Showing posts with label God. Show all posts
Showing posts with label God. Show all posts

Sunday, February 16, 2014

A "Rare Breed" of Atheist

Don't pinch me, I'm awake.


I know what atheists think, that deists and theists are morons.

But what makes some of them now pride themselves even more (than other atheists)?

The "Vegan Atheist" has spawned a whole new breed of folks who believe they are better equipped to deal with the menace that is modern religion. They outright reject any belief in god, or gods, or the rules which religious people follow as moral. But that's not all...

They pride themselves for their superior intelligence, which might I add, doesn't (really) require one to "wear shades". Though you would think, from the way they pat each other on the back, that mere mortals wouldn't be capable of such brilliance or even witnessing it.


Should I say Dr. Vegan Atheist?


Well, not yet.


This same nonsense which is called "logic" that I've seen somewhere before, proves disappointingly funny however, along the lines of something someone else said when debating some points of religion (Islam) with me, "One person's reality is another person's illusion".
I begged to differ with that.


Oh, by the way, I did leave a comment or two for the Vegan Atheist on his YouTube channel, or on his blog, but I think he has yet to respond. I think I might have embarrassed him.


What I said,

"I'm not sure if you are the same Vegan Atheist who commented on comments in your You Tube videos?
In the "Stupid Muslim Comments" video #6, the "Vegan Atheist" says he thinks "people came from apes.["] What do you think..

I will say this for Richard Dawkins, he scoffs at people who believe that, yes. He is a biologist and therefore we assume somewhat intelligent and educated. He believes the theory of evolution and that "humans and apes share a common ancestor" but not that humans evolved from apes.

I hope vegans and atheists everywhere will think before they speak or write on the internet.
It isn't only others who make stupid comments.

"If you want to dish it, then you can take it", but like I said, I don't know if you are that person.
If you RSVP I wouldn't mind. I have my own blog as well."

(February 14, 2014 at 12:11 PM)

This was one of the posts I wanted to get up for V-day.

********

I did however have the opportunity to share one of the people I love in dawa, who is "Idris Tawfiq" a very loved and intelligent Muslim man, a revert from Britain. ( I had thought he was Irish)
I shared some of his links, etc. yesterday, the 15th of February.

February 14th, I drafted another post which I will share today on the blog.
 
So many more things I've been sharing from all over the place, on Twitter and Facebook, I can't remember them all now, but still I haven't gotten down to the nitty gritty of going through my old folders (boxes, too) of ideas, writings, drafts, paper and flash memory, or the hard work of finishing important final drafts.

I'm feeling restless, so I guess, it is time for something new and exciting.

Wonder what that might be?






Sunday, January 5, 2014

God, Hitchens, and the Harry Potter stories

Reality is Never an Illusion


A person argued on google said, “One person’s reality is another person’s illusion.”
I said that’s nonsense.

Proof –

You should really have proof for whatever you say, unless of course you’re writing fiction. Even in a fiction story, the reader will only swallow one “unbelievable” or “incredible” idea. (This isn’t my idea, but I had read it somewhere, and the credit is due to whoever said it or teaches it. Probably it is something taught in writing school, too.)

In Harry Potter stories it is that magic is real. If you added other incredible things the viewer or reader must also believe, the story’s plot and twists becomes burdensome or disappointing. The setting and characters, though not real, are part of the story, and prove the main idea, so are not a problem; we know such things don’t exist, but in the story they do, so they enhance the idea about magic being real (in the stories at least).

Superman’s only weakness is “kryptonite” (okay, and maybe Lois Lane, but that’s not an incredible leap of the imagination, or something which takes away from the storyline)

Can you think of other examples?

People can fly, with pixie dust, in Peter Pan. Or, a man shrinks his kids with an invention, in “Honey I shrunk the kids”.

You get the idea.

Even in real life, how many lies can someone swallow, before they have to admit that something is not right? For example, couples fight all the time, especially if one of them is being unfaithful. Exposing infidelity is likely the “straw that [breaks] the camel’s back”, in many relationships.

Defrauding the company, or insider trading, will get one fired, at work, or arrested in the real world; also in movies.

I was really happy when the guy (The Informant) played by one of those famous actors (think he was one of the earlier “brat pack” of the 80s) who was insider trading and claimed to have bi-polar syndrome was imprisoned. The judge didn’t believe that having bi-polar syndrome would cause someone to defraud his company, steal and cheat, or work as an informant for the FBI, lying to them as well as his company (and his wife) also ruining the good reputation of an FBI agent.

Reality is reality, illusion is illusion. There is no in between, either.

********

‘The man of her dreams’

A woman might search for the man of her dreams but she doesn’t know if he really exists.

I watched movie, years ago about a man who finds his true love, only to learn that she is a ghost, and in another one, a woman finds her true love, only to learn that she is dead, or something like that.

********

In the novel by Frederick Forsythe, “The Day Of The Jackal”, he wrote on pp. 25-26, “It occurred to [Rodin] as he trudged back to the humble rooming house that some might think he too was chickening out, disappearing from the threat of kidnap or assassination by the Action Service. He shrugged to himself. Let them think what they wished, the time for lengthy explanations was over.

He lunched off the boarding house Stammkarte, the meal of the day…By mid-afternoon he was gone, bags packed, bill paid, departed on a lonely mission to find a man, or more precisely a type of man, whom he did not know existed.”

Rodin wants an assassin, but for his plan to work, the man can’t be just anyone. His mission is so important to him he doesn’t include anyone else or even care what others think. But he believes he will be successful. Whether or not he will find a perfect assassin or ‘the perfect man for the job” is not at all certain, except we know that man is already boarding a plane, on p. 26, in the following paragraph. In books, if you have patience, everything will be revealed. Sometimes, in life that is also possible. At least, many people believe they know everything, or the most important things.

********

When Allah wanted a prophet, He chose from the best type in the era or place He knew that person would be victorious, or who He wanted to single out for this specific favor and honor. Not all the prophets’ missions were highly successful, but they were good men, the right man, and it was only the lack of good people they sought, calling to the true religion, who were hard to find. Some prophets had many followers, Musa, A.S. did, others had few, or even none. Muhammad, pbuh, said he would have the most followers on the Day of Judgment. It appears that prophecy is coming to bear fruit, and God knows best.

I realize it is annoying to many people that religious folks think they know it all. Well, they don’t know everything do they? No. But maybe many of them have a pretty good idea of what reality is? Since this isn’t something any one can prove with an easy litmus test, that’s why belief in God is called “faith”. But it takes real study to be firm in one’s belief or convinced of one religion’s truth over the others.

Many Jehovah’s Witnesses are leaving because they have learned unsettling things about their religions’ teachings or other things. There are channels on YouTube devoted to the Jehovah’s Witnesses or exposing wrongs in the Witnesses’ teachings or community.

Debating God:

In the video debate between Christopher Hitchens, the late, and William Lain Craig, Hitchens doesn’t want to say he’s an atheist, because he knows the burden of proof will be on him, to prove that God doesn’t exist, just as the burden of proof is on William Lain Craig to give “sufficient” evidence that God does exist.

In the subbing for the video I watched, which is on YouTube, and I added to a few of my playlists, like “Debunk This”, Hitchens says that Lain Craig’s proofs must be “magnificent”, but that isn’t true.

By a simple equation we know why, “Atheism = true”, “Theism = false”, and “Theism = true”, “Atheism = false”. Both have to prove their point sufficiently, in order to win.

Hitchens hems and haws, before he finally agrees to the statement “I am an atheist” because if he says he is only an “agnostic” he cannot argue strongly, if at all, for the side “God doesn’t exist”. He must argue against God, so he must say without hesitation (which proves harder for him than one might have thought, considering this is “The Hitch”. Anyway, he can’t do it with any great success and WLC appears to win the debate.

Many atheists thumb down the video, about one third of that thumb up the video, but as one comment points out, “thumbs down don’t prove that God doesn’t exist”, any more than Hitchens did.

Atheists and also agnostics, argue against God with logical fallacies, like “I can’t see or touch God” so He doesn’t exist, or “since cultures all over the world believe in God and their stories don’t make sense, or their beliefs don’t make sense, so God isn’t real”.

If I die tomorrow, and in one hundred years there is no record of my having been born or died, and no one remembers me or even heard of me, and no internet search even will show that I was ever here, does that mean I never existed? No.

The video gives a much better explanation of what happens in the debate, and I highly recommend others to watch it who are interested in “the God debate”.

Peace





Friday, January 3, 2014

The Ever-Watching God - Said Rageah



Watching now... the title is interesting and related to what I blogged about earlier.
If I get any ideas for a post, I will update this writing, God willing.

The Longest Post Ever - 3 Parts

Why I Believe in God – Part One


I’m adding or expanding a few points from my last post, a response to an article CNN chose as one of the top for 2013, by an atheist mother, called, “Why I Am Raising My Child without God”.

My God is not an “Angry God”.

Allah, is my God, He is the Creator and Sustainer. He is the Lord of the Universe, my “Rabb” and the lord of all.

What people get angry about - parking tickets and tsunamis God doesn’t get angry about. God isn’t like people.

People get angry about Islamic law (sharia) and the freedom of speech or freedom of religion of Muslims in non-Muslim countries. Muslims get angry about America’s dominance and policing of the world, or the patriot act; so do many non-Muslims.

God mentions things he has forbidden, in the Quran, it is the final revelation; Jews and Christians may drink alcohol, but in Islam it is forbidden; we say it is the “mother of all evils”, as the Prophet Muhammad, pbuh, taught.

Allah forbids usury, or interest. Many Jews and Christians see nothing wrong with it; in Islam it is considered such a grave sin that it is equated with incest; a man sleeping with his mother 36 times, in Ahadith (the prophetic narrations). Allah hates interest and punishes those who deal in interest (Riba in Arabic).

If you get angry, does that mean people call you an “angry person”? No.

Then why do people call God an “angry” god? They think they have the right to judge God, even a god they don’t believe in.
In the bible or Old Testament, God is described as such  "Your God is an angry god", so maybe that's one reason this is said a lot. (sorry if that's not the exact quote).
********

Atheists argue against all religion based on some of their misconceptions about God, which largely are inherited or passed down to them through their passive knowledge (or knowledge they gained sometime in their lives when they used to believe, before they rejected God; maybe they were Christians, or Jews, or other ). Armed with this knowledge, passive or past experience, they believe they are well equipped to argue against all religion, and against the existence of a Supreme Universal God or Supreme Being.



God is not like people, “there is nothing like unto Him”.

God is the Judge, therefore who can judge Him?

The believers probably will unanimously agree that we don’t tell God what to do, but that He has every right (and it is His dominion alone) to tell us what to do, how to live, and what we should believe. The fact that there are numerous religions doesn’t bother most believers. They all believe they are on the right path.

Muslims, believe that Islam is the correct religion, largely because they have the “final revelation” which they believe has no errors, is divinely revealed word, is the Word of God Almighty, without error, and is basically a continuation of what was revealed before it; the reason for the new revelation was to right the wrongs of the other religions, namely Jewish and Christian faiths which had deviated from the correct teachings, and whose people deviated from the correct path as a result of their books being corrupted.

For example Islam teaches that the Jews changed their books, “what your own hands have wrought” and Christians worship Jesus, for the same reason, having adopted the attitude/belief about Christ as the savior. Their original teachings were corrupted by the central idea/belief that Jesus, A.S., is the savior of mankind.

Blood sacrifice, or the death/crucifixion and resurrection of Jesus, A.S., as well as the errors contained in the Bible, point to the fact that the Bible was corrupted sometime after Jesus parted with his people. There are errors in the accounts as well as many nonsensical or even mathematical and scientific errors in the Bible.

Atheists believe that believers in God accept that God is vengeful or unmerciful; or they think we turn a blind eye to these “faults”.

But God doesn’t have any faults. Therefore we, as imperfect beings are not ones to judge God. I mentioned some of the peoples’ complaints against God, that He permits tsunamis, natural disasters and the like, or that He punishes for sins; Allah does as He wills. It isn’t proper for the creation to complain to the Creator about “faults” they suppose He has. That being the case, there is Wisdom behind everything that Allah does or His rule.

********

Human beings are such that they “appreciate” and show “gratitude”, these qualities which we have, are a part of our slavery to Allah. The fact that we show gratitude, thanks, appreciation and so on really impresses upon us, that we are in some ways needy, feeble, and we are therefore greatly lacking in some things, to varying degrees; even our wealth which some people have more than others, is ours from Allah. We are therefore thankful to Him even more than we are thankful to any others. It is an unislamic character that doesn’t show gratitude for blessings or favors, whether that is a blessing from Allah or a favor someone has been able to do for someone/people.

Allah is the Lord of the Universe, therefore His status is more than that of any worldly King or ruler, and He is “the King of Kings”, according to Islamic teachings. Allah’s designation, which He informs us about, and all his personal names and attributes are His and His alone, though human beings can possess similar attributes, theirs are not perfect like that of Allah’s.

When we get angry, sometimes our anger is not wholly just but is the result of other emotions too, such as jealousy. Being angry for the sake of Allah therefore is more important and just than anger for mere personal interests, such as one’s “self-dignity” or a mere “image”. The Prophet, pbuh, therefore, didn’t get angry for himself, nor retaliate for himself, and due to this quality he even forgave the Meccans who had persecuted himself, in particular, such as Hind, Abu Sufyan and other notables of the grandest tribes, who were debased by the Muslims stunning turnaround in the war arena and eventually on the day of the conquest on their victory at Mecca, in a bloodless assault on the Holy city. Most of the people embraced Islam willingly after having seen the evident signs, on that day.

The people show gratitude to each other, but to God we should be most grateful. He is the one who gives us life, permits us to live in peace (or if necessary, permits us to fight for our own defense), gives us blessings in abundance, and we can’t deny them; even the oxygen we breathe is one of His blessings. Then how can we be so stingy in our thanks to the Lord who provides us form the time we take our first breath?

Yes, the reason is that instead of being grateful the people are angry. Their anger isn’t for themselves only, but for what they see as divine injustice. But being that they don’t claim to believe in any “God”, they say that “God” doesn’t exist. They want to ignore God, because they judge Him to be ‘cruel’ or ‘unmerciful’, or the idea of a God as preposterous, because a God who is supposed to be “perfect” or “merciful” and “loving” wouldn’t permit disasters or atrocities.

The atheists no doubt believe that the “natural disasters” (which often others claim are retribution for sins) are proof that God doesn’t exist, or that the God Christians and Muslims, and others believe in must not love us. (It is difficult to argue what atheists believe because they have no belief, except the lack of belief; they believe in “nothing” except this life.)

Is it logical to believe in nothing? Or is it more “comforting”? No, to both, I think.

It is no more “logical” to believe in the idea that the universe came out of nothing, than it is to believe that there is a Creator who made everything from nothing.

Why atheists have a stubborn attitude to this is obvious; they lack faith, purely and simply. But to call belief “illogical” is not acceptable to believers. It isn’t universally or widely held that there is no God. In fact, it is only recently that more and more people claim to believe in no God.

The fact that something is becoming more prevalent also doesn’t prove it is true.
-

While the Muslims point to the Quran as “a book without error”, there is nothing the atheists can point to as fact, which proves that God doesn’t exist; I recently blogged or shared some videos (in 1-3 parts) which have an explanation about Darwinism or discussion which shows that Darwinism, natural selection are not proven by science, nor does it seem possible for the necessary “biological algorithms” to ever materialize which would prove natural selection is even remotely real or possible.

A creation points to a Creator, it would seem, is more than logical, and more believable than that an algorithm for Darwin’s theory of natural selection will happen, since it has not to date been seen to occur. Mathematical algorithms have proven gravity, but no biological algorithm has proven natural selection, according to French and other experts, as discussed in the video (part one).

It is fair to say, moreover, that the insistence by many of the truth of natural selection is therefore as illogical (or unlikely) as the belief in (or existence of) many gods.

Muslims often say that the Quran is a miracle, contains scientific facts, or is not contradictory to science, at least. But what atheists point to in natural selection isn’t at all conclusive. So, they are not at all correct in their stand; they have no right to abuse believers, who believe in a Creator, while there is a creation, yet they believe in a theory which has no proof, though other theories have been proven long ago, much more easily, by other kinds of algorithms or by (other) scientific means.

A God who is Perfect or All Knowing or Capable can perform miracles, or prophets can perform miracles by such a God’s leave, but science cannot make a perfect model for natural selection. Then how can the disbelievers claim that an entire universe can arise from nothing?

********

Degrees of Disbelief:

Disbelievers argue that there is no God. Others are not true atheists, but are fence sitters, who are agnostic, meaning they are not sure that a God exists. Or so I have come to think of agnostics (in that way).

Anyway, it is such people not sure what they believe about the existence of a Supreme Being who ask, “If God exists, why does He permit suffering”.

I said, last time, that “suffering” is nothing “illogical”, that it is in fact quite commonplace, and therefore it is part of our human condition. Animals, as well suffer in this earthy existence.

Unlike animals, people are responsible for their sins, and for belief in God. Animals also believe in God, and they worship Him, although we cannot perceive this, some ppl point to how camels kneel, or praying mantis "pray", etc. But in Islam, we know this because of the teachings of the Holy Prophet, pbuh. A similitude to how animals believe, and praise God or worship, is like the animals who rely on their Lord for sustenance, and they always find it, unless it is their time to die, in which case they may die from hunger or thirst, but mostly animals also die from other causes. In any case, when their time is up, their time is up; they cannot delay death, just as humans cannot delay death. These are matters which are decided by God, even before we are born. Since such creatures owe their existence and sustenance to the Creator, it follows that they also worship the Creator. In this they have a common “slave” status like humans. But they generally do not deviate from the nature which Allah created them with. On the other hand, humans often do.

There is a tradition which tells that on the Day of Judgment the animals will also be judged; they will take their rights from the other animals, so that the horned sheep will be punished by the not horned sheep for what it did to the other, and the not clawed or not fanged animals, will retaliate against the injustice they suffered. But then the animals will die, and they will not enter either Paradise or Hell. (Revise)

People will however receive a divine, lasting reward or punishment, or a punishment of some severity or length, after which they will be permitted into Paradise, if they are believers.

Part Two – Suffering is Inevitable

That suffering happens, is one problem people have with religions. Does this mean God doesn’t love the believers? Maybe God doesn’t love the non-believers, is true, but why also make believers who claim that God loves them, or children who are innocent, suffer? Does Allah permit suffering because He doesn’t care about us?

This is a question which bothers many people, even believers. But Allah’s names and attributes tell us about Allah. If we don’t know these names or attributes, we will forever be confused about Allah. Therefore we should learn about these, and to learn the names of Allah is very beneficial and rewardable.

Allah permits people to live and die, moreover, He answers prayers.

We see that Allah is Merciful, Al Rahman, Al Raheem, two qualities of mercy, which are His and no one else is equally capable of; He is merciful to creatures in this life, and also, to the believers especially, on the Day of Judgment. 99 per cent of His mercy is for the believers on the Day of Judgment.

The smallest and greatest things are under His control; His is the only (real or undeniable) authority. He is All Powerful.

Keeping this in mind, how can we judge Allah, knowing that He knows everything; He is the knower of the “unseen”, the future, for example, as well as every hidden thing, no matter how small.

A story (a man called Al Khudr, who teaches Moses what Allah has revealed to him of wisdom, and the unseen) demonstrates that because of this All Knowing nature specific to the Lord of the Universe, He is the only one capable of judging mankind. He is the only one aware of all, no matter how miniscule or imperceptible, our sins, the great and small ones, our dreams and aspirations or our wishes, whether good or evil, our inclinations, our thoughts, and our hearts. Therefore, who is better to judge us than Allah?

Also, Allah tells us, “I am nearer to my slave than his jugular vein”.


********

 
God Is Logical and Just: Some Questions for Further Study:

- God has special knowledge we don’t. He doesn’t have to be present with us, to know our sins, but angels are appointed for us. Why??

- Intimate knowledge is a wrong expression; yes or no? God doesn’t see or watch us committing evil such as fornication, or when we go to the bathroom, but everything which will occur is written, as Allah ordered the “pen” to “write”. When he said to Jesus, “be”, Jesus came into existence, the angel blew into the sleeve of the honorable and chaste slave girl of Allah, Maryam, A.S., and she conceived Jesus, A.S. Allah decrees, and the angels do as they are told.

God is Merciful – But:

God is merciful to His creatures, but on Day of Judgment He rewards the Muslims/believers for their good deeds and/or forgives the sins they accumulated. This is the meaning of Al Rahman (and) Al Raheem.

Non-believers or weak faithful wonder why Allah permits suffering, or inflicts natural disasters on sinful people, while innocent children or other people suffer due to their relationship to such people, or because they live in communities where natural disasters often occur, such as earthquakes in China, or Tsunamis in Philippines or Bangladesh. Why do the beloved also suffer as much as the ones God doesn’t love, such as the sinful or heedless of God?

We can understand this better if we look at this question from the perspective of God, of a Creator who is Just and who knows everything.

“Allah knows when a leaf falls”. Allah has perfect knowledge; therefore, His Knowing prevents Him from injustice to his creatures. Also, His mercy prevents his injustice to His creatures.

“They earned what their hands have wrought”

Muslims also commit sins, and yet they are sometimes forgiven, and sometimes they must receive a punishment, and then they will enter Paradise. Some people are punished in this life only, others receive a punishment in the grave, and others go to Hellfire for a time, while the non-believers will remain in Hell for eternity.

“Allah’s command is just”.

Muslims also may wish to be forgiven, but if they rely on Allah’s mercy without repenting or changing their ways, then they cannot depend on His forgiveness as a foregone conclusion, but just the opposite is likely to occur, and they may end up in Hell.

********

Allah does not break His promise, therefore all Muslims/believers will enter Paradise, because they have said (and believed) La ilaha il Allah “There is no god (worthy of worship) but Allah” and if they have heard the message of the final Messenger, say, “(and) Muhammadur rasool allah” (Muhammad is the Messenger of allah).

That Allah doesn’t go back on His promise is also a mercy and just. It would be injustice if He didn’t, but Allah is above such a thing.

But Allah told Adam and Eve that when they go down to the earth, they would be enemies with the devil (Iblees) “get ye down altogether…”

He forewarned them that they should be wary of the devil, and to follow the guidance which He promised to send. Therefore, throughout the ages, prophets and Messengers have been sent to the people, so that they would have guidance. If they reject this guidance, Allah tells them they will be punished, “A just reward”.

From the believers’ point of view, this makes sense. Good is rewarded, and evil is punished; God has not left us without guidance, therefore when we follow His guidance we are right and when we don’t follow His guidance we are wrong. It is very few people who can innately do good and avoid evil, without having guidance. Inevitably people without guidance make mistakes or commit sins.

If Allah didn’t punish the guilty while he rewarded the good (only), then that would not be just either. If Allah didn’t forewarn His slaves (people or jinns) then, they would have reason to complain, or say that He didn’t give them the guidance with which to oppose evil, for example. If he didn’t send a book or a prophet to a nation, they would have a right to complain that they were not sent any guidance with which to learn the difference between good and evil, which isn’t something easily discerned in many cases.

We see how interest is destructive to the economy, yet non-believers continue to deal in usury. They are blind to the fact that it is an evil and is destructive. They insist on economies and financial systems built on interest, despite the fact their economies suffer for it. They seem to be blind to the evils of dealing in interest altogether, which is why they rarely are able to see the benefits of Islamic finance, or they refuse to leave it, even though they might also see the benefits of Islamic finance. In the same way, people are often misled by the devil or prefer evil deeds to good deeds. Many people prefer dating, to early marriage, or a life in the priesthood or as a nun, to marriage and children. They perceive that these things are what they want and must be good, because they like and see nothing wrong with them, but really these are practices which are deviations from the true nature of human beings. Inevitably we see problems in societies which permit a great deal of mixing between the sexes, or certain practices which insist on total abstinence and/or isolation from society, whether the majority of the members of those societies believe these are good or not.

How many problems do societies live with just because they have not followed the previous guidance, or they forgot their duty to Allah? We see that the more Muslims forget their religion and stumble through life, the more they suffer just as the non-believers, and in the same ways. The Quran tells, “You (Muslims) will follow the path of those who went before you”. Allah doesn’t say that all the Muslims will follow the ways of non-Muslims, but that groups or some generations of Muslims in some places will follow the ways of the non-believers.


Because Belief IS Logical:

Muslims believe that belief in God is logical, so to argue that it isn’t is not something they are open to. They believe that atheists’ arguments against God and in favor of evolution and other unproven “theories” are illogical. These two groups rarely can agree on anything, I think.

Even among non-believers, there are varying opinions about what is just or what is right. Their disputes with each other about right and wrong are also hotly debated everywhere (but less so than creationism or evolution) among non-believers about what is “moral” or what is “just”. They can only debate these questions of morality, but cannot impose their own opinions on other non-believers, no more than they can impose their objection to the existence of a Creator on Muslims. Some non-Muslims are adamant that homosexuality is a sin, but it is difficult to convince an atheist who has no fear of god, that such a lifestyle is “immoral”. They believe in the individual’s right to do as they wish, as long as they do not hurt others. This is why premarital sex is also not anything wrong in their view. If their views are not the majority view, they will naturally become very antagonistic; we can see evidence on Islamic sites or posts on the internet of this, and trolling, etc.

But Belief is Logical; many people insist that we don’t have to see God to believe in God, nor do we have to understand God. Most believers follow the teachings of their spiritual leaders, or an institution, such as the Orthodox Church, or the Orthodox traditions in their own country, or which they follow. Still, other believers follow their conscience as much as they follow any of the scriptures which they claim to believe. They are not as fundamentalist as others of their fellow believers or many who are fervent believers in a specific church, or a certain sect, for example.

To many a believer, it is often more important that they are sincere to their beliefs and values, than to any notion that all people must follow the right guidance, or a specific path to salvation.

Many claim to follow the right guidance, but all of them cannot possibly be doing that; there is only one religion acceptable to Allah/God, isn’t there?

Anyone who believes that there is only one God worthy of worship and is a true monotheist, should also realize that God sent the world a message - He sent a final Messenger with this guidance to teach the people, that is Muhammad ibn Abdullah, the seal of all the Prophets. His specific message and life has reached to all the corners of the world today.

Part Three:

Do we have the right to claims superior knowledge or wisdom to a God who has sent us Messengers throughout the ages and revealed Himself to us in His books? What is the proof that this God doesn’t exist?

It is a well-known thing that the atheists say that just because in every previous generation and throughout history people have believed in a Supreme Being or a Creator that doesn’t prove that God really exists; the genetic fallacy, e.g. people all over the world believe in god, therefore, that means they have all heard the same stories about a “God” who created the Universe and everything in it, therefore this belief is a well spread “myth”.

But philosophers can argue that just because something exists all over doesn’t mean it isn’t true. Where is the proof that belief (in god or a creator) is based on falsehood? That’s the meaning of a “genetic fallacy”.

Almost similar to this is the atheistic belief that since God should be merciful (or people believe He is, if He is a true God) then He would not punish us for our sins; but the fact is God does punish sins, and sometimes we don’t like this. That doesn’t mean we can argue with God - we cannot, and we are just His ‘slaves’. Being slaves, we have no say in what is just or unjust, and we can’t even know many times, what is just or what is unjust. This is already explained in the previous post.

Then, it isn’t logical to say that because God is just he isn’t merciful or because He is merciful He isn’t just. God is both. If he didn’t punish evil, or allow the destruction of sinful people, even though among them are some good people, then the world would become more and more corrupt; people and nations don’t seem altogether capable of justice or goodness do they? Therefore, they must be checked, and one way of checking them is through trials or disasters. Even the “rotten apples” will make the bunch rotten, or isn’t that the case?

The fact that innocent people live among evil people, doesn’t mean that God is not merciful for also taking their lives, or that He is the cause of their suffering. If they lived among good people, maybe they would not suffer so much. In any case, God is not unjust.

Allah says to the believers, “the earth is spacious”, and so we are encouraged to migrate to places where we are free to practice our religion. It is highly desirable to live among other believers and those of similar faith or sect. Most people of all faiths are naturally attracted to those people they share a common belief with.

********

To say that God is unjust or unmerciful, while we see how merciful and just He is in reality, means we are deliberately denying God’s many blessings and closing our eyes to the truth in front of us. The atheists will no doubt think this is a useless argument, but to others who are confused about this question (why God permits suffering), this might help them understand.

People complain against “a god” who is “invisible”, “not here” who would punish “innocent” people and allow suffering to occur, yet demand us to worship Him, and who is described by the believers as “a merciful god”. They are really complaining against God, but they think they are complaining against a fictional being, idea or a “myth”. The fact that there are disbelievers doesn’t prove the non-existence of God however.

Nor does the dislike of pain prove the non-existence of god, nor does the abundance of blessings support the non-existence of god, nor does the spread of wealth or the rise in crime prove the non-existence of God. God exists; therefore nothing disproves the existence of God.

If suffering proves anything it is that this life is not a dream, that we do exist and are not just people in someone else’s dream. What is more logical? Yet, non-believers in the past used to even discuss the possibility, or philosophize about whether “the creation” actually exists at all in reality (in time and space as we know it to be today through advances in scientific discover).

Because there are algorithms which can prove that gravity is real, or is not just a theory (therefore it must be true) and truth equals reality, therefore, it is even more important to discover and state once and for all whether biological algorithms prove Darwin’s theory of “natural selection”. If they don’t, then people should stop claiming that natural selection is a proven theory, it isn’t; in fact, it is more than likely not ever going to be proven, no matter what other advances we see in science, or the existence of more advanced computers and computer programs. The same can be said for “evolution” then.

I suffer therefore I am:

Suffering is part of life; who is in a position to say, really, that fear and pain are not (equally legitimate) a part of life as much as happiness? Just because we don’t like something doesn’t mean it isn’t good for us. Also, just because we like something doesn’t mean it is good for us. “God knows and you do not know”.

Even it must be a genetic fallacy to assume that because people claim things about God or many believers say things about God that that proves the “angry” nature of god, “jealousy” of god, or any other similar accusations against god we hear. Just because people cannot explain God, or are not able to explain in words what “faith” is or even the correct teachings of their own religion, doesn’t prove that God doesn’t exist. Some of this proves that people often don’t know their own religion’s teachings, or want to deny them, but it doesn’t prove that there is no God.

Pending:

Names and Attributes of Allah, by Sheikh Ibn Al-Qayyim, “Madarij al Saalikeen”.

Conclusion:

A good number of non-Muslims, and atheists, etc., all say wrong or disparaging things about Islam, its prophet, and God. But they are not fair in doing so; in fact they are quite unjust and wrong in their assumptions and beliefs about Islam. They are uneducated about Islam yet speak freely about their misconceptions, and spread lies, furthermore.



Tuesday, December 31, 2013

Why I Raise My Children Without Christmas

This is my response to the article chosen by CNN for the best list in 2013, "Why I Raise My Children Without God".

1. God is not a “bad parent”. He is omniscient, all powerful; He is the Lord of the Worlds.

It is common for western people, and maybe others too around the globe, to compare God to people. But God isn’t a person, nor is He anything like us.

God gave us books, and sent messengers who would teach us right from wrong.

2. God doesn’t tell us to lie. It was the mother who wanted to lie, as she points out. She was the one who was weak and needed to learn that her son can understand and learn; it was her duty to learn how to be strong enough not to lie about her own beliefs. All parents make the mistake in thinking that their children can’t handle things, whether the news about Santa Claus or the fact that millions of children live in poverty or are starving in some parts of the world. Life is tough.

But teaching that she doesn’t believe in God, is her right as her son is hers. Others of course will disagree, but that is basically the law. But it isn’t natural not to believe in God, just the opposite. That being said, I don’t expect that most people will hide their true feelings or beliefs from their young children forever. Eventually, like the mother of the article, they find others also who can share a similar experience. It isn’t any more difficult for atheists to tell what they believe than it is for others. I think this is a woman who was able to manipulate opinion and get a mediocre article published and even rewarded. (CNN didn’t do a good job choosing this article, in my opinion. Many readers said as much, maybe differently than I would)

Racists or Islamophobes also teach their “world view” to their children, but that doesn’t mean that they are right. It just means that they are free to do so.

3. God doesn’t tell us to ignore reality. The woman writes, “How many times have you heard, ‘How did God allow this to happen?’ and the answer is “’It’s not for us to understand’”,  she writes. But the truth is - that is the reaction of many confused believers, agnostics, Christians, or others; not all of the people on earth, though maybe a good deal many.  
Muslims don’t think this way, and maybe Hindus or Buddhists also have a unique perspective. Whatever one believes, blaming God is popular, because that is the idea that has spread, and largely through the fault of Christianity. Christianity teaches that God sacrificed his son, so that we could have eternal life (if we are Christians). Not all religions give us this easy “cop out” or easy way out of our religious responsibilities. Muslims believe that they can also go to “hell” if they don’t believe and act properly according to their religion’s teachings. Or for things like missing prayers, watching improper movies or television, fighting with siblings, and all the things one can think of are considered "bad".

I believe all religions do teach responsibility in day to day activities, however. It is wrong to assume that Christians are not responsible parents or citizens, just because they believe in a savior. It is important to note the difference between their idea of a forgiving God (and a "saviour") and their idea of brotherhood with the commonly "good" outward expressions of their faith (like charity, modesty) which are in themselves justly called admirable.

God doesn’t tell us to be lazy or let bad things happen. When we are able to, we have to take responsibility for our welfare, our children’s’ and neighbors welfare, help our relatives, friends, neighbors, and help out in the community if we can. That is what most religion really focuses on. So it isn’t fair to blame God or religion when people and communities do not take care of their own, or when disasters happen. Sometimes, these are preventable, or we must be ready for any situation, such as natural disasters, on a national scale, and nothing prevents us from doing “good” except our own laziness, or selfishness.

This is a world where God created us to work, not to relax or take it easy; it is His will that we try our best as in a race, to fulfill our duty as the vice-regents on this earth, so that we can earn His pleasure in the next life. In doing good, we are earning points for later, while advancing our good in this life and helping others to advance their goals, too. Life is a struggle, and not a picnic.

Your destiny and your future:

People who believe God should make our lives easy and simple do not understand life and the possibilities. Yes, bad things happen, too. But God doesn’t tell people to hurt other people. People do bad things because they are evil, or they don’t care about others, and so on.

Thus, God doesn’t require or ask us to “abdicate” our responsibilities. No religion should teach such an idea, unfortunately, that is in a way what Christianity and the idea of a “savior” have given the world. No wonder people are confused. It is however very simple minded to blame God for this. It is the people who wrote the book or corrupted the message who are mostly to blame for this situation and despise of God and religion. To be fair, the idea of a savior isn’t the only teaching in Christianity, there are many beneficial and good teachings nothing to do with the central ideology of Christ and the resurrection or (the other) more otherworldly teachings.

4. God isn’t here, no. God is not in this world, or in the universe, but is “above the throne”.

The fact that Allah exists, and does as He wills is enough of a “logical answer”.

What is illogical about suffering? Isn’t it true, if you clumsily allow your hand to touch the hotplate or a fire, that you will burn it and feel the pain? Isn’t it logical, that if you let your child play with toys, he might fall down, or hurt himself, somehow? Isn’t it logical that pollution we cause by burning fossil fuels, or driving our cars, because it is faster than walking to work, is our fault, and not God’s fault. But do we take responsibility for many of our actions? Do we stop flying because it is disastrous for the environment, or do we fly because we want to see our family on holidays, and it is quicker than driving halfway across the country, or travelling by horse and buggy halfway around the world? What is logical isn’t always what the best thing is it?

5. Psychologists teach that if a child is rewarded after he has done good, without any promise of getting rewarded, then the reward is good for him, he realizes that he has done good and gotten a reward. But after a while don’t you think children know that they will get a reward at least sometimes or a nice trip as a “surprise” even though they didn’t ask for or “expect” it. Sure, kids learn fast. But bribing children is wrong, so we don’t give them the reward before they do the thing - that earns the reward - of their own volition. Sometimes parents make mistakes, and they are tired, so they give in to bribery, though they know it’s wrong.

Religions also teach that good has its own reward. It isn’t as if waiting for a lifetime to go to heaven is going to be an immediately gratifying and therefore overwhelmingly attractive offer to young children. We teach them, as religious parents, that God rewards for good, but having to wait a long time will become boring and of course children would then lose interest in doing good – the same could happen to adults, too. This is why all parents, - whether religious or not - teach their children that doing “good” is what is the right thing regardless of what they receive or what it costs them personally. Sometimes doing “good” is costly. Don’t religious people give charity, or alms? Isn’t that money they part with willingly? People teach their kids that there are more important things than money, or owning things, and that sharing, giving, helping out and so on, are all good things, and make us feel good.

The immediate reward is most always something positive, makes us feel happy, and isn’t something tangible. So it is a fallacy to say that God doesn’t teach “good”. Also, religions are basically good, though some of their teachings have been corrupted. Christianity is one in point.

6. As a religious person, I have never once told my children “God has a plan for you”. This woman assumes that all religious people believe and say the same basic things. I think most religious people are well meaning, just as the woman says she is well meaning in not telling her child God exists, because she doesn’t want to lie to him. But it is wrong to assume so many things about all religious people and that all religions teach the same basic things.

We are responsible for our own destinies, to do our best and to expect the best. Yes, God might well have a “plan” as she puts it, but we don’t know what that is, so we are the ones who must decide our destiny and plan our futures. We are our own masters in that sense. That doesn’t seem like narcissism does it?

We strive and then “hope” for the best. Sure, the outcome isn’t always what we would have liked, or the best outcome, but that doesn’t mean God doesn’t know what will happen. He is the all seeing All hearing. That being the case, He answers our prayers “sometimes” in this life, and other times, He promises us better than what we asked for, such as the tremendous rewards for our patience, in the Hereafter, if our lives were not so great, or didn’t work out exactly the way we wanted, so it is the case for most others people. Only a few people never experience great loss or pain in their lives before they leave this earth, and fewer still never lose loved ones in a real “tragedy”. Most people have their share of good and bad times, ups and downs, health and sickness, etc. Most people, until this millennium, have outlived their parents but not their children. At least in the western world. It is interesting then, that it is mostly western atheist people who complain the most about “God not being fair”. Well, they have not seen most of the suffering, which even their own governments have caused, so they should not even dare to mention the “suffering” or what is “fair”, without first taking stock of what they have done to either prevent or reprimand their own government, or challenge the status quo. It is a fact most of the wealth is in the hands of a few, and that no one is forcing atheists either, to see that others be able to share that wealth, or at least refuse industries to pollute in their backyards, while America and others are outsourcing work to poorer countries, etc. Most problems are not something even true atheists can use to point at  and say is any “god’s” fault. It is even hypocritical for them to blame religious people's "god" or "gods" for troubles from murder or genocide, to earthquakes and tsunamis, when these are out of all of our control, and if religious people could prevent these, they would like to just as much as the atheist. It is true, that some things, religious people also blame on atheists or "sinners" anyway. AIDs, or other diseases, or catastrophes.

If being logical is what matters, it is logical that a "god" who is seen by many believers as a "parent" or "angry" might indeed want to destroy much of humanity for its sins. The fact that the same "god" is also "loving" seems contradictory to the atheists or non-believers. But believers often do not have the same problem with this perception. They believe, as Muslims do, that God does what He wills and His decisions are just.

Whether believer or non-believer, each person will have to deal with life and happiness and sorrow often happen to each of us regardless of our outlook or beliefs. Even negative people often experience happiness, and positive people often experience sadness or tragedy. That is the human condition. We are created human, not supermen, nor angels. To expect perfection is stupid, to reach for it is human. We know we can’t be perfect people, and our children can’t be perfect, nor can life be perfect. But, most of us can live with the fact that life is what it is and we are here whether we like it or not. It is better to learn to rely on ourselves, and also trust that friends relatives and our closest loved ones will be there for us, if not, then we already have learned that we must largely rely on ourselves to help ourselves. We have learned that life is really a struggle, and not a picnic.

The meaning of Hope:

Religion does teach us to trust and rely on others. By learning trust, we also learn hope. Hope isn’t just an idea or an intangible, but is something we come to see as real and something we can expect will lead to tangible outcomes.

You have a dream, or a hope, you strive, and then you see, sometimes in the near or a more distant future, the result of hope and trust and striving. That isn’t “believing in ‘nothing’”. That is belief in a - real and immediate sense - in good and in the goodness of the world. The world isn’t all evil or perfect evil doesn’t exist.

Religious people do live in the “here and now”:

Heaven is not meant to be an idea that gives us hope or meaning. It is meant as a reward; likewise Hell is meant as a punishment. The real test is here and now, and the here and now is always the focus of Islam’s teachings. I cannot speak much for other religions. But I don’t think Christianity puts the same emphasis on the here and now as does Islam. I never felt that way as a young person, growing up Christian.

The fact that we can’t see or touch something doesn’t mean it isn’t there. The proof will be in the pudding, but not here and now. It isn’t however something which everyone wants; it is each person’s choice to believe or not to believe. Religions are not forced on people anymore at the point of a sword (and not in Islam), but maybe governments sometimes force schools (or public schools) to teach religions which don’t belong in secular society, or in public institutions. As for Islamic society, what is permitted is also the choice of the rulers or people, their own choice - often a cultural or religious history exists which lends itself to a more accepting attitude toward religion in general. Many Christians and Muslims live in the Middle East or Africa side by side, and do not have problems with religion in schools.

It is each society which must decide how to proceed with this subject, whether allowing separate classes for students of parents who permit religion class or not. Also, the same can be said about some other subjects, or courses, such as sex education or even anthropology. The mother is wrong to think she is alone, when we know that this isn’t a new problem and this is an ongoing debate for the new millennium, which is decades old already.
********
The excellent question is who decides which articles make it to the top for the year? Because this article is the same old same old, except from the perspective of a poor mom, who has pulled the heartstrings of many people, and pulled the wool over their eyes in doing so. Many better articles than this in the list, this one however, is not one of my favorites, nor would I have chosen it. “I think this is a woman who was able to manipulate opinion and get a mediocre article published and even rewarded. CNN didn’t do a good job choosing this article, in my opinion.”

But that’s just me.



Thursday, October 17, 2013

God, Houdini & JFK

Q/A

Someone asks, “If Allah disappears would we know?”

I wish the person would have worded the question differently, but then I think maybe he is a kid.

Did Houdini disappear or make a woman disappear? Many people believed Houdini had disappeared, or had accomplished many of his other death-defying feats, by some “magical” trick; in fact he was an escape artist, and that is how he was billed. But of course naïve people and children will believe almost anything, and whether they thought Houdini was a mere illusionist or artist or a “real” magician they flocked to his shows because he was entertaining.

If a tree falls in the forest does anybody hear, is a question in a similar vein, or with a similar problem. The question is asked buy Bruce Cockburn in one of his songs but before that others (a poet, like Keats, or whoever it was) asked this and similar posers are well known.

Is the wording the best wording?

If a tree or anything falls, presumably someone will hear, whether a tiny or large creature, because they are equipped with excellent hearing, or because they are in close proximity to the falling tree. Will they know that it is a tree falling? Maybe not. It is always easier to know what event has occurred when one has the use of more than one sense, e.g. seeing, hearing, touching, to know. Many on 911, at the buildings which ‘fell’, reported hearing “explosions”, for example.

Someone might hear a tree falling, and assumes it is a tree, but for sure, he won’t know unless he can verify that’s what it was. If I hear a glass break in another room, I might believe my son has just broken a drinking glass because that happens sometimes, and it is my experience. But if the sound is more like a bottle of jam, I might be able to guess that. I will know once I have investigated, and given my son a stern look for again breaking something I wish he wouldn’t have, especially because I worry he might get hurt and also because I have to clean up after him. Other people have discussed this; how experience serves to give us a level of certainty, although it isn’t always the best way to know things. Our senses and experience can also be used against us, so that we think we have seen something, when in fact we haven’t. We might believe an event is similar to what has happened in the past, only to learn that we have been conned.

Some criminals have used their knowledge of human psychology or fabricated relationships to rob others of their wealth or to get them to help commit crimes, while the dupes don’t even realize. Sometimes, innocent people who have been used by professional criminals or psychopaths are convinced that that person is a good person and that the police are wrong about him/her. It takes a lot of hard evidence to convince someone in such a situation that s/he doesn’t really know that person at all, and that they have been used.

“Fooled once, shame on you, fooled twice, shame on me” or something like that, is good to heed. It is better if people don’t allow themselves to be carried away by feelings which might get them into real trouble. Even the fact that many girls get pregnant, is an example which also shows the sometimes avoidable consequences of trusting others implicitly, or of wishful thinking. People would like to believe that the world is good and that evil is not as common, but the reality is that a lot of evil exists, and also, even if we can’t call a guy who accidentally gets a girl pregnant “evil” (even purposely, though that would be very selfish of him and bad - it isn’t the end of the world, except the girl might perceive it as that, and maybe do something she would later regret, or hurt herself, which makes people hate the guy more, even though he is only partly responsible for the pregnancy but not for graver consequences after that.)

To get back to the main discussion, some questions are riddles which don’t really lend themselves to an answer.

To answer the question, the way that serves my purpose, I would say, firstly, in revelation, we have not read (probably in no text, is this subject ever brought up, that God disappeared) that God/Allah “disappeared”. I think the person asking the question is a child, or believes that I can’t answer the question (because it assumes about God something which isn’t true).

Secondly, in revelation, specifically the Quran, God/Allah tells us that “there is nothing like unto Him”. This is how we speak to the Christians about Allah and that He doesn’t need a son, nor want a son, and it isn’t befitting Allah to have a son. The Quran says if Allah had wanted a son, He could have chosen one from the creation (as opposed to creating Jesus and ‘adopting’ him as a son, which is also an idea with roots in Greek or Roman or pagan history or writings). The fact that Muslims don’t worship the prophet Muhammad, and Jews, (according to most people today), don’t worship any human being, is an indication that in the monotheistic religions, there is a stronger sense that God/Allah is above having a son or appointing anyone as his successor, or above having rivals, and so on. Even the notion that some Christians have that the devil “created evil” or that the devil is “ruling” this world, are not based on a true belief in God or show an incomplete belief and trust in God. Such ideas rather seem to be rooted in fear of the devil and fear of evil, and reveal many peoples’ belief that the world is essentially evil.

But as one scholar points out in a video I saw on an Islamic channel recently, the devil isn’t powerful but can only whisper evil ideas, which people then choose to act on, in their weakness or because they are not good (anyway).

“God Can Do Anything”

Lastly, Allah/God, can do anything, but there are things which He doesn’t do. That is the way most scholars have answered questions like this. Can Allah “disappear” or “appear” or “disappear and reappear”, isn’t about reality, but is about the questioner’s ignorance. This question does have an answer, which is as I just explained that it isn’t befitting Allah’s majesty, to do such things (which have no purpose or reason). There is no reason for Allah to appear to the creation, though people often wish He would (it isn’t for slaves of Allah (the creatures or the creation) to tell Allah what to do, or demand Allah do something, but Allah does what He wills. He is the best disposer of affairs, His command is just, His will is supreme, and He is the Lord of the worlds).

People complain that Allah doesn’t reveal Himself, but this is false. Allah has sent many prophets throughout the ages (to reveal His existence) to us. Allah’s will is revealed to us in the revelation, so that we can know and love Him. Despite the growing number of atheists, there are also a growing number of people who call themselves Muslims.

Allah tells us, that He is “the First” and “the Last”. Allah isn’t going to disappear, in other words. Allah forever is, has been and will be, and He is Most High, Most Great. Allah has 99 names (plus one) names we know, and other names which He knows, which we don’t know. Allah’s attributes describe Him, and these we also can read about in Islamic texts. It isn’t permissible for a person to name himself with Allah’s names, but he can name himself (or name his children) with the slave prefixing the names of Allah e.g. Abdu Rahman, the slave of the Most Merciful, or Abdullah, the slave of Allah. Allah’s attributes are also uniquely His, but it is permissible to say that someone possesses a quality of mercy or a quality of generosity, but only Allah is the Most Merciful, or The Self Sufficient, (Ghani prefixed by al) because only He is truly Self Sufficient. He is The Sustainer, and we are His slaves, who require his sustenance or succor (physical or spiritual).

Proof of God

That some people continually rail against religion and Islam in particular, doesn’t mean that they are right. The proof of God’s existence is all around, and so are proofs in the revelations. Even the Bible foretold the coming of a prophet (not a spirit or ghost, but a human being) after Jesus, A.S., whose name means “the praised one”. Ahmed is the name given in the bible, which is a name for Muhammad (an Arabic name, which also signifies the Prophet, SAWS, accurately) in the Bible, translated from the original word. In the context it was revealed, it is obvious that another Messenger of God is meant. E.g. “the comforter”.

The Grain of Truth

The verse doesn’t describe a spirit or an angel (e.g. Gabriel) because it goes onto say, that “the comforter” will not come until Jesus, A.S., goes away. Jesus describes the “comforter” as someone who will “teach you all things” (sorry if the translation isn’t spot on). The reason God sent human beings as Messengers rather than angels, is that human beings are better able to teach us and also live among us, which makes them perfect examples for us, as opposed to angels who do not understand us, nor know how human beings feel or cannot perceive our humanity the way another person can. Also, if Allah had sent angels to all the people, instead of just to a select few (Abraham, Muhammad and the other Messenger Prophets or sometimes showed obvious signs to some people only), means that we would have already been responsible for our disobedience, and there wouldn’t be much room for humanity to make mistakes or to learn from them. If that was the case, most of humanity would give excuses for their disobedience. That many human Messengers have brought the message of God’s oneness and the monotheistic creed and excelled in worshipping God, and that the great world religions all preach emphatically the existence of God, proves that human beings are created to worship Him. God is Merciful, which is why He sent guidance and books to us. If He had created us without sending us guidance, books or prophets and messengers, then we would think that Allah didn’t intend for us to know Him, or we would think that we have no reason to seek to worship God and love Him or even reason to behave morally.

Humans are Moral Creatures

People behave morally largely because they have been raised that way, and parents generally want children who are obedient, truthful, trustworthy and successful. If children are not raised with “morals” then they will definitely make many more mistakes, errors in judgment, cause problems, even become bad people, or commit crimes and worse. Many modern parents don’t raise their children to worship God or to have belief in a creator, but that doesn’t mean that they are being fair to their children to do so, or that this is real freedom. Many non-believers merely choose to teach their children what they themselves believe, not because it is right, but because they don’t have a religion and don’t want to.

Pagan Arabs Rejection of God Almighty

The ancient people didn’t believe in God because they saw angels, but they saw miraculous things and even angels, because they were in the presence of the prophet(s). Later on, for example, after the revelation had stopped, it wasn’t ever reported (thereafter) that the Muslims saw angel Gabriel (A.S). It was during the process of revelation that they (at least once, is mentioned) saw “a man whose clothing was exceedingly white” and “hair was exceedingly black” and “no signs of travel appeared on him” and no one knew him (in other words, he just appeared). It was the Prophet who informed them that it had been the angel Gabriel (A.S).

Non-believers, such as the pagan Arabs, also experienced some amazing or inexplicable things, but refused to accept the prophet Muhammad’s explanations for such things or events because they refused belief in Muhammad’s message, they refused belief in one God, preferring their hundreds of idols, and they chose to believe that other causes (such as magic or poetry, or even evil spirits) could explain away anything they saw, heard or experienced. They said the Quran was magic, they said the Prophet was a madman or afflicted by an evil spirit, and that the experiences that they or others had, were products of the mind, imagination, spirits, etc. For example, one man trying to kill the Prophet, SAWS, chased after him on a riding animal (camel or horse, I forget which) and continually stumbled when he reached the Prophet, SAWS, until he gave up. There was no common explanation for why the animal refused or was unable to continue the journey – maybe he explained it away, or maybe he became Muslim later (I can’t recall the ending, but it is in the hadiths) Another example, is when the non-believers saw a fire with wings coming out, and thought I guess, that it was some kind of “scary vision”, when they tried to approach the Prophet to harm him. At times, they used to abuse the prophet, physically and verbally, but when they attempted to assassinate him, their attempts (all) failed.

Assassination of Muhammad, pbuh, fails multiple times

The last assassination attempt was when Muhammad, SAWS, was returning from a battle, by a mountain pass, to Mecca. Even then, though there were twelve (or seven to a dozen) people in ambush for him, and only the holy Prophet, SAWS, and one other person with him, the attempt was unsuccessful. Compare this to how an assassination on several American presidents’ despite their security, have been successful, JFK, Robert Kennedy (senator, not President), Abraham Lincoln, before them. And maybe, Daniel Johnson (my history is not great on American presidents). Pope John Paul was also shot, before the bullet proof ride? Though some of these might have been actual inside jobs, or plots, and not done by a crazy person, it still proves that it’s possible to assassinate a person despite vigilance by his body guards and security. And actually, even physical evidence or other evidence isn’t conclusive, and it is hard to prove one way or another – what has really happened. This is why conspiracy theories abound.

Sometimes leaders assassinate their subordinates or enemies, but it is much harder to assassinate a public figure today without leaving some traces of evidence or without a conspiracy theory arising which seems to explain at least some of what happened with some accuracy.



Saturday, March 23, 2013

THE 70 virgins explained, in a way.

THE 70 virgins IN HEAVEN EXPLANNING THANKS FOR SMILING THANKS FOR YOUR KIND - YouTube

Hadiths are for Muslims, not for non-Muslims. The major portion of all hadiths is for the Muslims to find out about details they should know or learn for their own practise of the religion. Hadiths about Paradise are not really for non-believers and they shouldn't be reading them, if they don't believe in God at all. I mean, why bother? I don't go reading the Bible every day, which is like a non-believer reading hadiths; a Muslim reading the Bible or new testament, is like a non-believer studying hadiths. They would do better to study the basics of Islam.

The Prophet Muhammad instructed Muslims to invite people to Islam first, if they accept, then to tell them about their Islamic duties, such as prayer, fasting in Ramaadan, etc. and if they comply, then to continue with the next and the next, most imporant things they should know, or things to do. If they don't accept Islam, then they should either (as a dhimmie, or resident of the Islamic state) give less than 2 % of their wealth per year, to avoid army service, or they could help Muslims protect the state they are living in and have a stake in, by joining the army, or volunteering, or what ever the state tells them is necessary to comply with the gov't concerning dhimmies. Don't Muslims in the West also pay taxes? for example.

If the Islamic state is very powerful, then they can meet the non-believers in other countries, or heads of state and again invite them to Islam, if they refuse, they can have a peace treaty, and of course will not be forced to pay as the dhimmies do, because they are governed by the laws of their own state. But a treaty like this will have its own pros and cons as far as what the Islamic state and un-Islamic state agree to; which would also maybe mean their armies working together, and so on.

Allah knows best, and I ask for His mercy when I make a mistake, due to ignorance or forgetfulness. He is the guide.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

Understanding the Prophet (SAWS)

“Goodness (rightness) is good morality; and sin (misdeed) is what embarrasses you (i.e. you are not comfortable within yourself) and you hate it to be known by others” (Muslim, 15/2553)

The question today - can we really judge people by everything that they or others did in the past? When ancient peoples did things, some of the things they might have been ashamed of, and others they were not ashamed of; should we as people coming much later, with a very different culture and ideas judge those former peoples according to our modern beliefs or standards? I don’t believe we should.

Am I saying this to defend some of the former people’s actions? Perhaps; I prefer to think we can look at ancient cultures and societies without judging them. For what is it about their cultures that we dislike, or disapprove of that is necessary to debate today?

Slavery is all but gone and we can hope the final remnants of slavery will be eradicated but who knows? Women’s rights are not yet equal across the nations nor even practiced all across the board in any modern nation. We can see there are strata where women are very blessed or free, vs. others where they are very poor, or degraded. There is a “glass ceiling” even in corporate boardrooms, or corporations today, which women have not always been able to break through. It takes a very special, intelligent or strong woman to do so. The rest are not able to break through that invisible, unspoken barrier which favors men. The most poverty-stricken people in America are elderly women. It’s the same all over the world.

Everyone accepts the Universal Declaration of Human Rights; no one disputes the rights of children or the rights of women or minorities. All nations agree to the broad categories of human rights; women, children, minorities, freedom of conscience, freedom of religion, freedom from torture, etc.

I mention the above saying of Muhammad, pbuh, to show that there was a concept of “morality” in ancient Arabia. Of course, it evolved once Islam was introduced into the culture and it changed the religion, culture, cultural norms, and effectively created new ideals and examined cultural practices, etc. which were wrong, eliminated or corrected many of the cultural and religious practices, as well explaining what was “sinful” versus what was “virtuous”. Ethics and morals were important to earlier peoples as they are important to societies now.

“Fear Allah wherever you are, follow a bad deed with a good deed as it erases it, and deal with people with high ethics”. (Tirmithi – 1987 & Ahmed 5/153)

Some of the ideals which were noble, such as chivalry, bravery, honesty, are still ideals which people today agree are positive. Other ideals (or ideas), such as male chauvinism, were fought or became unacceptable. People learned that men and women are equal and share the same basic humanity and rights.

“Oh people, it is true that you have certain rights with regard to your women but they also have rights over you. Remember that you have taken them as your wives only under God’s trust and with His permission. Do treat your women well and be kind to them for they are your partners and committed helpers”.

- From Muhammad’s farewell sermon


It was the Prophet’s youngest wife, Aisha, who gave Muslims then and all to follow, the important examples of what was required of Muslim men, regards their wives, families, and society.

Muhammad taught, “Women are the twin halves of men”.

Michael Hart, a writer defended his choice of Muhammad, to lead the list of the top 100 in history, “My choice of Muhammad to lead the list of the world’s most influential persons may surprise some readers and may be questioned by others, but he was the only man in history who was supremely successful on both the religious and secular levels” (From the book, “The 100, A Ranking of the Most Influential Persons in History”)

We can say here that, perhaps Mr. Hart didn’t think Muhammad was the most pious person, and preferred Jesus to Muhammad, but he ranked Jesus second. Or we could speculate that maybe there were others on the list, who though not ranked first, were more self-sacrificing (I am saying this, only to be partial, though I cannot say that I am not really partial about Muhammad, pbuh, as he is the most near to perfection of all Allah’s creatures, nonetheless, I ask others to think about their choice of the most “perfect” human and the reasons they would pick that person.)

Christians will say Jesus was better than Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah unto both of the holy Messengers of God, but I do not distinguish between them or any of the Prophets, for Allah told us, they are “brothers”. Islam speaks about five strong prophets, Abraham, Noah, Moses, Jesus and Muhammad, peace and blessings of Allah unto all of them. There were many others we don’t know by name, and others mentioned by name in the Quran as well as some pious individuals or Saints, including the Mother of Jesus, Maryam (Mary mother of Christ (the Messiah)), may Allah be pleased with her.

The best person, therefore is not only someone who Allah had spoken to, or one who Allah had created with His own hands, or one who he had given the power to heal the blind and lepers or to raise the dead, nor one who was “his special friend”, as Abraham, nor one who He forgave all his sins, Muhammad, or gave him a miracle that would be for all humanity, or the final message, peace and blessings be unto them.

We don’t distinguish between the prophets, and there is no need. Allah sent these Prophets and Messengers to guide people in different times and different places. Therefore, they all were chosen slaves of Allah and the most obedient, praiseworthy and blessed of all the people.

In a narration about the ascension of Muhammad into heaven, Moses says that he had killed a person and send Muhammad to another; Jesus, merely tells Muhammad to go to another of the Prophets of God, Noah says, he had asked Allah something for which he had no right, and so on. We see from many of the stories or narrations that the Prophets of Allah were human beings whom Allah favored from his creation. He says about human fallibility, that if humans did not sin He would have created another creation that would sin, so that they would seek His forgiveness, because Allah, Most High, likes to hear His slaves pleading with Him, and He likes to forgive sins. Allah, azawajal, did not create men to be perfect, but to seek His forgiveness.


People often misunderstand religion. It is the Christians who are most close to the Muslims in their beliefs, though they raised Jesus to a status above his human status, when they said he is the son of Allah. Despite this invention, they believe in the need for repentance. The idea of repentance, and that God would forgive our sins is central to both Christianity and Islam; in Islam the most important belief or pillar of faith being the Oneness of God, and the worship of One God. This is why polytheism or associating others with Allah is called the greatest sin (Shirk al Kabir). Shirk, or joining partners with Allah is the only sin which Allah will not forgive, for which people remain forever in Hell. If it was not for that, they would all be Muslims. The Jews believe that they are “the Children of God” or His “chosen people” a concept foreign both to Islam and Christianity. It is in fact a racist idea which permits many heinous crimes in the name of their religion (in reality they kill and occupy for “Zionism” and Zion.)

Therefore, we do not say that the Prophets were perfectly sinless, but we believe that Allah guided them to the best forms of worship, the best supplications and prayers, the best ideals, and the best moral code and superior moral conduct. As a result of their good deeds and prayers, Allah forgave the Prophets their mistakes. It is famously recorded that Prophet Muhammad used to seek Allah’s forgiveness 70 times a day.

Muhammad, pbuh, was sent first and foremost to his own people, the ancient Arabs. But because Islam rooted out racism and enjoined many more of the modern ideals we take for granted, it is rightly called a universal religion.

Therefore, you will hear Muslims say that Islam is a religion for all time and place. (It is generally understood as such.) Where I might differ with some Muslims is that Islam is certainly compatible with today’s modern ideals. Some Muslims believe that Islam must “reform”; they don’t understand that Islam already is capable of meeting the challenges of social reform without the religion needing reform or improvement.

Sometimes what people will complain about are not cultural or religious ideals which need fixing, but moral values which they believe are now outdated. If we listen to such people, we would accept many evils in the name of freedom or modernity.

Lastly, the name Muhammad means in Arabic, “the person who is highly, frequently and repeatedly praised for his good deeds. Therefore, he is a praiseworthy person.”(P. 3, Muhammad, Who Is He? A pocket guide, produced by Discover Islam Center, 2012)

The fact that one is a praiseworthy person, or even a Prophet and Messenger of Allah, doesn’t affect his status as a human being, and this means that as other people he goes through trials, is subject to worries and misgivings, stumbles and falls, even. It is true that Prophet Moses had in his ignorance, killed a man, and Prophet Yunus (Jonah) had sought to run away from his Prophetic mission despairing of the peoples’ conversion to his religion, Islam. (Islam is the universal religion and was the religion of all the previous prophets and messengers of God.) It is also true that the Prophets, like all people, used to ask for forgiveness of Allah. They did not believe themselves free from error, responsibilities or worry. In fact, they prayed often, repented often, performed more good deeds seeking Allah’s pleasure, to show their grateful attitude to Allah for the many blessings which He bestowed upon them. They also relied on Allah to help them perform the task He set out for them to do; preaching the Oneness of God, Allah, and establishing a community of believers, who would then call others to Islam.

Therefore, we believe that Islam is the universal religion, and that all the Prophets or Messengers of Allah called to the worship of Allah.

Statements about Muhammad, pbuh:

“Whoever saw him unexpectedly would admire and revere him. And whoever socialized or associated with him familiarly, loved him. He was gentle by nature. He was neither coarse nor disdainful of anyone.”(P. 15, Ibid).

He told his friends, “I am a guarantor for a house at the outskirt of the Paradise for those who quit arguing even if they were right and I am a guarantor for a house in the middle of Paradise for those who quit lying even if they were kidding and I am a guarantor for a house in the highest part in the Paradise for those who behave with good manners.” (Sahih Abu Dawood)

Muhammad, pbuh, never found fault or overpraised others, nor got angry for his own sake. He did not speak unnecessarily, nor accept (an) other’s(s’) lauding his praises. He was unfailingly cheerful. But if he was angry when Allah’s law was violated, then his face would express strong emotion and displeasure. (Pp. 14-15, Muhammad, Who Is He?, 2012.)

“Muhammad never got angry for his own sake” (P. 15, Ibid)

Concluding remarks:

As it is not possible for any person to remove himself or disassociate himself from his own time, or the age into which he was born, nor his place; just as the bronze age man could not have imagined electricity, nor invented glass nor filaments for lights, it is not probable that men of Muhammad’s time would have changed everything around them; no more than what they were capable in a quarter of a century, nor that the next generation of Muslims which followed or generations for the next few centuries could have known or understood more than the ethical questions which Islam confronted. Many other social norms; ‘pithy’ preferences, which may or may not be regarded as ‘backwards’, inhumane, or injustice today, were not all questioned (neither eradicated nor once and for all banned) in the early Islamic Empire; nor would those people be responsible for our misguidance, just we are not responsible for the misguidance of theirs. Only Allah is the judge, and that is what all people can at least agree on, who believe in God and fear Him. It is enough to say that the Muslims have definitely evolved. Islam did that. Islam teaches, “There is neither harm nor reciprocating harm” a general ethos, which can be applied to any situation; any people can use it, it is workable anywhere.

It is recorded, that Aisha (RA) once said, “If alcohol had been banned (forthwith) the Arabs in Muhammad’s time would not have become Muslims” (although I am paraphrasing) In fact, during one of the earlier reigning Russian Czar’s time, he refused Islam on the very same pretext. In fact, it was not only a pretext, he must have felt it impossible to give up the freedom to drink alcohol, because that was one of their (Russians) lives’ greatest pleasures (or an addiction); then the Czar accepted Christianity, and since then, the religion even today, in some of the former Russian Empire has been one form or other of Christianity. Of course Islam also invaded (they tried to peacefully preach Islam and were challenged) later and took root; in the Bikhar region (e.g. Uzbekistan) also Chechnya, the Ukraine, etc.

I quote Yusuf Estes who said, “…not worshipping the Prophets, not worshipping the Messengers, putting them in a higher (sic) status saying only good about them.” Or what is often said, we say, not exaggerating their status beyond their human capacity for good and evil. I ask, “Who doesn’t sin?” The bible says, Jesus said, “He who has not sinned, shall cast the first stone”. Everyone has sinned, including the Holy messengers of Allah. We say they are holy, meaning they were the most holy of humans, but they were not perfect. The Catholics call their priests “holy”, too. It means that they think they are better than everyone else, not that they are perfect. It means that they believe there is a way to God through those people. Maybe, they can forgive us? That’s what the Catholics believe about their priests, that they can forgive them their sins. On the other hand, in Islam people go directly to God; Muslims pray for forgiveness, which also, all others do, who believe in God, but Muslims are sure that they never associate others with God, such as another human being. There is no priest class in Islam; no one can forgive sins for us; only God can forgive us. Forgiveness is easier than one might think, just pray sincerely to be forgiven and never do the sin again; that’s called “repentance” and it’s the only way to get forgiveness. God already knows what you did...you don’t have to tell another living soul, or breath a word of your sin, because that is not going to make you feel any better, especially if you believe that God won’t forgive you. You have to believe that God is the forgiver of sin, the Most Gracious, Most Merciful. Allah said, “I am what my slave thinks I am”, which means, if you believe Allah is forgiving, He will be. If you think Allah is generous, He will be. Etc.



(Where I have erred it is due to my own weakness or fault, and where I have stated the correct interpretations or beliefs, it is due to Allah. I ask Him for guidance.)