tradition” spread) dominate the Muslim world. To burst his bubble, that isn’t ever going to happen, and thank Allah!! A group (or government even) of sufis will do nothing to bring peace all over the world any more than anyone else can, and they have no practical solutions to offer that aren’t already offered by the sharia. Sharia is the only way to ensure that all people have basic human rights, if it is spread. Sufism isn’t going to spread, so we have to concentrate our efforts on teaching Islam properly, so that it does acquire the recognition and respect it deserves. Islam is the Truth and it is good. I hate to be too preachy here, but that is now my only answer to +Tvee, who abandoned the conversation, after calling me a kafir, lol.


I said: 

Dec 5, 2013

Yes, you implied that sufis are "kind" and so on, while the majority are then not. That's how your comment came off to me, and probably a lot of people would agree if they read it. That's the way I took it because of how you wrote it. So I'm not apologizing for that.I'm not trying to be arrogant, just telling how I see your comment. +tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, which [sic] you by the way gave a lot of praise for, so clearly you are not as educated about what Islam teaches as you are pretending. You both came off as a pair of ignorants, that's my opinion. How you wrote it, comes off as ignorant, all of it. And some of it proves that you are ignorant.

I should have "tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, [whom] you by the way gave a lot of praise for..." but I think its pretty obvious, just a slight error. (Revised - Dec. 7th)

Zaha S, asks:

Yesterday 12:15 AM
"What exactly am I being ignorant about?"

I will end Part Two here, and get back to Zaha's question in Part 3. Also, I will leave this thought, I don't believe what she believes about the sharia, and I don't believe that everyone's perception is another's  illusion. And obvious "truth stands out clear from error" (quran) Truth is not untruth, that  is just nonsense.
 
 And why bolster Sufism alone, there are good Sunnis, many of them (and I am not disputing the claim that most Sufis or even a good majority are Sunnis - they have many strange practices, but for the moment let's say they are Sunnis e.g. Hamza Yusuf is a sufi (or I think he is).  Didn't he also meet commendable and good Turkish people who are not Sufis, but practise Islam? Are they all below his expectations and only Sufis pleased him so immensely, he can't say enough (even in block letters) about them? I find this hard to believe. He is just preaching this to promote sufism, not becasue he loves only Sufis.
 He seems to like Zaha well enough. And even praised her in a similar friendly fashion.
 
I am not stating either that he said anything else bad about Sunnis, but saying that "salafist" or "wahhabi" (which is a misnomer which doesn't mean anything) are extremists is also something I take issue with, and very strongly.
 
(Please Read Part Three to Find out why... next. Yours, J D-N)

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Is Yusuf Estes Muslim?

Pet Peeves

I have some things that get me peeved; it means that my day isn’t completely ruined by them, but that I get “an itch” (the same feeling as when you want to scratch an itch on your body) to do something about what peeved me. For example, I wrote about robots and androids, a long time ago, when I had a blog connected to my Windows Live TM or Windows Live R.

One of my less troublesome pet peeves is that I don’t know and can’t remember what I’m supposed to put at the end of words connected to a registered trademark or words and other things with copyright. - As in the example in the first paragraph (above). Where do I find out about this? The thing is, it isn’t even “bothersome” because I’ve never done anything about this, except attempt to hide my ignorance. I have never been motivated enough to search it on Google (the trademark owners and everyone else know who they are.)

Another of my pet peeves is that most everyone’s websites look better than mine. I am currently following a few blogs, one of them being Yvonne Ridley’s “From Soho 2 Silo” (type Soho, and surprisingly, it isn’t in the computer’s dictionary!) I guess I can live with that.

I don’t particularly like what I have done with my blog, though I think the cloud app is a nice touch, and I like my Mecca Live feed, or video stream (located on the bottom of my blog’s page).It’s not really mine, I just embedded it onto my blog from another location.

But I am going to defend my blog here, because I think at least, it is honest. (Read previous post, or post connected with this idea, about dishonesty or how some websites deliberately (try to) mislead the public or visitors to their website, or blog.

If you hate someone, just come out and say it, dammit!!… Probably the website I mention today by MWFJ is just one example of many.

Also, I don’t like when people say “I hate” this or “I hate” that, or “I hate” someone (LOL)

But seriously, there is enough pain and suffering in the world without this. Hate is a strong word. Those people would do better to think of other ways to express how they feel about something or someone, without resorting to the “H” word.

The final one I’ll mention, although this doesn’t close the book on what I get peeved about, (nor are these necessarily my most troublesome peeves) is trying to reply back to people on the internet, sometimes it is just impossible. Maybe my internet connection is too slow, sometimes the upload is slow, but the download is still moving (albeit very slowly). I’ve noticed that when the upload was zero I couldn’t comment on a video (or something else) Answering emails or replying to comments to me, isn’t being rerouted to the right place? Or there is something I’m not aware of, or a simple way to reply to others which I haven’t figured out.

If you like this blog, you might like “???” (Edit - I’ll post a link here when I find the post I want to connect to).

(Probably people might get peeved when they see that I have not edited or revised something like a direct quote in a post.)

********

I will take this opportunity to ask others to share my previous post about lying websites, e.g. the ones connected to Muslim Witnesses for Justice (MWFJ). DO NOT go to their website or download their Pdf - you are just helping spread their message if you do (Unless you agree with them, in which case I have nothing else to say to you right now.) If you like Yusuf Estes, share my blog, too.

Or better yet, share your favorite Islamic videos and websites (by him).

The “UPDATE”

Currently, it is my thinking that a lot of people don’t know anything about what said group (MWFJ) has to say, so it is counter intuitive to bring it up again, but I am doing this as a public service, so you know. Don’t believe everything you read on the internet, even on my blog. I can also make mistakes and have. Sometimes on my channel or here I will tell you or correct a previous mistake. I might write a separate post clarifying something or correcting something and also do the same on my channel’s (Diamondraw4Real) discussion page, or in a video’s comments, etc. (Also) elsewhere on the net.

I’ve been wondering what to write about recently, until this morning when I read some of the feeds (on my other computer) which I haven’t looked at for the longest time, and discovered that Muslim Witnesses For Justice actually are against Yusuf Estes because of things he may or may not have said or meant in some comments, or in some videos. (I had thought they were in support of him – as you would know if you’ve read the previous post)

Whether Yusuf Estes apologized or not for anything which he might have said doesn’t concern me as much as the fact that there is a ‘witch hunt’ or an ‘inquisition’ to have him ‘blacklisted’. Some would probably like him expelled from the ummah; I think this is going to extremes, and isn’t right. There is a point when you have to live and let live, no matter what your personal beliefs.

Boot Straps

I have many ideas to work with, and notes to type out or revise – it shouldn’t be long before I am back writing and posting regularly to my blog. So, there is a lot to write about, and that’s never a problem for bloggers.

I have had a real problem with motivation, partly due to events this past summer and also because I haven’t been balancing personal and work related matters as well as I should or could. But I still want to give priority to writing blogposts so I will try harder to commit to publishing some posts on a regular basis.

Finally, I want to mention that I’ve been working on a book, which I might do as an e-book – or I might publish it as chapters on the internet. Charles Dickens book(s) was (were) published in newspapers as separate chapters (e.g. Tale of Two Cities or Hard Times) before it (they) was (were) published as a complete work(s). Of course, I won’t publish all of it, but only excerpts, to find out what readers think. This is a big “might”. Just thinking about it makes me stress. I know any time now I will see an ad about how to publish my work as an e-book. That’s how cookies work, and it is both helpful and intrusive at the same time.





Saturday, March 23, 2013

THE 70 virgins explained, in a way.

THE 70 virgins IN HEAVEN EXPLANNING THANKS FOR SMILING THANKS FOR YOUR KIND - YouTube

Hadiths are for Muslims, not for non-Muslims. The major portion of all hadiths is for the Muslims to find out about details they should know or learn for their own practise of the religion. Hadiths about Paradise are not really for non-believers and they shouldn't be reading them, if they don't believe in God at all. I mean, why bother? I don't go reading the Bible every day, which is like a non-believer reading hadiths; a Muslim reading the Bible or new testament, is like a non-believer studying hadiths. They would do better to study the basics of Islam.

The Prophet Muhammad instructed Muslims to invite people to Islam first, if they accept, then to tell them about their Islamic duties, such as prayer, fasting in Ramaadan, etc. and if they comply, then to continue with the next and the next, most imporant things they should know, or things to do. If they don't accept Islam, then they should either (as a dhimmie, or resident of the Islamic state) give less than 2 % of their wealth per year, to avoid army service, or they could help Muslims protect the state they are living in and have a stake in, by joining the army, or volunteering, or what ever the state tells them is necessary to comply with the gov't concerning dhimmies. Don't Muslims in the West also pay taxes? for example.

If the Islamic state is very powerful, then they can meet the non-believers in other countries, or heads of state and again invite them to Islam, if they refuse, they can have a peace treaty, and of course will not be forced to pay as the dhimmies do, because they are governed by the laws of their own state. But a treaty like this will have its own pros and cons as far as what the Islamic state and un-Islamic state agree to; which would also maybe mean their armies working together, and so on.

Allah knows best, and I ask for His mercy when I make a mistake, due to ignorance or forgetfulness. He is the guide.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Promotion - teach Islam with Yusuf Estes original "copyrighted" material

Islamnewsroom.com

This is an exclusive from the original website of Yusuf Estes, the best original argument for why Islam is the most Peaceful religion on Earth today. Don’t be fooled. Read on. Read the entire article, may Allah/God make your heart at ease with this religion and its people. Peace.

(Original version follows)                                                                                                                  J. D-N


What Does Islam Say?

Does it say 'Kill Infidels?' (no)

From "Answering Attacks Against Islam" - by yusuf estes


Question:

How [Do]We Answer Harsh Question and attacks against Islam?

Answer: Begin with the Name of Allah - and ask Him to send peace and blessings upon Muhammad, peace be upon him. And Remember "Allahu 'Alim" - it is only Allah who is the True Knower of all Things.

Someone said, "Your Quran says to kill all the Jews and Christians.."

This is absolutely not true and it is quite easy to prove.

The Quran still exists today just as it did at the time of the prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him. You see, he never did learn how to read or write, so he memorized the entire Quran from the angel Gabriel (Jibril in Arabic) and then he passed on this recition (Quran) to his companions and they in turn passed it on to the next generation and this practice continues even today, reciting by memory and then passing it on to the next generations. And by the way, it is exactly the same from anywhere it is recited in the world.

We know the Quran orders believers to fight in combat against those who are the oppressers, aggressors and terrorists and those who are assaulting and killing the innocent men, women and chldren. But it gives out clear orders - NOT TO Fight against those who are not fighting against you...

Now here is an example of how you might answer those folks with the harsh questions:

First say, "Thank you for your interest in Islam and the Muslims"

Continue, "It is our duty and privilege to present the truth and proof about Islam and what it represents. We desire to clear up misconceptions and misunderstandings about Islam to help others see the true message that came with all of the prophets from Adam, Abraham, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, peace be upon them all."

Now be sure to mention this important point:

"The message is: Laa elaha illa lah (none has the right to be worshipped except Allah)."

Now say,

"And before I begin to answer the question, I would like to ask you a question - 'If you hear something you like in the answer or something that really makes sense to you - then are you prepared(sic) to accept the message of worshipping your Lord without any partners?"

"After all, Islam is really all about this one subject anyway."

Then go to the next important area (misconceptions):

"Now let us correct some mistakes in the 'question' itself. There is not such a meaning in the Quran, ordering or even permitting the Muslims to ever attack innocent people whether they are Christians, Jews, or any other faith for that matter.

Combat is only ordered against those who are attacking or killing the innocent Muslims or fighting against the established Muslim state.

Read...

________________________________________________________

Now here is the answer -

The word used most often in Quran, that is so often mistranslated as kill; slay; or slaughter is not jihad, it is qital and if you look to the Arabic, you will quickly understand this word in today's usage would clearly be combat.

Naturally, just as here in the U.S. we must stand up for righteousness and strive to prevent oppression, aggression and tyranny. This is the proper usage and understanding for this term, as you will discover while passing through the tafseer and explanations by top scholars today.

Scholars of Quran tell us the verses dealing with this topic are specific and not intended to imply a general meaning for just anyone to decide to go around combating non-Muslims. The early Muslims had been driven out of their homes and turned out into the desert to starve. After finally, relocating in Medina, verses came in Quran instructing them to make hajj (pilgrimage) back to Makkah. Finding their way blocked and after several years of making agreements and treaties that the others continually broke, the Muslims were at last, told they could now fight in combat against the tyrants who had so horribly mistreated and abused them in the past. However, this would only be acceptable to Allah if they remained within very specific limitations. The word "qital" in Arabic in this instance refers to "combat" rather than what some have used "kill" because the word "kill" is far to general, while the word "combat" appropriately describes what is intended by the usage in this passage. Allah Knows Best.

It should also be noted the usage of the word "fitnah" in the same verse denotes a horrible condition, not unlike what we find today when there is terrorism and tyranny against the moral and just society at large. It would be easy to properly understand the meaning as, "Engage them in combat, even killing them, until the state of "fitnah" (terrorism) no longer exists in the society and people are free to worship Allah by their choice."

We can see these verse are not designed to promote terrorism, but rather these are very orders from Above to the Muslims to be the first of those who stand out aggressively against all forms of terrorism and oppression.

Once this is in place, there really isn't a question anymore, due to the necessity as we see today, to prevent and subdue enemies of freedom, liberty and justice. In other words, we could easily say Allah ordered believers in the Quran to wage combat against terrorism - 14 centuries ago. And the "struggle against oppression, terrorism and tyranny" in the Arabic language, it is called, "Jihad."

I tell them,

"Islam declared the WAR ON TERRORISM - over 1,400 years ago!"

________________________________________________________

Details: read explanation of Quran for verses, 2:189-193 at: www.QTafsir.com

It is time to visit our website and download or bookmark our free copy of translation of Quran... First thing you do is download the Quran from our site at:

www.allahsquran.com/goodies/free.php
Then go to the verse in question and read the Arabic, then the English, then the transliteration (making the sounds with English letters). Then compare the meaning to what you have pronounced.

Here are a few of the misquoted verses:

Verses containing the word "Qital" (fighting in combat)

2.190 Fight (in combat) in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress.

2.191 And kill them (in combat) wherever you overtake them and expel them from wherever they have expelled you, and

2.193 Fight them (in combat) until there is no more 'fitnah' [agression, oppression and terrorism] and worship is allowed for Allah.

2.216 Fighting (in combat) has been enjoined upon you while it is hateful to you. But perhaps you hate a thing and it is good for you; and

2.217 They ask you about the sacred month – about fighting (in combat) therein. Say, "Fighting therein is great [sin],

2.244 And fight (in combat) in the cause of Allah and know that Allah is Hearing and Knowing.

2.246 Have you not considered the assembly of the Children of Israel after [the time of] Moses when they said to a prophet of theirs, "Send to us a king, and we will fight (in combat) in the way of Allah"?

3.13 Already there has been for you a sign in the two armies which met [in combat in Badr] – one fighting (in combat)

3.111 They will not harm you except for [some] annoyance. And if they fight you (in combat) , they will show you their backs;

3.142 Or do you think that you will enter Paradise while Allah has not yet made evident those of you who fight (in combat) in His cause and

3.156 O you who have believed, do not be like those who disbelieved and said about their brothers when they traveled through the land or went out to fight (in combat) , "If they

3.167 And that He might make evident those who are hypocrites. For it was said to them, "Come, fight (in combat) in the way of Allah or

4.74 So let those fight (in combat) in the cause of Allah who sell the life of this world for the Hereafter. And he who fights in the cause of Allah

4.75 And what is [the matter] with you that you do not fight (in combat) in the cause of Allah

4.76 Those who believe fight (in combat) in the cause of Allah, and those who disbelieve fight in the cause of taghūt. So fight against the allies of Satan.

4.77 Have you not seen those who were told, "Restrain your hands [from fighting] and establish prayer and give zakah"? But then when fighting (in combat) was ordained for them, at once a party of them feared men as they fear Allah or with

4.84: So fight (in combat), in the cause of Allah; you are not held responsible except for yourself. And encourage the believers

4.90: Except for those who take refuge with a people between yourselves and whom is a treaty or those who come to you, their hearts strained at [the prospect of] fighting you (in combat) or fighting their own people..

4.94: O you who have believed, when you go forth [to fight (in combat)] in the cause of Allah, investigate; and do not say to one who gives you [a greeting of] peace "You are not a believer,"

5.24 : They said, "O Moses, indeed we will not enter it, ever, as long as they are within it; so go, you and your Lord, and fight (in combat). Indeed,

8.39 : And fight them (in combat) until there is no fitnah [agression, oppression & terrorism] and [until] the religion, all of it, is for Allah. And if they cease – then indeed, Allah is Seeing of what they do.

• 8.65: O Prophet, urge the believers to combat. If there are among you twenty (who are) steadfast, they will overcome two hundred...

• 8.74: But those who have believed and emigrated and fought in the cause of Allah and those who gave shelter and aided - it is they who are the believers, truly. For them is forgiveness and noble provision.

• 8.75: And those who believed after (the initial emigration) and emigrated and fought (in combat) with you - they are of you…

• 9.5: And when the sacred months have passed, then engage the pagans in mortal combat wherever you find them and capture them and desiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush. But if they should repent, establish salat (proper worship) and give charity, let them (go) on their way.

• 9.12: And if they break their oaths after their treaty and defame your religion, then fight the leaders of disbelief, for indeed, there are no oaths (sacred) to them; (fight them) so the will stop.

9.13: Would you not fight a people who broke their oaths and determined to expel the Messenger, and they had begun (attacking) you the first time? Do you fear them? …

• 9.14: Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them…

• 9.29: Fight those who do not believe in Allah or in the Last Day and who do not consider unlawful what Allah and His Messenger have made unlawful and who do not adopt the religion of truth from those who were given the Scripture – [fight] until they give the jizyah willingly while they are humbled.

• 9.36: Indeed, the number of months with Allah is twelve [lunar] months in the register of Allah [from] the day He created the heavens and the earth; of these, four are sacred. That is the correct religion, so do not wrong yourselves during them. And fight against the disbelievers collectively as they fight against you collectively.

In each case, the use of the words in English for battle, combat, fight and so on - is actually only one word in Arabic - 'qital'.

Perhaps the best way to understand a single word in today's English would be 'combat' or 'military combat' or even 'mortal combat'. (like Jihad, also, though qital is specific to combat, and not used to mean broadly "any" striving, such as "striving with their wealth and lives" - DD)

In all the cases it is to be understood as military engagement in battle or war.
(Reference: www.AllahsQuran.com/read in the search box, type the word 'fight')

Now notice the actual word 'jihad' - for example in chapter and verse - 9.44 Those who believe in Allah and the Last Day would not ask permission from you to be excused from 'striving' with their wealth and their lives. And Allah is Knowing of those who fear him.

Check out www.AboutJihad.com

We pray to Allah to make it easy for all of us to find the correct meanings and teachings of Islam and allow us to share Islam with others, and forgive our mistakes and grant us His Paradise, ameen.

Permission to copy & distribute (with limits)

Yusuf Estes says: "I give full permission to use any and all of my writings and recordings without copyrights for anyone who is engaged in presenting the true message of the peace of Islam, provided it is done without charge and there are no alterations, additions or deletions. (signed) Yusuf Estes, February 22, 2012"

Answers: www.JustAskislam.com

Free Quran: www.FreeQuran.org

http://www.linkstoislam.com/ (another good website by Yusuf Estes - DD)


If You Care - You Share

COMMENTS

FACEBOOK - TWITTER - Chatrooms