Showing posts with label Jane. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jane. Show all posts

Thursday, January 23, 2014

What it means to have a festival

I'll be sharing more older posts for the rest of January, sharing more comments from Google+ and tying into Islamic subjects that are of interest to the wider public.
Can't think of much off the top of my head, except the writing I've saved onto the home PC, for the moment, but I'm sure I can come up with other interesting original things to say soon. Insha Allah.

Today, "What It Means To Have A Festival" about the problems at a cultural event held in the US, which had (I'm guessing, educatedly) both Arab Christians and Arab Muslims, and many non Arab Americans.
Probably some bigotry or hate on both sides who were involved.

More bitmaps for readers, about the blog, comments and stats. Also bitmaps from Twitter, which are a new thing on the blog I'm introducing and will try to do more of in the future as well.

Since I can't comment on google+ these days, I have other ways to get around that by sharing on the blog, but probably there is a solution to that; also, readers comments welcome on the blog. I have commented myself here, so don't see why others can't or are unable. Maybe that's not so?


Also, photos and video this week.



Comments on blogger


Friday, January 10, 2014

Bigger and Smaller

Bigger Is Better Most Often

I was in the mall with the family last night, and noticed the size of things.

The TVs, both Samsung, were huge! 64 and 65 inches wide, and I think one of them was 3D but I didn’t have my glasses.

The cars, not far off, for children, were tiny replicas of the real things, and so adorable (of course (because) they were small.)! I didn’t point them out to my nearly six yr. old, of course, because he would’ve wanted one in a Bahrain minute. He has a less realistic car of his own, which is battery operated, with one of those “big” batteries.

In fact, since I was a girl, I remember liking small things a lot. Now whenever I reminisce about my childhood, I often think of things in terms of size, if not just the feelings of nostalgia, sadness, anger, betrayal, and/or the many unsavory things about being a child. I can honestly say at one point in my life, which (actually) lasted several years, (I should call it a phase, but that doesn’t seem to do justice to the fact that I was a victim during this period, which seemed lengthy) I “hated” my two younger brothers.

I wanted to be a knight, I made myself a castle with little people, drawn on the inner walls of the fortified building with crayons, and also furnishings which were medieval looking, and made a drawbridge door, which compared to the castle, was big, but which I would never have actually fit in myself. I think I entered the box somehow, which had delivered some appliance or other, by getting into it via another bigger space, like the top or side of the carton.

I wanted a real dollhouse with running water, when I saw one on television, with plumbing, lights and all the modern amenities; I was a teen by then.

I liked to escape into fantasy land, which is why I guess, small things seemed to help connect to the imagination. I guess many kids who had grown up with Mr. Dressup might’ve done equally imaginative things like make horses out of snow, which didn’t have a head, or tail, just a big body growing out of the frozen ground. Who needs toys, or expensive stuff, when imagination will do more wonders?

I saw an ad, for a television, in which the guy who is in a small chair, and could be a real short person, which for men means less than 5 ft 2 inches, women are short if they are less than 4 ft 8 inches, is facing the hugest screen I’ve ever seen, nor imagined, in my life. I think there is a limit to how big you want your home television.

But that’s just me.

The ad could’ve been one of those photo shopped thingies.

I guess advertising also imagines a world where anything is possible.

But my world doesn’t have room for a product that big, nor does my mind, which imagines all kinds of possibilities for what would happen if I actually could afford to own such a thing, and bring it home. Unless my kids are (suddenly) also very good at visualizing themselves actually sitting still in front of a television when they are not squabbling or throwing or kicking a ball, I don’t see it!

P.S. thanks for the teeny tiny trunk, that was hers and now is mine, mom.

(My son is visiting this week and brought greetings and gifts.)



Friday, January 3, 2014

The Longest Post Ever - 3 Parts

Why I Believe in God – Part One


I’m adding or expanding a few points from my last post, a response to an article CNN chose as one of the top for 2013, by an atheist mother, called, “Why I Am Raising My Child without God”.

My God is not an “Angry God”.

Allah, is my God, He is the Creator and Sustainer. He is the Lord of the Universe, my “Rabb” and the lord of all.

What people get angry about - parking tickets and tsunamis God doesn’t get angry about. God isn’t like people.

People get angry about Islamic law (sharia) and the freedom of speech or freedom of religion of Muslims in non-Muslim countries. Muslims get angry about America’s dominance and policing of the world, or the patriot act; so do many non-Muslims.

God mentions things he has forbidden, in the Quran, it is the final revelation; Jews and Christians may drink alcohol, but in Islam it is forbidden; we say it is the “mother of all evils”, as the Prophet Muhammad, pbuh, taught.

Allah forbids usury, or interest. Many Jews and Christians see nothing wrong with it; in Islam it is considered such a grave sin that it is equated with incest; a man sleeping with his mother 36 times, in Ahadith (the prophetic narrations). Allah hates interest and punishes those who deal in interest (Riba in Arabic).

If you get angry, does that mean people call you an “angry person”? No.

Then why do people call God an “angry” god? They think they have the right to judge God, even a god they don’t believe in.
In the bible or Old Testament, God is described as such  "Your God is an angry god", so maybe that's one reason this is said a lot. (sorry if that's not the exact quote).
********

Atheists argue against all religion based on some of their misconceptions about God, which largely are inherited or passed down to them through their passive knowledge (or knowledge they gained sometime in their lives when they used to believe, before they rejected God; maybe they were Christians, or Jews, or other ). Armed with this knowledge, passive or past experience, they believe they are well equipped to argue against all religion, and against the existence of a Supreme Universal God or Supreme Being.



God is not like people, “there is nothing like unto Him”.

God is the Judge, therefore who can judge Him?

The believers probably will unanimously agree that we don’t tell God what to do, but that He has every right (and it is His dominion alone) to tell us what to do, how to live, and what we should believe. The fact that there are numerous religions doesn’t bother most believers. They all believe they are on the right path.

Muslims, believe that Islam is the correct religion, largely because they have the “final revelation” which they believe has no errors, is divinely revealed word, is the Word of God Almighty, without error, and is basically a continuation of what was revealed before it; the reason for the new revelation was to right the wrongs of the other religions, namely Jewish and Christian faiths which had deviated from the correct teachings, and whose people deviated from the correct path as a result of their books being corrupted.

For example Islam teaches that the Jews changed their books, “what your own hands have wrought” and Christians worship Jesus, for the same reason, having adopted the attitude/belief about Christ as the savior. Their original teachings were corrupted by the central idea/belief that Jesus, A.S., is the savior of mankind.

Blood sacrifice, or the death/crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus, A.S., as well as the errors contained in the Bible, point to the fact that the Bible was corrupted sometime after Jesus parted with his people. There are errors in the accounts as well as many nonsensical or even mathematical and scientific errors in the Bible.

Atheists believe that believers in God accept that God is vengeful or unmerciful; or they think we turn a blind eye to these “faults”.

But God doesn’t have any faults. Therefore we, as imperfect beings are not ones to judge God. I mentioned some of the peoples’ complaints against God, that He permits tsunamis, natural disasters and the like, or that He punishes for sins; Allah does as He wills. It isn’t proper for the creation to complain to the Creator about “faults” they suppose He has. That being the case, there is Wisdom behind everything that Allah does or His rule.

********

Human beings are such that they “appreciate” and show “gratitude”, these qualities which we have, are a part of our slavery to Allah. The fact that we show gratitude, thanks, appreciation and so on really impresses upon us, that we are in some ways needy, feeble, and we are therefore greatly lacking in some things, to varying degrees; even our wealth which some people have more than others, is ours from Allah. We are therefore thankful to Him even more than we are thankful to any others. It is an unislamic character that doesn’t show gratitude for blessings or favors, whether that is a blessing from Allah or a favor someone has been able to do for someone/people.

Allah is the Lord of the Universe, therefore His status is more than that of any worldly King or ruler, and He is “the King of Kings”, according to Islamic teachings. Allah’s designation, which He informs us about, and all his personal names and attributes are His and His alone, though human beings can possess similar attributes, theirs are not perfect like that of Allah’s.

When we get angry, sometimes our anger is not wholly just but is the result of other emotions too, such as jealousy. Being angry for the sake of Allah therefore is more important and just than anger for mere personal interests, such as one’s “self-dignity” or a mere “image”. The Prophet, pbuh, therefore, didn’t get angry for himself, nor retaliate for himself, and due to this quality he even forgave the Meccans who had persecuted himself, in particular, such as Hind, Abu Sufyan and other notables of the grandest tribes, who were debased by the Muslims stunning turnaround in the war arena and eventually on the day of the conquest on their victory at Mecca, in a bloodless assault on the Holy city. Most of the people embraced Islam willingly after having seen the evident signs, on that day.

The people show gratitude to each other, but to God we should be most grateful. He is the one who gives us life, permits us to live in peace (or if necessary, permits us to fight for our own defense), gives us blessings in abundance, and we can’t deny them; even the oxygen we breathe is one of His blessings. Then how can we be so stingy in our thanks to the Lord who provides us form the time we take our first breath?

Yes, the reason is that instead of being grateful the people are angry. Their anger isn’t for themselves only, but for what they see as divine injustice. But being that they don’t claim to believe in any “God”, they say that “God” doesn’t exist. They want to ignore God, because they judge Him to be ‘cruel’ or ‘unmerciful’, or the idea of a God as preposterous, because a God who is supposed to be “perfect” or “merciful” and “loving” wouldn’t permit disasters or atrocities.

The atheists no doubt believe that the “natural disasters” (which often others claim are retribution for sins) are proof that God doesn’t exist, or that the God Christians and Muslims, and others believe in must not love us. (It is difficult to argue what atheists believe because they have no belief, except the lack of belief; they believe in “nothing” except this life.)

Is it logical to believe in nothing? Or is it more “comforting”? No, to both, I think.

It is no more “logical” to believe in the idea that the universe came out of nothing, than it is to believe that there is a Creator who made everything from nothing.

Why atheists have a stubborn attitude to this is obvious; they lack faith, purely and simply. But to call belief “illogical” is not acceptable to believers. It isn’t universally or widely held that there is no God. In fact, it is only recently that more and more people claim to believe in no God.

The fact that something is becoming more prevalent also doesn’t prove it is true.
-

While the Muslims point to the Quran as “a book without error”, there is nothing the atheists can point to as fact, which proves that God doesn’t exist; I recently blogged or shared some videos (in 1-3 parts) which have an explanation about Darwinism or discussion which shows that Darwinism, natural selection are not proven by science, nor does it seem possible for the necessary “biological algorithms” to ever materialize which would prove natural selection is even remotely real or possible.

A creation points to a Creator, it would seem, is more than logical, and more believable than that an algorithm for Darwin’s theory of natural selection will happen, since it has not to date been seen to occur. Mathematical algorithms have proven gravity, but no biological algorithm has proven natural selection, according to French and other experts, as discussed in the video (part one).

It is fair to say, moreover, that the insistence by many of the truth of natural selection is therefore as illogical (or unlikely) as the belief in (or existence of) many gods.

Muslims often say that the Quran is a miracle, contains scientific facts, or is not contradictory to science, at least. But what atheists point to in natural selection isn’t at all conclusive. So, they are not at all correct in their stand; they have no right to abuse believers, who believe in a Creator, while there is a creation, yet they believe in a theory which has no proof, though other theories have been proven long ago, much more easily, by other kinds of algorithms or by (other) scientific means.

A God who is Perfect or All Knowing or Capable can perform miracles, or prophets can perform miracles by such a God’s leave, but science cannot make a perfect model for natural selection. Then how can the disbelievers claim that an entire universe can arise from nothing?

********

Degrees of Disbelief:

Disbelievers argue that there is no God. Others are not true atheists, but are fence sitters, who are agnostic, meaning they are not sure that a God exists. Or so I have come to think of agnostics (in that way).

Anyway, it is such people not sure what they believe about the existence of a Supreme Being who ask, “If God exists, why does He permit suffering”.

I said, last time, that “suffering” is nothing “illogical”, that it is in fact quite commonplace, and therefore it is part of our human condition. Animals, as well suffer in this earthy existence.

Unlike animals, people are responsible for their sins, and for belief in God. Animals also believe in God, and they worship Him, although we cannot perceive this, some ppl point to how camels kneel, or praying mantis "pray", etc. But in Islam, we know this because of the teachings of the Holy Prophet, pbuh. A similitude to how animals believe, and praise God or worship, is like the animals who rely on their Lord for sustenance, and they always find it, unless it is their time to die, in which case they may die from hunger or thirst, but mostly animals also die from other causes. In any case, when their time is up, their time is up; they cannot delay death, just as humans cannot delay death. These are matters which are decided by God, even before we are born. Since such creatures owe their existence and sustenance to the Creator, it follows that they also worship the Creator. In this they have a common “slave” status like humans. But they generally do not deviate from the nature which Allah created them with. On the other hand, humans often do.

There is a tradition which tells that on the Day of Judgment the animals will also be judged; they will take their rights from the other animals, so that the horned sheep will be punished by the not horned sheep for what it did to the other, and the not clawed or not fanged animals, will retaliate against the injustice they suffered. But then the animals will die, and they will not enter either Paradise or Hell. (Revise)

People will however receive a divine, lasting reward or punishment, or a punishment of some severity or length, after which they will be permitted into Paradise, if they are believers.

Part Two – Suffering is Inevitable

That suffering happens, is one problem people have with religions. Does this mean God doesn’t love the believers? Maybe God doesn’t love the non-believers, is true, but why also make believers who claim that God loves them, or children who are innocent, suffer? Does Allah permit suffering because He doesn’t care about us?

This is a question which bothers many people, even believers. But Allah’s names and attributes tell us about Allah. If we don’t know these names or attributes, we will forever be confused about Allah. Therefore we should learn about these, and to learn the names of Allah is very beneficial and rewardable.

Allah permits people to live and die, moreover, He answers prayers.

We see that Allah is Merciful, Al Rahman, Al Raheem, two qualities of mercy, which are His and no one else is equally capable of; He is merciful to creatures in this life, and also, to the believers especially, on the Day of Judgment. 99 per cent of His mercy is for the believers on the Day of Judgment.

The smallest and greatest things are under His control; His is the only (real or undeniable) authority. He is All Powerful.

Keeping this in mind, how can we judge Allah, knowing that He knows everything; He is the knower of the “unseen”, the future, for example, as well as every hidden thing, no matter how small.

A story (a man called Al Khudr, who teaches Moses what Allah has revealed to him of wisdom, and the unseen) demonstrates that because of this All Knowing nature specific to the Lord of the Universe, He is the only one capable of judging mankind. He is the only one aware of all, no matter how miniscule or imperceptible, our sins, the great and small ones, our dreams and aspirations or our wishes, whether good or evil, our inclinations, our thoughts, and our hearts. Therefore, who is better to judge us than Allah?

Also, Allah tells us, “I am nearer to my slave than his jugular vein”.


********

 
God Is Logical and Just: Some Questions for Further Study:

- God has special knowledge we don’t. He doesn’t have to be present with us, to know our sins, but angels are appointed for us. Why??

- Intimate knowledge is a wrong expression; yes or no? God doesn’t see or watch us committing evil such as fornication, or when we go to the bathroom, but everything which will occur is written, as Allah ordered the “pen” to “write”. When he said to Jesus, “be”, Jesus came into existence, the angel blew into the sleeve of the honorable and chaste slave girl of Allah, Maryam, A.S., and she conceived Jesus, A.S. Allah decrees, and the angels do as they are told.

God is Merciful – But:

God is merciful to His creatures, but on Day of Judgment He rewards the Muslims/believers for their good deeds and/or forgives the sins they accumulated. This is the meaning of Al Rahman (and) Al Raheem.

Non-believers or weak faithful wonder why Allah permits suffering, or inflicts natural disasters on sinful people, while innocent children or other people suffer due to their relationship to such people, or because they live in communities where natural disasters often occur, such as earthquakes in China, or Tsunamis in Philippines or Bangladesh. Why do the beloved also suffer as much as the ones God doesn’t love, such as the sinful or heedless of God?

We can understand this better if we look at this question from the perspective of God, of a Creator who is Just and who knows everything.

“Allah knows when a leaf falls”. Allah has perfect knowledge; therefore, His Knowing prevents Him from injustice to his creatures. Also, His mercy prevents his injustice to His creatures.

“They earned what their hands have wrought”

Muslims also commit sins, and yet they are sometimes forgiven, and sometimes they must receive a punishment, and then they will enter Paradise. Some people are punished in this life only, others receive a punishment in the grave, and others go to Hellfire for a time, while the non-believers will remain in Hell for eternity.

“Allah’s command is just”.

Muslims also may wish to be forgiven, but if they rely on Allah’s mercy without repenting or changing their ways, then they cannot depend on His forgiveness as a foregone conclusion, but just the opposite is likely to occur, and they may end up in Hell.

********

Allah does not break His promise, therefore all Muslims/believers will enter Paradise, because they have said (and believed) La ilaha il Allah “There is no god (worthy of worship) but Allah” and if they have heard the message of the final Messenger, say, “(and) Muhammadur rasool allah” (Muhammad is the Messenger of allah).

That Allah doesn’t go back on His promise is also a mercy and just. It would be injustice if He didn’t, but Allah is above such a thing.

But Allah told Adam and Eve that when they go down to the earth, they would be enemies with the devil (Iblees) “get ye down altogether…”

He forewarned them that they should be wary of the devil, and to follow the guidance which He promised to send. Therefore, throughout the ages, prophets and Messengers have been sent to the people, so that they would have guidance. If they reject this guidance, Allah tells them they will be punished, “A just reward”.

From the believers’ point of view, this makes sense. Good is rewarded, and evil is punished; God has not left us without guidance, therefore when we follow His guidance we are right and when we don’t follow His guidance we are wrong. It is very few people who can innately do good and avoid evil, without having guidance. Inevitably people without guidance make mistakes or commit sins.

If Allah didn’t punish the guilty while he rewarded the good (only), then that would not be just either. If Allah didn’t forewarn His slaves (people or jinns) then, they would have reason to complain, or say that He didn’t give them the guidance with which to oppose evil, for example. If he didn’t send a book or a prophet to a nation, they would have a right to complain that they were not sent any guidance with which to learn the difference between good and evil, which isn’t something easily discerned in many cases.

We see how interest is destructive to the economy, yet non-believers continue to deal in usury. They are blind to the fact that it is an evil and is destructive. They insist on economies and financial systems built on interest, despite the fact their economies suffer for it. They seem to be blind to the evils of dealing in interest altogether, which is why they rarely are able to see the benefits of Islamic finance, or they refuse to leave it, even though they might also see the benefits of Islamic finance. In the same way, people are often misled by the devil or prefer evil deeds to good deeds. Many people prefer dating, to early marriage, or a life in the priesthood or as a nun, to marriage and children. They perceive that these things are what they want and must be good, because they like and see nothing wrong with them, but really these are practices which are deviations from the true nature of human beings. Inevitably we see problems in societies which permit a great deal of mixing between the sexes, or certain practices which insist on total abstinence and/or isolation from society, whether the majority of the members of those societies believe these are good or not.

How many problems do societies live with just because they have not followed the previous guidance, or they forgot their duty to Allah? We see that the more Muslims forget their religion and stumble through life, the more they suffer just as the non-believers, and in the same ways. The Quran tells, “You (Muslims) will follow the path of those who went before you”. Allah doesn’t say that all the Muslims will follow the ways of non-Muslims, but that groups or some generations of Muslims in some places will follow the ways of the non-believers.


Because Belief IS Logical:

Muslims believe that belief in God is logical, so to argue that it isn’t is not something they are open to. They believe that atheists’ arguments against God and in favor of evolution and other unproven “theories” are illogical. These two groups rarely can agree on anything, I think.

Even among non-believers, there are varying opinions about what is just or what is right. Their disputes with each other about right and wrong are also hotly debated everywhere (but less so than creationism or evolution) among non-believers about what is “moral” or what is “just”. They can only debate these questions of morality, but cannot impose their own opinions on other non-believers, no more than they can impose their objection to the existence of a Creator on Muslims. Some non-Muslims are adamant that homosexuality is a sin, but it is difficult to convince an atheist who has no fear of god, that such a lifestyle is “immoral”. They believe in the individual’s right to do as they wish, as long as they do not hurt others. This is why premarital sex is also not anything wrong in their view. If their views are not the majority view, they will naturally become very antagonistic; we can see evidence on Islamic sites or posts on the internet of this, and trolling, etc.

But Belief is Logical; many people insist that we don’t have to see God to believe in God, nor do we have to understand God. Most believers follow the teachings of their spiritual leaders, or an institution, such as the Orthodox Church, or the Orthodox traditions in their own country, or which they follow. Still, other believers follow their conscience as much as they follow any of the scriptures which they claim to believe. They are not as fundamentalist as others of their fellow believers or many who are fervent believers in a specific church, or a certain sect, for example.

To many a believer, it is often more important that they are sincere to their beliefs and values, than to any notion that all people must follow the right guidance, or a specific path to salvation.

Many claim to follow the right guidance, but all of them cannot possibly be doing that; there is only one religion acceptable to Allah/God, isn’t there?

Anyone who believes that there is only one God worthy of worship and is a true monotheist, should also realize that God sent the world a message - He sent a final Messenger with this guidance to teach the people, that is Muhammad ibn Abdullah, the seal of all the Prophets. His specific message and life has reached to all the corners of the world today.

Part Three:

Do we have the right to claims superior knowledge or wisdom to a God who has sent us Messengers throughout the ages and revealed Himself to us in His books? What is the proof that this God doesn’t exist?

It is a well-known thing that the atheists say that just because in every previous generation and throughout history people have believed in a Supreme Being or a Creator that doesn’t prove that God really exists; the genetic fallacy, e.g. people all over the world believe in god, therefore, that means they have all heard the same stories about a “God” who created the Universe and everything in it, therefore this belief is a well spread “myth”.

But philosophers can argue that just because something exists all over doesn’t mean it isn’t true. Where is the proof that belief (in god or a creator) is based on falsehood? That’s the meaning of a “genetic fallacy”.

Almost similar to this is the atheistic belief that since God should be merciful (or people believe He is, if He is a true God) then He would not punish us for our sins; but the fact is God does punish sins, and sometimes we don’t like this. That doesn’t mean we can argue with God - we cannot, and we are just His ‘slaves’. Being slaves, we have no say in what is just or unjust, and we can’t even know many times, what is just or what is unjust. This is already explained in the previous post.

Then, it isn’t logical to say that because God is just he isn’t merciful or because He is merciful He isn’t just. God is both. If he didn’t punish evil, or allow the destruction of sinful people, even though among them are some good people, then the world would become more and more corrupt; people and nations don’t seem altogether capable of justice or goodness do they? Therefore, they must be checked, and one way of checking them is through trials or disasters. Even the “rotten apples” will make the bunch rotten, or isn’t that the case?

The fact that innocent people live among evil people, doesn’t mean that God is not merciful for also taking their lives, or that He is the cause of their suffering. If they lived among good people, maybe they would not suffer so much. In any case, God is not unjust.

Allah says to the believers, “the earth is spacious”, and so we are encouraged to migrate to places where we are free to practice our religion. It is highly desirable to live among other believers and those of similar faith or sect. Most people of all faiths are naturally attracted to those people they share a common belief with.

********

To say that God is unjust or unmerciful, while we see how merciful and just He is in reality, means we are deliberately denying God’s many blessings and closing our eyes to the truth in front of us. The atheists will no doubt think this is a useless argument, but to others who are confused about this question (why God permits suffering), this might help them understand.

People complain against “a god” who is “invisible”, “not here” who would punish “innocent” people and allow suffering to occur, yet demand us to worship Him, and who is described by the believers as “a merciful god”. They are really complaining against God, but they think they are complaining against a fictional being, idea or a “myth”. The fact that there are disbelievers doesn’t prove the non-existence of God however.

Nor does the dislike of pain prove the non-existence of god, nor does the abundance of blessings support the non-existence of god, nor does the spread of wealth or the rise in crime prove the non-existence of God. God exists; therefore nothing disproves the existence of God.

If suffering proves anything it is that this life is not a dream, that we do exist and are not just people in someone else’s dream. What is more logical? Yet, non-believers in the past used to even discuss the possibility, or philosophize about whether “the creation” actually exists at all in reality (in time and space as we know it to be today through advances in scientific discover).

Because there are algorithms which can prove that gravity is real, or is not just a theory (therefore it must be true) and truth equals reality, therefore, it is even more important to discover and state once and for all whether biological algorithms prove Darwin’s theory of “natural selection”. If they don’t, then people should stop claiming that natural selection is a proven theory, it isn’t; in fact, it is more than likely not ever going to be proven, no matter what other advances we see in science, or the existence of more advanced computers and computer programs. The same can be said for “evolution” then.

I suffer therefore I am:

Suffering is part of life; who is in a position to say, really, that fear and pain are not (equally legitimate) a part of life as much as happiness? Just because we don’t like something doesn’t mean it isn’t good for us. Also, just because we like something doesn’t mean it is good for us. “God knows and you do not know”.

Even it must be a genetic fallacy to assume that because people claim things about God or many believers say things about God that that proves the “angry” nature of god, “jealousy” of god, or any other similar accusations against god we hear. Just because people cannot explain God, or are not able to explain in words what “faith” is or even the correct teachings of their own religion, doesn’t prove that God doesn’t exist. Some of this proves that people often don’t know their own religion’s teachings, or want to deny them, but it doesn’t prove that there is no God.

Pending:

Names and Attributes of Allah, by Sheikh Ibn Al-Qayyim, “Madarij al Saalikeen”.

Conclusion:

A good number of non-Muslims, and atheists, etc., all say wrong or disparaging things about Islam, its prophet, and God. But they are not fair in doing so; in fact they are quite unjust and wrong in their assumptions and beliefs about Islam. They are uneducated about Islam yet speak freely about their misconceptions, and spread lies, furthermore.



That's my "ninja way"

List of blogposts to put into draft and repost as originals again.


INBOX, The Confusion of the Confusion, so many other ones, crap!

Thinking about changing some settings… I might have to do the unthinkable and disconnect the blog from the profile page, and google activity, Hmhmm.

Enough feeling sorry for myself; I promised to blog about something so here goes nothing.

********

“Play it again” Jane



I’m posting this reply from December’s discussion and on my blog, so that all who partake of the discussion will understand my position, and can get a sense of what I am dealing with regards the issue of “us vs. them”, which many people claim is the Muslims’ fault (Sunnis particularly). I didn’t reply to all of the arguments, so I am doing that now (January 3rd), because I think it is needed. Not everyone will go to my blog to read the entire argument, which ran three posts in December. So, here is the rest of my argument (which will be posted on the blog and in Google share) in a nutshell:



To quote him [+tvee] again, “.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.



Now the previous post he made, which has the comments I objected to originally:

[Many readers have read this before; next I will be discussing what Terente P said, why he is wrong, and more (since I put my back against the wall) about the atheist mom’s arguments against God will also follow, today/tonite - though I might later revise, because it isn’t perfect, and needs more…]

[Anyway, “that’s my ‘ninja way’” (Naruto)

Previously on Google shares...
"I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)"
He (tvee) said the sufis are the best, right HERE (in the paragraph above and this one, which are his own words). The Only Islamic tradition he is bolstering in his comment (above) is the Sufi tradition. I was not direct quoting him, even when I said “NICE” and it was just a short paraphrase (so I should have (or maybe did, can’t recall) left the quotes out) HE wrote, “The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread” He wrote the above to Zaha, not to me. He praises her highly, “That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE…” blah -blah -blah.
He really means it should be spread, because it has always remained in part of the Islamic world, so it doesn’t need reviving but only spreading. He wishes to have Sufism (so called “Islamic tradition” spread) dominate the Muslim world. To burst his bubble, that isn’t ever going to happen, and thank Allah!! A group (or government even) of sufis will do nothing to bring peace all over the world any more than anyone else can, and they have no practical solutions to offer that aren’t already offered by the sharia. Sharia is the only way to ensure that all people have basic human rights, if it is spread. Sufism isn’t going to spread, so we have to concentrate our efforts on teaching Islam properly, so that it does acquire the recognition and respect it deserves. Islam is the Truth and it is good. I hate to be too preachy here, but that is now my only answer to +Tvee, who abandoned the conversation, after calling me a kafir, lol.
I'm including Terente P's name in the labels, so maybe people can check out his page, too, which has three followers, last I looked, including me and an old Muslim pensionser... you can spam him, lol.
-
Many readers have read this before; next I will be discussing what Terente P said, why he is wrong, and more (since I put my back against the wall) about the atheist mom’s arguments against God will also follow, today/tonite - though I might later revise, because it isn’t perfect, and needs more…

Anyway, “that’s my ‘ninja way’” (Naruto)



Don't Be Alarmed..

I wanted to share a bunch of stuff, but I must have done something wrong tonite, anyway, this means I will be putting many of my posts into draft and repost at a later date, soon however, because some of them are quite popular. I don't know if I'll have to edit them too.. This is depressing :(

I will do more writing today anyway, to include new material, which I have or haven't worked on previously, but which haven't hit the blog yet.

With regrets, Jane

Sunday, December 8, 2013

If she wore red, she would be LIttle Red

Zaha S says:  

+Jane Dughatir I don't really understand what I'm denying either?

(LOL< this is a common thing on the internet – I DON’T” UNDERSTAND”< I’m NOT an EXPERT< I haven’t’ STUDIED” – then MY ADVICE IS don’t say things off the top of your head, for GOD’S SAKE OKAY to be FAIR< she is talking about my statements to her ABOUT WHAT SHE DID SAY!!! , so we will stick to that for now)

“I don’t understand what I’m denying either?” (This appears to be my fault, lol, she is being contrary, and she means she understands what I’m accusing her of, but doesn’t agree that she said anything wrong.)

“It is true what you said about Saudia and Iran I never denied that, what I'm saying is their governments are not Islamic! No country in the world practices Sharia law perfectly. I also mentioned that crimes like those are punishable but not all by death, because at the end of the day you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives (of course some things like rape and murder are another story). Thank you for calling someone you don't know a weak Muslim and "little" I really appreciate that. I'm not going to spend my time responding to someone who insults me, especially a fellow Muslim. If you are Muslim yourself you would know that Islam preaches kindness. Once again M3asalama”

Well, since we are being forgiving, why are MURDER and RAPE another story?? OH, I KNOW, because also in the west, where she grew up, they are crimes which get punished; her standard is only what AMERICA agrees with. SO, we have to do what AMERICA says; that’s fine if you LIVE IN America, but MOST MUSLIMS DON”T.

But you don’t get to change the sharia, or lie. THAT’S A NO_NO on the internet, BECAUSE< no one will believe you if you LIE>

I don’t lie,(not only, but also) because then I will get caught and no one will believe me, EVER,, especially because I’m a “strict Muslim”; IF I LIE, I’ll have no credibility left!!

Some ppl however, don’t care about their credibility, they figure they are insignificant, and their opinions don’t really amount to anything anyway, (or maybe I am almost the only one who read what they said, so they don’t care – they just want to win an argument, by tip toeing around issues and playing with words), or “I DIN’T SAY That YOU SAID” nonsense is always USEFUL to confuse the discussion; the more confusion, the better to hide what they don’t want you to see, that they LIED and are covering it up, or trying to disguise it as something the other person said wrong.

LIKE MR T< stressing the word “NICE” as if it is a crime to paraphrase someone…YOU will see how ridiculous his ‘accusations’ are. (or even for me to put quotes around the word nice, “NICE” as if he did say “NICE” - and not other things which mean someone is nice. AND what the hell did he think that would prove?? That I didn’t direct quote him??

OKAY I ADMIT IT, LOCK ME UP & throw away the key, forever. I”D PREFER THAT sometimes to this kind of ridiculousness and immaturity.



I said:

Salaam, dear. No, you said the specific crimes that were discussed such as sexual crimes are not punishable and they are ([with death], I’m qualifying this now since I neglected to but I had said it earlier, but as she had said above, “but not all by death” – well, those crimes are punishable by death and she should n’t claim otherwise, does she write the sharia law??Is it her place to make Fatwas, about who gets punished; especially if she isn’t giving any details, just a general rule that “you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives” isn’t good enough and is lying. So is stealing [punished, with cutting the hand, and there are rules, but yes, punishment happens) No, Iran and Saudi don’t practice sharia perfectly, I also agree with that elsewhere and didn’t say she “denied” that, so why is she saying “I never denied that”, as if I had accused her of denying that [“it isn’t practiced perfectly”, I agreed and always agree with that statement, nothing is perfect, this life is imperfect and the Muslims and their practice of the religion will always be imperfect – BUT GOD doesn’t require us to be PERFECT, just to try to follow ISLAM to the best of our ability. (THAT’s why, unlike Christians, we don’t believe we need[ed] “JESUS, A.S, to die for our sins.)

I have to protest the way these two (and many like them on the net) point out to me what they said, as if I had “denied them” or accused them of something which they didn’t say, they have said enough wrong that I don’t have to make up other stuff, too…).

THEN I SAID:

“That's in Islam when a country properly practices sharia, which is why even though Saudi and Iran are not perfect models of Islam, they do have such punishments which have always been done in Saudi, following the way of the early Muslims. People read about Islam and books are easy to find, as well as some proper sites on internet. ..."You can't fool everybody all of the time." And you can't fool me. Yes, ma'a salaam. Islam also preaches knowledge of your religion. Even many non-Muslims know Islam better and defend it better than you do. “

The overall tone of her message is “YOU ACCUSED ME OF SOMETHING I DIDN’T SAY (this is utterly misleading and just a red herring attempt to make herself appear innocent) Brave MR T Also does the same thing. HE KEEPS BRINGING UP THAT “HE NEVER SAID THAT SUFIS ARE NICE PEOPLE?? OH NO?? And that is all MY FAULT because I placed quotes around the word “NICE”. SO, I asked him “YOU DON’T THINK SUFIS ARE NICE THEN?? BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN GUSHING ABOUT HOW good they are, not his exact words, and then said in the next sentence, that “SALAFIS and WAHHABIS”( who are ALWAYS MUSLIMS FROM SAUDI ARABIA) or the gulf – IN OTHER WORDS SUNNIS – are BAD PEOPLE, not his exact words. But you can read his exact words; I will post the conversation in full if I have all of it, or post most of it here, or next post

It would help if First, the reader can decide whether they believe that SUNNIS are really that bad?? How come they are so bad and all others, even the SHIA who are also killing and slaughtering MUSLIMS in Syria right now, by the thousands, including children, DON’T DESERVE ANY CONDEMNATION BY +TVEE, but the “WAHHABIS and SALAFISTS” DO??

I”LL TELL YOU WHY _ BECAUSE that is what he has learned on the INTERNET and in the MEDIA> he is always hearing about the bad SUNNIS (because no one on the internet or the MEDIA claims that these “WAHHABIS AND SALAFISTS” are anything but the MUSLIMS WHO ARE FROM SAUDI< or the gulf, or ARABS and practice “EXTREMISM”. That is the CLAIM< which MR T, like a good “SUFI LOVER” believes, just because it gets repeated so many times day in and day out.

IF the READER today isn’t the slightest bit open minded about this discussion, which will take some time, then THIS POST isn’t for you!! IF YOU ARE VERY GULLIBLE and believe everything negative you hear about SAUDI< which isn’t perfect, but so isn’t AMERICA or EUROPE perfect> then you don’t belong here reading my blog. QUITE frankly, the discussion would be OVER YOUR HEAD. OR IT WOULDN”T PLEASE YOU, at which point you will become frustrated or angry, and then call me “NOT MUSLIM” like the very mature and intelligent Mr. T (with an IQ of 128, wow is that very high? Congratulations, for your high IQ; like I care, or even believe you, lol. It doesn’t take an IQ test to know that you are an ignoramus, though!)

MR T< first off, almost from the beginning says he doesn’t know a lot about ISLAM. So, the first cute or nice –seeming girl on the internet who SAYS ANYTHING about ISLAM is his favorite commentator. HE (+tvee) GUSHES ON ABOUT HER (and the sufis).



New York on Islam

(The Libyan American girl/young person replies to someone else, who posted this discussion before me, he is +terente P)


Zaha S

Nov 28, 2013

"Ummm why are you listening to random supposedly "Islamic" groups? Just like the KKK don't rep Christians, these groups don't rep Muslims. Seriously you want to get a good view of Islam then read the Quran. Of course to us Muslims, Islam is the right religion but only for those willing to accept it. It is not going to be the dominant religion in the US because only around 1% of Americans are Muslim seriously why are you being such an Islamophobe? I'm so sick of people like you listening to propaganda, I bet you've never met a Muslim in your life. Peace and may God Bless You."



terente P

Nov 29, 2013

pls dont tell me that CAIR dont represent muslims, but start to fight against that CAIR and tell them they dont represent muslims/islam! :)) if you do that and will succeed in bringing them to stop their activities, then I'll agree with you!

1% of Americans are muslims, but exactly organizations like CAIR try to change that and spread islam in US (there are more of them)

i dont see anything wrong in being an islamophob. there are christianophobes in our societies too and the athiests refuse any kind of religion. everybody can form his/her view how they want. if somebody thinks islam is somethign bad, they are free to think like that!

propaganda is that stupid try to create a positive image about islam, what you are doing here too

"may God Bless You."

God! but not allah (satan)


(Zaha S, says back)

"Ummm first and foremost Allah is Arabic for God and lol I don't think you fully understand the meaning of "Islamophobe". I don't agree with these terrorist groups and most good pious Muslims don't either but they have power, money, and believe it or not the Western governments backing them up so there is not much we can do except use our voices. The only spread of Islam you're talking about is peaceful just like Mormons or Jehovah's witness' at your door on a Sunday morning except even less. Honestly the only thing I'm really concerned about is people looking at weird groups or countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia as models of Islam and thats the opposite no country on earth is representing Islam correctly unfortunately. So please please please as a fellow human being talk to a Muslim about our way of life, don't gather info from Islamophobe sites or people. Happy Turkey Day :)"

Reply (terente P, back)

+Zaha S

no matter what allah in arabic means! its about what are the properties of that allah and they indicate satan, not god. if that what arabs understand as god its actually satan, then is satan their god! worshipers of satan = muslims

you take the arabic meaning of god but tell further down saudi arabia is a weird country :))

you claim there are only some bad examples, but you cant mention a single islamic country where islam isnt bullshit - islam isnt peaceful, no matter which country we take as example

-honour killings

-minor marriages

-death penalties for homosexuality, sex outside marriage, apostates

-slavery

-oppression of women generally
....
we dont need spreading of islam!



Thursday, November 28, 2013

Flickr Is Worth Browsing More Often

It's been a very long time since I have been to my Flikr account. Well, this morning I finally took the opportunity to see some amazing photos on Flikr. In particular, the first photostream I happened across was by Kijal. My favorites are some taken at the Masjid Al Haram, as well as many pretty photos of flowers. I'm not done browsing yet, but thought to do a quick write up on why I think browsing is a worthwhile activity. Browsing on Flikr is enjoyable and one is bound to come across many photos of interest and artistic value.

Browsing is something we can only do online. To make it a good experience and not something stressful, which it shouldn't be or you are not doing it right, you should have accounts in the best places for browsing which are of course, Flickr, for photos, Pinterest, I suppose (which I don't have) and places for videos, which might mean YouTube, but also might mean other online sharing, such as your email account/s and the useful and popular apps like SkyDrive or the Cloud apps. People complain that browsing videos takes a lot of time, which is true. Watching videos can take a lot more time than one anticipates as well (particularly if the internet connection is very slow). Every cloud has a silver lining, or in this case every action on the internet has it's good and bad. 


Many people prefer not to share their photos on Facebook, Twitter or the other usual places. They allow you to grab a link though (copy/pasted as above) and while you can't display the photo on your own site, you can still share it with others, which is an easy way of "sharing the love". You might be inspired to take more of your own photos, and publicly display those, which will showcase your own particular interests and any special talent you might have in photography. I haven't found many photos of my own which deserve special mention, the few I have shared from several different accounts (emails, Google+, Flickr) are noteworthy; on Flickr, perhaps the most memorable (possibly the ONLY photo I've ever posted there (a milenia ago) is of a pigeon. It was taken out our apartment's balcony and shows a pigeon, probably migratory, roosting on the corragated tin (or aluminum) roof above our parking space (at the time, we lived in East Riffa, in a third floor "flat" (Bahrainis say flat, not apartment). It fills me with nostalgia still, because around the same time it was taken, I started my first blog (My IslamFeed) which ended (and was removed).
For me putting myself out there (especially writing) is kind of like pulling off a bandaid. It has to be done, because I continue to want to write publicly, but also it isn't something I would describe as pleasant. I often feel ill at ease or trepiditious when posting something new; I suppose it comes from the desire to please others, and not disappoint, plus the fear of a public flogging (or readers scorn).


[Revising: I couldn't find the pigeon, maybe I had two accounts and one is now obsolete, rather I forgot about it and created a second account, which is still there. (But that means no more pigeon photo, I will have to dig into my old digital photos to find it, which could take some doing!)]

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

To Be Or Not To Be

Not "He"

I had written recently, because I am not the eye that sees everything, or know the unseen, that I thought someone who commented as "Libyan" was my husband. Later, I think the next day, when he called me, he told me that wasn't him - because he doesn't comment on my blog, actually, but he does get emails whenever I publish something. I should have been forewarned by some "premonition" which women get, that he would bring it up, which he did immediately, "I'm not 'Libyan'". "Oh", I said. And for a moment something "awkward" happens. I feel an invisible process,  like a force field suddenly erected by a gigantic spaceship to capture the Earth or the pull between two planets, or the gravity of a bigger planet drawing in a smaller planet, maybe. I am like a satellite, an object with no resitance and feel the need for some air. Then the feeling is gone - we start to discuss our plans for the coming week.

Stay Tuned

Something exciting is happening, which I won't discuss right now. It is kind of a top secret matter around here, I was told the other night when I had dinner with someone. I am good at keeping secrets, so I am bound by an oath. Or I wouldn't have been trusted with this in the first place. Also, being a blogger, I suppose I should always look at the bigger picture - I will report on this again later.

Last night, I talked to K again trying to smooth over the logistical problems for him to come home in time for the "big day", but it is touch and go right now. I am keeping my legs crossed, lol. That means of course (not what you might think) that I am at my desk today again, typing away. I am not ashamed to admit the detox program I mentioned last week on Twitter has me jumping to the bathroom quite a lot - so in more ways than one, time is of the essence this week. Does he think he can make it, or is he trying not to let me worry about it? I tell him I don't completely believe that things will "magically" or otherwise, work out. It is like booking a ride to the moon, unless you are stinking rich, it ain't happenin'. I have a nervous feeling; butterflies which soon will be a large pit in my stomach, if I don't know we can manage to solve the timing problem.

A Man on a Mission

When I went to Juffair the other night, my husband sent five or six SMS checking up on my progress; did I take my son as well? Don't forget to close the car door? Take one of the girls with you! What???
He was worried; I said I will be fine, why would he worry so? I then wondered if he'd had a bad dream, which made me worry - but I pushed that thought out of my head.



K
 If I know him, already the thought crossed his mind to ask other people to call to find out where I am. If I knew how to use one of the applications to pinpoint my whereabouts on a map, I would, just so he could be sure; In fact I think that’s a good idea for all couples. What’s wrong with being able to find one’s spouse on Google Maps™ or Wat’sApp™? And parents should do the same thing with their kids. But there should be agreement that we are going to share our locations anytime, anyplace, because we care – it’s the same as asking your teenager to “call [you] when [she] get[s] there”.
 

He was in stealth mode - probably his own sense of well being depends on my physical well being. As internet service would have it, I couldn't connect for a few minutes, and had to leave - in the car there was no chance of messaging him again. I was relieved, I have to say, because I was afraid he might tell me to stay home, which I would have to do then. To other people, non-Muslims and also many Muslims, this sounds archaic and ludicrous. But I don't care what anyone thinks.

A Room of One's Own

Being on the same page with my husband is paramount. And, though my life isn't perfect, Islam is one of the constants that makes my life worth living, without which I think I would rather be just another form of creature, like a bug; bugs have no worries, I mean, how big are their brains? I don't think something that small knows much about anything, not even what it looks like. They don't have feelings or problems - certainly not the drama human beings experience almost all the time. It's nothing less than biology (but proof of the irrelevance of theories about human evolution) that we don't all have an instinctive urge to jump like lemmings do, considering some of our's deep seated neroses, volatile relationships, jobs that don't pay enough, or careers that don't make sense - what does a stock broker really do? Our lives are always careening towards some danger, or we are always trying to cope, trying to make sense, or trying to forget. That is one side of the story, then there is the good stuff, which would take another five minutes to think about; and I don't have the time.  

I can't blame K for his overpowering need to know where I am and what I am doing - and occasionally refusing me permission to do something even if I am set on it. I understand it better now, after the events of this past summer; I was the one who "needed to know" - where he was, what he was doing, who he was with, who he was talking to on the phone. So I do understand - needing to know can be very unsettling and is much harder to ignore than needing to pee (this is something I know women understand more than men, so the metaphor is an apt one, lol) But he can also be unpredictable, which makes it harder on me, when I have thought something through, decided on a course of action and then find that he is putting up resistance.

Making things public

I timed the start of my blog well, he didn't have anything to say about it at first. Sometimes he tells me to be careful.  Now, he even gives me advice or comments. He liked the last post, though I felt he wasn't being completely honest about his thoughts. "Too personal?" I asked. But he said on his phone the paragraphs were mixed up - I said, no it IS mixed up, because I couldn't edit it; I might edit the post later (should but probably will not do it today), which will mean deleting it,  editing my copy on the pc, posting a new draft, and republishing; I can edit the labels then as well, if I think its necessary. I can't do anything about making the subtitles stand out, block lettering isn't an option. I am frustrated about this, but haven't found any solution to the problem yet. This one, is being written on the fly. I hope it meets peoples expectations, as per the title.

I don't like getting too personal, this is one of the times where I am hesitant, but also figure, WTH, it's only a blog afterall. Blogs are supposed to be journals. I write to tell people what I believe, and this maybe is just one of those attempts to explain a Muslim's perspective on a personal matter of little significance to others, but which impacts my life perhaps weekly or less than that. I hope other people who have struggles or their own little problems have a way to cope that is as simple as mine - the purpose of a journal is to let one's feelings and ideas flow, emerge, and maybe solutions will show themselves.


Sunday, November 10, 2013

Down the Rabbit Hole

I'm running later than a clean shaven rabbit with a pocket watch. Oh my my my.
I feel like Alice, places to go, people to see and a world to fix.

People are sending me invitations! I am happy and also a little nervous.
Should I or shouldn't I often pops into my head, like a little shoulder angel. Or maybe it's a little shoulder devil I should be worried about?

I sometimes throw caution to the wind; it is one way of coping I guess.
People who do rash things don't run on a schedule, or follow orders. Maybe that's a good thing, too.
I think things sometimes happen for a reason, and not everything has to be done on a set schedule.

That being said, I should begin posting some photos, at the very least, to the event I'm hosting (Why did I do this to myself?) tonite (as I've explained to people who are invited, it starts at 7 pm, which is GMT+3.)
I haven't gotten the hang of hangouts, so I thought I'd begin meeting people online with a simple jaunt like an event where they can see my screenshots and post comments, if they like. 

For me, being invited for Arabic coffee or tea and cookies is fun, so this isn't going to be a walk on the wild side. But I hope you will join me.

"You were always on my mind" 

Saturday, November 9, 2013

You Are Invited!

al Jazeera shares a link (recitation of Sura Yusuf in soosi style)  
I am doing an event today, which readers might not be aware of yet, though I hope it generates some comments (finally) on my blog. I only ask two things for the event to be a success, in any comments type "I was here" or if you prefer, type something nice. You don't even have to read a blogpost or share if you don't want to.
I don't know yet if comments will be visible, but they should work; I have been asked by someone on Youtube why they can't comment, and the answer is I don't know; I'm not positive if he was refering to the blog as well. I have not blocked anyone for a long time, if ever.
I had one comment from 'Libyan', who I suspect is my husband. Other than that, no comments yet.
People like to press the +1, which is nice.
Enjoy the event, or the blog, and don't forget to type "I was here" in the comments section of a random post.
People, don't all comment in the first post you see, that's the third and final rule.
Have a nice day!

A screenshot of a circle I was interested in joining.

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Yusuf Estes

Is Yusuf Estes Muslim?


Post navigation

← Arabic Terms: Yusuf Estes Explains “Shirk”, “Dua”, and “Ibadah”

Arabic Website Launched: The Teachings of Yusuf Estes →

One response on “Join the Awareness Campaign and Help Spread the Correct Understanding of Islam”

1. yusufestesquran October 4, 2012 at 7:58 pm • • Reply →

The Arabic Website http://www.YusufEstesArabic.com has been launched. Please forward the link to Arabic speaking Muslims you know who you would like to learn about the reality of Yusuf Estes’ teachings.

2. Jane Dughatir October 4, 2013 at 9:02 am • • Reply →

Your comment is awaiting moderation.



I read your website several months ago and commented there at one time not realizing what your website and work is all about. You say Yusuf Estes is a liar, and misleading people. But MWFJ is lying. Why mislead people so they spread your website informaiton, [sp] etc.? If you think you are better than Yusuf Estes, why did you start off this campaign against him, by lying to the public about your true intenitons? [sp]

My recent comment as posted on the MWFJ website (above). It probably won’t be there long, because these people delete all comments against them.

I was fooled for almost a year, or since I first read their original website, which misled me to believe they wanted to support and defend Yusuf Estes. Now I know the truth.

I ask anyone not to click on their links (in blue above) but you can click on the link where I was and comment or publish your own comments, and spread the truth about this website on your own blog or website.

I don’t ask you to hate these people, but pray for their guidance (and mine).

I regret having ever provided them even verbal support. Knowing that they are the ones who lied to me about their true intentions makes me angry. However, I can’t do anything about that. But I hope people will take heed when going on “Islamic” websites, as I will do in the future (with more caution).

Only the final paragraph of their original website - which I only got back to and finally read (to the end) today – told me that the real goal of MWFJ is to get more people to hate Yusuf Estes or stop watching and spreading his videos and reading or sharing his materials, or visiting any of his sites.

I consider Yusuf Estes a brother in Islam. Whatever mistakes he or anyone else, has made in the past, don’t justify a hate campaign against him, which ignores the fact that many people have been guided to Islam (the true religion – Sunni Islam) through his or other peoples’ efforts. No one is perfect. (This is my opinion, and I’m sure others, like MWFJ, have theirs).

Now that I know the real reason behind all the “negative comments” which were removed from the MWFJ website’s comments section, I will never go there again, nor comment. But I urge others to spread this information, ONLY IF You Agree with Me.

If you don’t agree with me, that’s fine. But don’t hate me.

There are Muslim youth and others (also in Bahrain, I’ve been told) who hate other Muslims. Instead of sincerely praying for the general Muslims they spend their time cursing and spreading lies or slander about people. These are the ones with weak faith, but I don’t hate them. I wish for their guidance only. There is no benefit in spreading hate, so I ask others to have an open mind only about what is said on the internet and not to judge others based on what they may or may not have said.

We are all responsible for our speech and our actions. No one is responsible for the speech or actions of another. Peace.

- DD

Peace and Blessings unto the Prophet and Messenger of Allah, Muhammad, and unto the righteous companions.