Showing posts with label Sharia. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sharia. Show all posts

Thursday, February 23, 2017

What is Jihad, Seriously, Again??

"Please point me in the direction of a copy of quran and sharia that you believe is right. And I will see if it differs from those I have allready. No compulsion in religion Holy war is the duty of all moslems."

Someone wrote, the above and wants to know, What is Jihad?

The reply I wrote, follows below. If anyone has a better definition or explanation, please feel free to send me
an email or comment below, thankx. The comments are 'screened', like Muslims at an international airport, before posting, so it may take a while before you see your comment.

Reply:
No, there is no "Holy War". That's a Christian evangelical idea. Their words. Jihad simply means striving in the path of God. If someone builds schools, mosques, roads, wells, that's all charity that earns rewards for the person who donates to such projects. It is the best kind of charity, something that benefits for a long time.There are types of jihad, too. Fighting one's own desires, is also jihad. When many people talk about Islam or jihad, all they talk about is "unjust war". War in Islam is for defense.
The Battle of Badr and Battle of Uhud, the two most remembered battles didn't have many deaths or casualties compared to many other wars. The pagans or the Muslims had to go. God favored the Muslims in the end, and Medina was established as a Muslim capital. It took Muhammad, over twenty years of preaching but most of the Arab pagans converted after that. Mekkah was a bloodless victory, in that everyone surrendered, and only the criminals were not released (there was actually one man who went into the Kaabah to escape and he was killed).
The head leader, Abu Jahal had died, and some of the others had already converted before the Fateh al Mekkah, that day, so the rest of their tribe soon followed, like Khalid Ibn Walid, who later converted, but Abu Sufyan another famous person had converted before that, and his wife was HInd, a woman who had hired an assassin to kill the Prophet's uncle Hamza. Despite this, they converted of their own free will when God willed. And became good Muslims.
Another case in point is the Jews and hypocrites in Medina who sided with them, after declaring their Islam, which people always bring up. Why were Jews killed in Medina or evicted? Because they were traitors. Do you want traitors who attack you to be given a free pass?? Do you only HATE Muslims but LOVE traitors?? No. War is just at certain times. Americans will "never forget" 911 but they forgot Iraq's innocent children very quickly. (SOMETIMES SOME) Americans and (SOMETIMES SOME)Christians are some of the worst hypocrites alive today. Muslims don't say that war isn't justified, but they believe that killing innocents is forbidden.
If some Muslims do that, they are the worst criminals. STOP saying (not you personally) that Muslims never say anything when terrorist attacks occur. We are against terrorism and killing of innocents, but when we say that, who is listening?? Oh. No one.. Obviously you still believe the lies about Islam or you wouldn't be asking about "No compulsion in religion". Don't be lazy and do some of your own reading. One book which is pretty good is "The Sealed Nectar". It won't cost you an arm and a leg. It is a biography of the Prophet Muhammad, and tells a lot about the battles, including Badr and Uhud, and why the Jews (traitors) were killed. It won a prize for the best biography in a contest, and was written by an Indian Muslim scholar and translated into English. There are many hadiths showing how kind and generous the Prophet Muhammad was. His character is pure and good, but non-Muslims want to make his character vile and evil. God forbid we should not defend him.
There is no translation that will do justice to the Quran, not just because it's Arabic, but because translators are human beings, and other languages also aren't as great as the Quranic Arabic. English, especially, is a young language, and you can see how it is being destroyed today. But there are some translations that are better than others. The Yusuf Ali one was edited because it had bigger problems than some others.
The Bible has many verses that must be embarrassing for Christians, some people say the same thing about Hadiths. Well, the hadiths aren't the word of God. (There are Hadiths Qudsi, which are God's words revealed to Muhammad, but not part of the Quran). But the majority of hadiths/sayings or traditions are not God's words, and also they were written and compiled after a long time. So they are more like what the Bible is in terms of how long after the events they were collected into books. The bible is also not God's word, so that explains why there are a lot of wrong things in it. No offence to people who read it to study it and get some good out of it. Cherry picking verses is the past-time of the non-Muslims. They do it with their own book and with the Quran (translation of the meaning of the Quran). But many people still say it is one of the best today (if you get the edited version). Learning Arabic is impossible for most people. But it is different when you know some Arabic and can read the original. That being said, the problem isn't even which translation but that people read with a closed mind, and there's no 'medicine' for that, except to ask God to open your heart and mind. Shariah is Islamic law, there is only one "islamic law". There are colleges that teach Usul Fiqh, jurisprudence. They will teach about the way to understand and apply laws. You know, stuff I haven't studied indepth.
There are many non-Muslims in Muslim majority states and they are not all fighting each other. Muslims work with non-Muslims here. We have a fairly peaceful country. The government is fair, and people are free to live and work. There is also one of the oldest Catholic Churches in the ME in our country (I am a citizen now too, as are many people who got their citizenship in the past couple of decades).
Just like any other person studies law, it is studied in Muslim countries, and also some other countries today. There is ijtihad, which is consensus of opinion, where a question is something the scholars today may not know about, such as things that never happened in the past, or for which there is no ruling. In law this is like looking for precedents, and if there aren't any then you derive an opinion from looking at the whole body of works on that subject and using their brains. Judges can be wrong, also when making judgments, and this is not denied. But Islamic law lays a lot of emphasis on proofs, and circumstantial evidence isn't emphasized. Even if a man is found with a knife in his hand at the scene of a stabbing death, doesn't prove his guilt, for example. There was such a case and the judge makes sure that he gets to the truth, if possible, or else the person can't be convicted of murder. In a very old case which happened, a man was actually found not guilty, because it turned out he confessed because he thought none would believe him anyway if he told the truth. He had come upon a murder scene, grabbed the weapon and then been found by people. Later, a man actually confessed, because he was afraid that he would be responsible for the murder of the victim plus the unjust killing of the person who confessed to the killing. I guess stranger things have happened. There *is* no compulsion in religion, so just go about your life like you always have if you have no interest in learning about Islam. Men are responsible for the expenses even when women work. That doesn't mean women marry men for their money, like many people say. Many non-Muslim women also are converting to Islam here, and also men are converting to Islam. There is no forced conversion. People are free to live and work, and they are free to worship wherever they are able to do that. In Canada, Muslims often pray at work, on their break, and it's not against the law. Why do people think freedom of religion is such a difficult concept??
Good day.

I THINK THIS IS ADDED LATER? :

I live in Bahrain, and it's fine, people have recreation and all the many things that they have back home, even many of the same foods, restaurants and fast food places, they may have a church (it varies in the ME from country to country). Not every Christian denomination has a church obviously. But it isn't the responsibility of a government to give land away for every church that some people want. I think the same goes of the masjids (mosques) in non-Muslim countries.I don't object to laws that are meant to protect people, and countries have a right to make such laws. But there are also laws against wrongful oppression of immigrants, etc. It is not only fair, but required that governments treat all their citizens equally and punish the wrongdoers, but not wrongfully convict innocent people or treat people who are not criminals like criminals. All governments, if they abide by the humanitarian laws, will treat citizens and also immigrants, or visa workers with kindness, justice and secure their peaceful existence and human dignity. Unfortunately,that's not always the case, is it? Islam has human rights, and even animal rights. These are binding in the Islamic texts, and are obvious.



[Jane Dughatir] Thanks for reading! Have a nice day/evening :)

(EDITS are in round brackets: when I probably insulted many ppl already I was informed by a friend about the error/mistake and corrected my wrong sentence. I have already apologized on social media. #clickbait #racism)

Sunday, December 8, 2013

Little Red & Peace & Love - Part 3

Zaha S Asks:

Yesterday 12:15 AM
What exactly am I being ignorant about?


tvee, wrote 

Yesterday 10:15 PM

"+Jane Dughatir I'll be the first to tell you I don't have an in-depth understanding of Islam, let alone the basics. From reading your comments here, I would rather learn about Islam and appreciate it from Zaha S rather than you. At least I'll certainly be guaranteed of a rational, objective and intelligent discussion on Islamic teachings and issues faced by Muslims. I doubt that's probable with you! Are you truly knowledgeable about Islamic teachings? Perhaps. Are you an arrogant person? Yes. Are you objective and possess some intelligence? Absolutely….. NOT! That's just my opinion. U are so stupid, you can't even process the meaning of words in your hollow head. Where in my comment did I say sufis are 'kind'? I mentioned the words 'gentle', 'compassionate', 'love, 'peace' 'tolerance' and 'universal brotherhood'. I'm not a genius but please only reply back to me if you have an IQ equal to or higher than my 128. It's utterly frustrating trying to communicate with stupid AND arrogant people!"

Besides the redundancy, it is a load of b.s . Is he serious?? Oh I believe him, I just think it is full of “righteous indignation” at being “insulted” (my words: righteous indignation is the belief that you have the right to be angry [or indignant] even though others don’t agree.). In this case, I don’t agree that he has a right to be indignant, angry or sad; he should be embarrassed for behaving childishly - however, if he is sad that he doesn’t understand Islam properly, then good.

“I’ll be the first to tell you I don’t have an in-depth understanding of Islam, let alone the basics.” …etc…

He admits ignorance, totally…BUT…

[And] “Perhaps. Are you an arrogant person? Yes. Are you objective and possess some intelligence? Absolutely….. NOT! That's just my opinion. U are so stupid, you can't even process the meaning of words in your hollow head. Where in my comment did I say sufis are 'kind'? I mentioned the words 'gentle', 'compassionate', 'love, 'peace' 'tolerance'”

Ha-ha. It is so sad, it is tragically funny. I really wish he has a chance to reflect after cooling down. BUT, the ball is in his court, he can do that or not.

I have one line of questioning:

If he admires the sufis so much, he should really try much harder to become like them. I don’t think a Sufi would take someone to task just for saying someone different than them said another person is “nice” and misquoted him when he really said “gentle, compassionate, love peace tolerance,”!!

Then he expects me to believe he is a good person and I am mistreating him and have been arrogant?? Yes, I am telling you what Islam really is, according to what I believe and have studied for years, both on my own and in a real classroom in a University setting. Don’t insult MY intelligence. I’m glad I never claimed to have the IQ of a genius just to “score points”. I don’t have to do something that childish and innane, which is also impossible to prove, so totally pointless.



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:05 PM

Since name calling is permissible I did some of my own as that is what he did first (“He did it first” - this is turning into a useless exercise., which is why I ALWAYS say, “Debates are counterproductive to Understanding Islam” unless you really pay attention)

ur the idiot, obviously. So in your dictionary kind and compassionate isn't any thing close to what you described about the sufi person you met?? Are you serious or just being a troll? I wasn't quoting you, should be obvious, I was describing how you explained that you met the nice sufi guy and that it seems you believe all Musilms in your eyes are not equal to the task, of being kind or good people except a sufi or someone like Zaha, who can't defend her own religion's teachings, if she is indeed a Muslims (sic), which I'm not certain of either. Anyone who reads this will consider you an absolute moron. Excuse me if you didn't say kind, lol. You are more arrogant if you think ur ranting is going to fool anybody. I don't care if you believe I'm foolish or arrogant because obviously you have no sense at all!! good day. Unlike you, I do have a basic understanding of Islam at the very least, and unlike you, I don't fall for ignorant ppl's claims e.g. what zaha had said, because she wants to be a weak person who kisses ass of Islamophobes or her non-Muslim friends or family or maybe she is also not even Muslim, I don't know if she is or not. Considering her level of ignorance, I wouldn't be surprised if she doesn't even pray, even if she is Muslim. Or know how to pray. I don't care to have any more dialogue with you. so plz don't send another reply defending your position.+tvee with the high IQ which is totally not true, or youre a monkey's uncle.



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:12 PM

where is Zaha? she can't say anything more to defend herself and needs you,

Mr. T?? +tvee



Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:29 PM

Just to quote some of what little Zaha S had said previously, "Its apart of a terrible cultural practice in the Middle East I thought that was already established. Yes it is something good because it is my way of life and I see it as beautiful and peaceful and if more people embrace that lifestyle then that makes me happy. What propaganda? I'm still itching my head at your ignorance, I don't think you're an idiot though, just misinformed. There is no such thing as forced Islam and most reverts find Islam on their own. Ask me anything, what did I ignore? I apologize if I ignored anything."

She is scratching her head, after lying about Islam, which the non-Muslim terente P is more knowledgeable about then herself!! Yes, there are beheadings in Saudi Arabia, as a punishment, which still occur now. And in Iran, ppl also are killed; It is strange however, that many women, not as many men, it seems, are killed for sexual crimes there, but how can this be Islamic? There seems to be something else at work besides women being promiscuous, and I wonder what their "crime" really is?? (Slight revision - about Iran - just to make clear that I don’t approve of what happens in Iran, though Iran claims to practice sharia as well. They have a different understanding of Islam than Sunnis, however. I dare say very different in many aspects. I say I don’t approve, but I don’t say I would impose my will on them, and that goes for the sufis and all other groups or branches of Islam or sects. As long as they don’t claim to have rights over me, I don’t have a dispute with them. But if they are hurting their citizens and are extremely unjust, maybe I will comment, and that’s my right, too. December, 8th)

But Zaha (and others) don't deny things that are even written in the papers or seen in public squares in Saudi or Iran. Yes, sharia calls for some criminals to be beheaded or sexual crimes like adultery to be punished with stoning. Anyone who knows anything about Islam knows this. It is a weak Muslim who denies this.
Do Muslims want to kill all non-Muslims, NO. Do Muslims want to hang non-Muslims for having boyfriends and girlfriends in their own country? NO. Do we want to have people in non-Muslim countries who steal punished with the Islamic punishment if they have stolen something equal to twenty bucks, say? NO.

State the real position on Islamic topics, don't make up your own ideas or an entirely different religous point of view (that's not permitted in Islam, ask any educated Muslim). It is wrong to lie about the religion, period. I don't care if you are nice and want friends all over the internet and want non-Muslims to love you, it is non (sic) sanctioned by the religion, to lie about your religion. If you are that ignorant, be quiet, for your own sake!!

Jane Dughatir

Yesterday 11:56 PM

Islam is only right for those willing to accept it, says Zaha S, lol. So its only right for Musilms (sic). We actually believe it is right for everybody, but that doesn't mean other ppl will become Muslim. And that is their own business. But don't say such things, I am afraid your English needs refreshing. I don't blame otherrs (sp)for their poor English but if your English isn't up to par or isn't at a certain level of proficiency, you should watch how you say things and what you say in general, so you are not taken to task for unintended meanings or blatantly wrong ideas.


Zaha S

1:02 AM

I don't think you understood what I was saying. Of course Islam is for everyone, as everyone is born a Muslim. But what I meant is that it should not be forced on anyone. Please refrain from insulting me, I hope you meant well. M3asalama.


Advice for Zaha,

I know what you meant, but you didn’t say that; that’s my point; be careful and revise your mistakes. ["Of course Islam is for everyone, ....", she wrote the next time, which is what she "wanted" to say, but 'somehow' turned it 180 degrees, into an opposite idea !! ] If you make blatant mistakes, such that you apologize for everybody, you are telling them you think it is okay to be whatever they want (according to most, it is okay). It is even their legal right to do and believe what they wish, but it isn’t going to help them in their search for "enlightenment" if You LIE.. Don’t say, Islam isn’t for everybody, it is, so why did you say that in the first place?? Say what you mean… and apologize if you said something incorrect.

********
The bigger problem is her lying about Islam. And I have already gone over all that. If you care about ppl then you want to tell them what Islam really teaches, not make up stuff, or pretend you know what you don’t know. People love to get along and not to rock the boat, but that means they also lie about their beliefs just to please others; which is what you seem to be doing. Or you are preaching about Islam without correct knowledge.


Zaha S

1:14 AM

+Jane Dughatir I don't really understand what I'm denying either? It is true what you said about Saudia and Iran I never denied that, what I'm saying is their governments are not Islamic! No country in the world practices Sharia law perfectly. I also mentioned that crimes like those are punishable but not all by death, because at the end of the day you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives (of course some things like rape and murder are another story). Thank you for calling someone you don't know a weak Muslim and "little" I really appreciate that. I'm not going to spend my time responding to someone who insults me, especially a fellow Muslim. If you are Muslim yourself you would know that Islam preaches kindness. Once again M3asalama.


J D-N 

2:21 AM

salaam, dear. No, you said the specific crimes that were discussed such as sexual crimes are not punishable and they are. So is stealing. That's in Islam when a country properly practices sharia, which is why even though Saudi and Iran are not perfect models of Islam, they do have such punishments which have always been done in Saudi, following the way of the early Muslims. People read about Islam and books are easy to find, as well as some proper sites on internet. ..."You can't fool everybody all of the time." And you can't fool me. Yes, ma'a salaam. Islam also preaches knowledge of your religion. Even many non-Muslims know Islam better and defend it better than you do.


J D-N

2:47 AM

Well, being that Zaha is a Libyan and American answers a lot, lol. I know many, many Libyans who were ignorant of their religion so much that they would defend the non-Muslim's calendar saying it is better than the very accurate Islamic Hijri calendar, which is based on the phases of the moon. Anything Islamic, they would run away from. So, yes, I get that Zaha, is somewhat afraid of Islam, and doesn't appreciate the need for sharia.

If you prayed in Libya in the mosque regularly you ended up in prison. Yet Ghaddafi claimed he was a defender of Muslim rights, or that's what the west told everyone. So, little Zaha's family moved to the west and raised her as a non hiijab wearing ignorant Muslim, who doesn't have a proper Islamic grounding..and is afraid of Islam's reality, much like non-believers she tries to convince that Islam is not what they read in the hadiths books. But for the most part, it really is. I am not talking about misinterpreted texts, but true Islam as taught in Islamic colleges in the gulf states. These are colleges which accept people who have at minimum a highschool GPA of 70% or higher, and who can learn or read Arabic, who can memorize Quran. Such people who can devote themselves to studying at University level, and who are serious about learning. I'm not speaking of children's Islamic study halls, or musallas. As for those who are "weak" and "afraid" you should Stop! making up lies to defend your religion! Islam doesn't need you to lie for Islam. Islam is good and it is the Truth. #Quran #islam #Muhammad

Why do I say Zaha is “little” , or “weak and afraid” ,because she behaves like a child. She is “weak” in her Islamic knowledge or her practice. Does she wear a hijab? Not in her photo. Should she? Should she post photos of herself (according to the sharia) or should she cover her hair at least?

She isn’t practicing as much as many other Muslim girls or women do. Many also are like her, I know that. It is her responsibility if she knows Islam, to practice it properly. I am not going to judge her here or anytime, but God will. As a Muslim I hope she considers that.

[I wonder if tvee is her brother. He seems to defend her a lot, but he says he is an atheist.
There are many Libyans who were communists, so atheism isn’t a far stretch for them. But that’s enough about that.]



Little Red & Islam Means "Love" - Part 2

(Zaha S, says)

Ummm first and foremost Allah is Arabic for God and lol I don't think you fully understand the meaning of "Islamophobe". I don't agree with these terrorist groups and most good pious Muslims don't either but they have power, money, and believe it or not the Western governments backing them up so there is not much we can do except use our voices. The only spread of Islam you're talking about is peaceful just like Mormons or Jehovah's witness' at your door on a Sunday morning except even less. Honestly the only thing I'm really concerned about is people looking at weird groups or countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia as models of Islam and thats the opposite no country on earth is representing Islam correctly unfortunately. So please please please as a fellow human being talk to a Muslim about our way of life, don't gather info from Islamophobe sites or people. Happy Turkey Day :)

terente P , says:

+Zaha S

no matter what allah in arabic means! its about what are the properties of that allah and they indicate satan, not god. if that what arabs understand as god its actually satan, then is satan their god! worshipers of satan = muslims

you take the arabic meaning of god but tell further down saudi arabia is a weird country :))

you claim there are only some bad examples, but you cant mention a single islamic country where islam isnt bullshit - islam isnt peaceful, no matter which country we take as example

-honour killings

-minor marriages

-death penalties for homosexuality, sex outside marriage, apostates

-slavery

-oppression of women generally

....

we dont need spreading of islam!


Zaha S

Nov 29, 2013  
"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God). Yeah exactly there are no countries where Islamic law is practiced correctly. And it really does make me mad because there are extremist groups who are absolutely horrid, very UnIslamic, and they oppress all those around them and people who aren't Muslim get the wrong idea. All those supposed "properties" of Islam you mentioned are not Islamic at all they are cultural. I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God) because Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land and inherit WAAY before the West did. Like I said a lot of what you said is cultural like honor killings, minor marriages, it is true that homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death . Slavery is also forbidden in Islam. I could go on this makes me so sad that you're so misinformed. If you don't like peace then so be it but please refrain from criticizing my way of life. I love all of God's creation and so I do care that you understand Islam correctly."



terente P

Nov 30, 2013  

you are the one who is totaly misinformed about islam if you claim that would be cultural and not islamic!

"homosexuality, sex outside of marriage, and being an apostate is forbidden but they are not punishable by death"

I can show you fatwas which tell that homosexuality and apostasy must be punished by death. and even if it would be only forbiden, why should it be forbiden? that reveals the intolerant and totalitary character of islam!

"Slavery is also forbidden in Islam."

Qatar is treating their guest workers like slaves and also in every islamic country there is slavery. all that is according to sharia, the jurisdiction in islam (from allah)

and what kind of filthy culture is that, which includes all that atrocities? thats no culture! its coming from that filthy book, quran

"Islam gave me the right to vote, to divorce, to run a business, to own land"

dont tell bullshit! women arent allowed to vote in islamic countries, nor to divorce. all that rights are given to you by our democracy, our human rights in the west! you have nothing like that in islam! where did you get all that rights in islam if you already claimed that no islamic country practice it correctly? YOU LIE, LIKE EVERY MUSLIM BEING GAME OVER! :))

and how is looking that correct islam, if it isnt practiced anyplace?

"refrain from criticizing my way of life"

so far your way of life interfere mine, not only that i will criticize,but I also fight it!

"I'm a Muslim women Al7amdulliallah (Thank God)"

why thank god? that means you see yourself as something better than those who arent mulsims. that is muslim infatuation!

"The same God I pray to everyday is the same God you pray to (if you believe in God)"

no, it isnt, because the quran's god is satan
you worship satan when you pray every day

"If you don't like peace..."

islam doesnt know peace! islam is obediance, oppression, violence, hate, submission, conquest, ....

stop spreading that filthy cult around the world! nobody like muslims, there are everywhere problems with them. if you dont put and end peacefully to that insanity of an illiterate pedophile sik man from 1440yrs ago, we will have to put an end, no matter what we have to do for that. we have to protect our cultures and our future from that threat called islam!



tvee

Nov 30, 2013

+Zaha S You are absolutely right! Your comments are refreshing and enlightening. You are obviously a person who values PEACE and LOVE amongst ALL people. I'd like to know your opinion about 2 question I have - Wasn't Islam as practiced during the early years of the Prophet Mohammed influenced by the Arabian tribal and cultural traditions and values of the people at that time? Beheadings for some crimes? Honor punishments? chopping of limbs? Are beheadings and cutting of limbs for punishment mentioned in the Quran? 2nd question - in your opinion, which Islamic country today comes CLOSEST to being truly Islamic? I know you said there are none, but the closest (even if it is a far shot)?



Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

+tvee Hey thanks, and its nice to meet someone with the same values regardless of their background and who they are! During the early years of Islam Prophet Muhammed and his few but growing followers were looked down upon, beaten, tortured, for their differing views which were going against what you're talking about plus to give charity to the needy, stop worshipping idols, abolish slavery etcc. Killing is not mentioned in the Quran unless it is in self defense, in time of war, or if someone has committed murder and proven guilty. The punishments mentioned for doing something forbidden can differ from lashings to prison time depending and then they are forgiven just as God is all forgiving. These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices. Personally I'm a Libyan-American and I haven't seen any good Islamic countries and the biggest reason is culture. I know this because I've met the best practicing Muslims here in the states, and its because they don't have that culture to influence them. Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West and 3/4 of those reverting are women. Nice talking, as long as you don't insult what I believe in then I respect you and your views :)



I have to stop here, and note some important details in point form, because there are so many!!

Zaha uses modern colloquialisms, often punishments are “horrid”; “random fact”, Etc. So I know for a fact she is a “girl”. I called her a “little girl” which she took offence at, but at least she didn’t get called worse names. So I’m not a nice person, sue me!! But the point being, I believe she is a “little girl”. It isn’t a crime to make a character judgment on the internet, even she should know that internet is impersonal and therefore, I can make judgments as I see fit. I didn't say it just to get a rise out of her, that would have been trolling. I don't do much of that.

Did I ever claim to be a nice person, or very nice? Does that matter in a debate which only requires facts? FACTS are what COUNT> being nice doesn’t mean a thing. Obviously, Terente P doesn’t care that Zaha wants “to be his friend”, and “cares about him” (my words).

The two people who do care about being friends are Zaha and Mr. T (tvee) because they have found allies in their fight for “peace”. Their peace initiative is however built on sand and not a rock, and in the real world, would fall, because you can’t have lasting peace or love built on lies.

Zaha mentions, punishments from lashings to prison time, “depending”. She is talking about serious punishments for serious crimes. But there is lashing for “fornication” and lashing for “slandering people” but if the slander amounts to accusing someone of adultery, the punishment will be flogging and the person's total humiliation - their word would never be any good, and that is something very dishonorable in Islam! Islam doesn’t permit slandering “good or chaste women” it says in the Quran. The Quran specifically mentions this sin, and especially about women, though it is the same whether a man or woman is wrongly accused.

Zaha doesn’t give specifics, okay fine. But she does then say, that “lashings and prison time” are the punishments, and that there aren’t “beheadings” or “killing” except for (we are talking about punishments not war, here) “MURDER” only. She doesn’t know or doesn’t agree that Islam punishes homosexuality (or there are examples of this in the hadiths) and adultery (the married person committing fornication, not a single person - even if he or she has sex with a married person)

I’m not going to discuss sharia more than this, just to be clear. But it is true there are examples in the traditions or hadiths/sayings, that homosexuals should be thrown off a cliff or killed e.g. stoned, I imagine. I would have to review that. (Since stoning is the lot of an adulterer I imagine it is one way to punish homosexuality which is just a different kind of “illegal sex which is forbidden” But the reason homosexuality deserves death is because “if adultery is forbidden, so is homosexuality forbidden forever” (my own words). There is no marriage in Islam between gays or lesbians, so the marriage amounts to fornication, if the ppl are unmarried or adultery if a married man or woman is having a sexual relation with another person , even if they are divorced, and not married anymore) Anyway, facts are facts. This doesn’t mean there is a lot of killing of homosexuals today however, because there are not so many ppl in Saudi or Iran “coming out” or practicing a homosexual lifestyle in plain view of the government. (That would be suicide, which is also forbidden, lol. Sorry for the moment of brevity about an important topic, FOS) Homosexuality is a worse crime than mere fornication, so that is again why it is punishable by death. Fornication between single men and women isn’t punishable by death.

Here I will just add also that I don’t believe there are very many homosexuals in the Gulf States, but for sure not many in Saudi Arabia and certainly they don’t practice openly. (In Mecca there are not homosexuals practicing openly, that is really unimaginable to me. So I say it’s impossible) However, there are openly gay or transvestites, at least, in Bahrain. Bahrain is a small island country with a monarch, King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifah. It has a border crossing (a bridge) with Saudi Arabia, and many Saudis also arrive in the Kingdom every week for visits or shopping, etc.

If someone is homosexual I don’t think they would dare practice their lifestyle in public in Saudi, they are gay not stupid. Also, if they come to Saudi for work or are in the armed forces or navy and visit the city of Riyadh, or other places, they probably should keep a low profile. That’s my advice, but I’m sure these men and women know that. They receive all kinds of cultural training, so much so that Western or European women even often wear a veil or some completely cover, as you can see one elderly woman on YouTube™ do.

Also, whether one is gay or straight, they should follow the law, or they risk punishment, which in case of drug offences, drinking in public, or other, are strictly illegal and could mean jail time, deportation, or maybe even worse. The government does often forgive criminals or release them to go home after they have served some of their sentence or paid fines. If not, then after they have served a full sentence. There might also be capital punishment for some foreigners, but I don’t recall specific cases. It is something I could research; I saw one documentary about a murderer, who was serving jail time, of twenty five years maybe, for murdering his Saudi sponsor. He says he accepted Islam in prison, so maybe he did that sincerely, and isn’t being killed, or he did it to avoid a more severe punishment and is not really Muslim, but I shouldn’t speculate on that.

She also talks about sitting in the back seat instead of in the front with the man who is driving her, because she isn’t permitted to drive. And she knows that his wife would not like also if he had a woman sitting in the front with him. She doesn’t say that it makes her feel second class however, that’s just how it is there. And as a “guest” of the Kingdom, she respects the culture enough to follow the social norms and also the law of the country.



terente P

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S "These beheadings and "honor" punishments you're talking about don't really occur that much in the Muslim world not as much as the media makes them out to be, but they do happen and they are horrid cultural practices."

you still aren’t able to answer what kind of culture is that!? i never heard that beheadings and killings can be seen as culture...

"Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesn’t mean its autmaticaly good

and that’s only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldn’t be like that, there wouldn’t be convertions!

and why should be forced islam to grow like that? don’t you have repect for other religion?
there are a lot of questions you have no answer and put your islam in bad view. but you ignore it, like every shameless muslim i have met until now...


What I think:

I have to differ with terente P as well on some points:

Islam isn’t a culture without a religion and religion takes precedence, even though cultural differences aren’t all discouraged. So yes, the punishments are dictated by the religion when we are speaking about sharia. But there are cultural “beheadings and honor killings” which we hear about sometimes on the news, as well. IN fact, “honor killings” are purely a cultural practice and have no sanction in Islamic law, because “honor killings” are always done by the family and usually punish women or girls who might be falsely accused, or a young unmarried couple in love, who also do not deserve death or “honor killing” by stoning or any other way. Previously unmarried men and women or youth are not ever killed in Islam. So, it is being done in Muslim majority countries but is even forbidden by Islam. No one is to be killed except in four cases e.g. adultery, intentional murder (or a planned murder), homosexuality and apostasy, and Allah knows best. These are the four mentioned in the Quran specifically. That doesn’t mean that drug dealers for example, are also not likely to be beheaded or executed, because they also are “killing people” by selling and spreading narcotics. Rape is also a capital crime, and the criminal is punished, not the victim.

The fact that someone argues against culture just because it is different is not okay, in my opinion. There are many diverse cultures around the world, and this is a beautiful thing. Therefore, the evil practices are the problem. But some cultural norms appear good in one culture and would appear the opposite in another culture. So, it isn’t always easy to tell, what is good and what is evil, is it? Isn’t it sometimes the opinion of a person and not really the majority opinion? For one, the reason that referendums are held is to determine what the public wants. Sometimes, cessation looks fine to many residents, but overall, the vote is in favor of not ceseding, as happened in Quebec , and also countries in the EU have had similar type referendums about joining the European Union, or about adopting one currency, the Euro. And so on. " Sometimes, the government or senate decides what is good. These are made using their onw judgement and by majority rule, but doesn’t mean they are right. Or right for everybody just because you think they are good. Maybe they are the worst thing. Interest isn’t permitted in Islam but the non-Muslim nations think interest is a good way to make money without having to work for it, because that’s what interest amounts to, money which you get on top of your capital (which you did work for). In Islam, interest is compared to incest with one’s mother. It is considered one of the worst things around because it doesn’t create wealth or bring blessings but destroys wealth and economies.

To quote Terente again,

‘“Also, random fact but Islam is the fastest growing religion in the West"

its that something good? no! something growing doesnt mean its autmaticaly good

and thats only propaganda! there are a lot of efforts to make it growing, if it wouldnt be like that, there wouldnt be convertions!’

He believes propagating one’s religion is evil, but we are not talking about forced conversions. His opinion is that it is not good and he equates freedom of religion and free speech practiced by Muslims (when they preach openly in public) as a kind of hate crime, but many people would defend the idea that speaking about one’s religion, as happens in London a lot, in the street Dawa, or he mentions CAIR defending Islam, is free speech, and should be permitted. These are opinions, but there is also the matter of the law, which may permit preaching in public. So far, we haven’t seen Muslims arrested in London for only preaching a peaceful message. Whether one believes Islam is really peaceful or not is not the only question. And there is no court in Britain or America that has ruled Islam as a violent and intolerant religion. Douglas Murray and others say it is, and their freedom of speech has not been curtailed either. But Islam has not been banned in Europe or the West. So Muslims are not breaking the law by practicing their freedom of speech right or associating with Islamic groups, like CAIR. If that will always be the case of if the nature of some groups changes in the future is another question.


Zaha S

Dec 1, 2013

What in the world do you mean what culture is that? Its apart of a terrible cultural practice in the Middle East I thought that was already established. Yes it is something good because it is my way of life and I see it as beautiful and peaceful and if more people embrace that lifestyle then that makes me happy. What propaganda? I'm still itching my head at your ignorance; I don't think you're an idiot though, just misinformed. There is no such thing as forced Islam and most reverts find Islam on their own. Ask me anything, what did I ignore? I apologize if I ignored anything.

She says he is misinformed but not an idiot – that’s nice of her. In fact, she is so nice, that she can’t say anything which would hurt someone’s feelings, so she doesn’t want to tell the truth, which is that there are “beheadings” sometimes a lot, but especially in Iran or “killings” especially in Iran. Also, Saudi Arabia Kills murderers and adulterers, or stones them, which is the same thing, in the end. It is not something we want to happen to anyone, but is the punishment for those crimes, per the sharia. People know that these punishments exist, and in Islam IF ONE DOESN”T KNOW THE PUNISHMENT FOR A CRIME< the he is not punished with it. That is COMPLETELY TRUE. I will even swear, it. Islam doesn’t punish someone for adultery if he says he didn’t know that the punishment for adultery existed. The judge is supposed to ask the person if he understands what he did, and if he knew that there is a punishment for it, e.g. did he know if he committed adultery he should be stoned??And KILLED??

If someone claims they didn’t know, and the judge believes them (there is no proof he did know), then he is let go. But the next time, he won’t be as lucky, unless he can prove next time that he forgot, and has a memory loss, which would need a doctor’s witness.

This means, not everything is as “obvious” as one imagines, or that not as many kilings are occurring as one might imagine should be occurring. Yes, a lot of adultery, but the punishments are not as many as the actual cases of adultery. I know this is true, because adultery must be proven with four witnesses, and this is discussed elsewhere in my blog. (I’ll try to leave a link).

Zaha has no problem with saying the Middle East has a culture that permits people to behave horridly. It isn’t about Islam, she says. So, insulting Middle Easter culture is okay, blaming Islam for “beheadings” is wrong.

Whatever one believes about beheadings, they are legal punishments carried out in Muslim countries, like Saudi Arabia and Iran. You can agree or disagree with the laws of other countries, but don’t lie that they don’t exist, or worse, say that the Quran doesn’t permit it. Also, it isn’t only Arab or Middle Eastern or even Muslim majority states which have capital punishment, beheadings might take place as well, certainly hangings are still practiced, and lethal injections and even firing squad are used in different places.

There are no legal slaves in the Middle East or the Gulf States. But I also would be cautious not to say that slavery is “forbidden” because the Quran doesn’t say that. It isn’t permitted in Islam however, to make a free Muslim person a slave. It isn’t permitted to take a Muslim who is already a free person, as a slave. He might have been a slave before, but once he has purchased his freedom or been emancipated by his owner or another person, he is free for the rest of his life. (If a non-believer takes him as a slave, is also something which would have to be discussed separately, but probably Muslims would really look down on a non-believer who takes a free Muslim or person as a slave, but that is what used to happen in the past to people.)

tvee

Dec 1, 2013

+Zaha S Thanks for your reply and explanation. I read an article in my local newspapers a few months ago, stating that a Muslim organization used an index based on (equality, freedom, etc) to gauge how compliant countries are to Sharia laws and surprisingly they have rated some countries (in Europe and the West) as more Sharia compliant than some Islamic countries. It was interesting. The study was meant as a wake up call to some Muslim countries to do more to tackle poverty, injustice, equality, etc in their countries. I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

There are no Muslims who call themselves Wahabis, this is a misnomer. It is a way to label Sunni Muslims, who are the majority, by the way. Sufis are not hurting anybody, but they are not following Islam as the majority either. You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends, who are all Sunnis. I don't have a problem with someone who practices how he wants but it isn't right to demonize the majority because you don't know Muslims well. Of course you believe so called Salafists or Wahabis are bad, because you believe everything you read about Islam (for the most part) is in the media. You can find many, many Sunnis on the internet and ask them their opinions about issues, and you will find that they also believe in live and let live. They are not out to get you or to Islamize the entire world. We are not ordered to turn everyone into Muslims against their will, it is a small majority of Muslims who actually think like that, or in terms of us and you. Also, I have Turkish women friends and they are just like me and my other friends; they care about the same issues that other Sunnis do. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

By the way, labeliing the majority of Sunnis as "salafist" or "wahabis" is starting to border on hate speech. Sunnis and Sufis all call themselves Muslims, and hardly do they get into discussions about their differences, except as an educational exercise. We are very united in our views and aspirations, but appear to be disunited; the media perpetrates the appearance of great schisms, which don't really exist (or result in disunity) among Muslims in their daily relationships with each other.

I should have siad, it is already at the point where labeling of sunnis occurs, and it borders on hate speech. This is something that has to be addressed in a public sphere. I wish more is said by othes about this problem.

In some previous statements by tvee, which are intersting, quoting a study, he mentions that a study showed that sharia is being practiced more in non-Muslim countries, and the index Does this mean that sharia is good, or that the West is more Islamic only? It appears that the fact that Western or European countries (according to what tvee explains) are more sharia compliant and therefore, also better. This is actually a good sign, then. I would tell +terente P to consider this part of +tvee ‘s remark before saying that Islam is “evil” ( my wording) or anything of that sort.

Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+terente P when you discuss so many facets of the religion in one breath, it is going to confuse. There are punishments for crimes, as you say, but a few countries are punishing some of these criminals, and it is in the Shariah, yes. However, that has nothing to do with the fact that Islam has spread to the West and many people believe in it. Arguing about the right or wrong of the religion isn't going to stop ppl from embracing it. Obviously they think it is good or they wouldn't accept it. The sharia is Islamic law and I don't have to apologize on behalf of Muslim countries which practice it. Yes, you can discuss anything because the internet permits you to. That doesn't mean that you are correct. Anyway, you should not take the spread of Islam as a personal insult. It seems you don't know Muslims well enough to have such a bad opinion of them. +terente P


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

Why do you want to be afraid of anybody, e.g. you say you are an islamophobe and what's wrong with that? +terente P Plenty, I think.


Jane Dughatir

Dec 4, 2013

+Zaha S could you review some of your previous comments, and think about revising? If you are a pious person, you should not say things which are not in accordance with your professed religion. If you are ignorant of your religion, you should learn more about it. You can comment freely to my discussion and I appreciate comments. But do be careful on the net how you frame your discussions. People are very conscious of Islam's power and also wary of it. We should always say what is right, no matter if ppl don't like it or even fight us about it. That is real freedom, not cowering under pressure of some islamophobes and hiding behind false platitudes. +tvee +terente P

Here I merely asked Zaha if she could review some of her comments. Hardly is that rude. Then “think about revising”. Hardly rude. I explain what is real freedom, “not hiding behind false platitudes”. Yes, I accuse her of that,because that’s what she did in her comments. Hiding and denying FACTS. The Qur’an is a book, it is available to read, and all the people know what it says, or they can certainly find a copy and research it.

tvee

Dec 4, 2013

Reply

+Jane Dughatir Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself and read my previous post carefully before asking anyone to "..be care on the net how u frame your discussions." I am well aware that most Muslims are Sunnis (85%), but there are Sunnis who follow a more fundamentalist sects/movements like Wahhabism & Salafism. There are Sufis in both Sunni and Shiite branches of Islam. I never once said Sufis are not Sunnis. I'm well aware that Sufi Muslims are not the majority of the total Muslim population, but they are a significant minority especially in a few Muslim nations. "You are saying wrongly, that they are the best Muslims. they are no more kind than my friends.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.



Jane Dughatir

Dec 5, 2013
+tvee I'm sure I was speaking to the other person Zaha S, but just included you as a plus one, sorry for the confusion, or if I made a mistake when I posted the comment. Peace.

(I thought that, first, but then answered him back. However, one or more post/s for Zaha also included a plus and his name, just to allow him to see the discussion; the comment about being careful how she frames the discussion was only meant for her, though I figured the others could also benefit from reading that. It was only in the comment for her and not in a comment for him. Maybe that’s why I got confused about his reply which included my comment to her and not just the comment about his remark, “Firstly you need to put a mirror to yourself nd read my previous post carefull”, was his reaction to my telling Zaha to “be careful how she frames her discussion”.

But I did read and understand his post - Which I will explain now in more details.

He greatly implies that Sufis are good Muslims, etc, but then says I shouldn’t say that he said Sufis are “nice”.??!! WHY?? He is also angry that I say he says Sufis are better than Sunnis, who (many of them) follow a sect or movement which is “fundamentalist” (direct quote – “more fundamentalist” read as “extremist”)

To quote him again, “.." U have put words in my mouth. Where in my post did I say that Sufis are the best Muslims. Where?!! You seem to believe you have all the right answers to counter argue Zaha S and Terente P. Reality check for you - 'Truth' and 'believe' is ALL a perception - one person's 'truth' and 'reality' is another's 'untruth' and 'illusion'! Say what you want, but don't for a moment try to put words in my mouth or arrogantly tell me what I 'know or don't know'. Peace.

Now the previous post he made, which has the comments I objected to originally:

"I'm an Atheist, but in 2012 I was in Turkey & I had a very beautiful conversation (through translator) with an old sufi master. The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread. Much of India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Indonesia, etc were spread by sufi missionaries. I saw through the sufi master LOVE, PEACE, TOLERANCE & UNIVERSAL BROTHERHOOD for ALL mankind! It is such a different message from Salafism & Wahabbism traditions which teach a 'us' versus 'them' world. I don't believe in God but u said in a post that the God you worship is the same as the God Christians & Jews and other people worship. That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE that REFLECTS your God in YOU! :)"

He (tvee) said the sufis are the best, right HERE (in the parag above and this one, which are his own words). The Only Islamic tradition he is bolstering in his comment (above) is the Sufi tradition. I was not direct quoting him, even when I said “NICE” and it was just a short paraphrase (so I should have left the quotes out) HE wrote, “The gentle and compassionate sufi tradition within Islam should be revived and spread” He wrote the above to Zaha, not to me. He praises her highly, “That was a beautiful statement of TRUE LOVE…” blah -blah -blah.

He really means it should be spread, because it has always remained in part of the Islamic world, so it doesn’t need reviving but only spreading. He wishes to have Sufism (so called “Islamic tradition” spread) dominate the Muslim world. To burst his bubble, that isn’t ever going to happen, and thank Allah!! A group (or government even) of sufis will do nothing to bring peace all over the world any more than anyone else can, and they have no practical solutions to offer that aren’t already offered by the sharia. Sharia is the only way to ensure that all people have basic human rights, if it is spread. Sufism isn’t going to spread, so we have to concentrate our efforts on teaching Islam properly, so that it does acquire the recognition and respect it deserves. Islam is the Truth and it is good. I hate to be too preachy here, but that is now my only answer to +Tvee, who abandoned the conversation, after calling me a kafir, lol.


I said: 

Dec 5, 2013

Yes, you implied that sufis are "kind" and so on, while the majority are then not. That's how your comment came off to me, and probably a lot of people would agree if they read it. That's the way I took it because of how you wrote it. So I'm not apologizing for that.I'm not trying to be arrogant, just telling how I see your comment. +tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, which [sic] you by the way gave a lot of praise for, so clearly you are not as educated about what Islam teaches as you are pretending. You both came off as a pair of ignorants, that's my opinion. How you wrote it, comes off as ignorant, all of it. And some of it proves that you are ignorant.

I should have "tvee the other comments were primarily for Zaha, [whom] you by the way gave a lot of praise for..." but I think its pretty obvious, just a slight error. (Revised - Dec. 7th)

Zaha S, asks:

Yesterday 12:15 AM
"What exactly am I being ignorant about?"

I will end Part Two here, and get back to Zaha's question in Part 3. Also, I will leave this thought, I don't believe what she believes about the sharia, and I don't believe that everyone's perception is another's  illusion. And obvious "truth stands out clear from error" (quran) Truth is not untruth, that  is just nonsense.
 
 And why bolster Sufism alone, there are good Sunnis, many of them (and I am not disputing the claim that most Sufis or even a good majority are Sunnis - they have many strange practices, but for the moment let's say they are Sunnis e.g. Hamza Yusuf is a sufi (or I think he is).  Didn't he also meet commendable and good Turkish people who are not Sufis, but practise Islam? Are they all below his expectations and only Sufis pleased him so immensely, he can't say enough (even in block letters) about them? I find this hard to believe. He is just preaching this to promote sufism, not becasue he loves only Sufis.
 He seems to like Zaha well enough. And even praised her in a similar friendly fashion.
 
I am not stating either that he said anything else bad about Sunnis, but saying that "salafist" or "wahhabi" (which is a misnomer which doesn't mean anything) are extremists is also something I take issue with, and very strongly.
 
(Please Read Part Three to Find out why... next. Yours, J D-N)

If she wore red, she would be LIttle Red

Zaha S says:  

+Jane Dughatir I don't really understand what I'm denying either?

(LOL< this is a common thing on the internet – I DON’T” UNDERSTAND”< I’m NOT an EXPERT< I haven’t’ STUDIED” – then MY ADVICE IS don’t say things off the top of your head, for GOD’S SAKE OKAY to be FAIR< she is talking about my statements to her ABOUT WHAT SHE DID SAY!!! , so we will stick to that for now)

“I don’t understand what I’m denying either?” (This appears to be my fault, lol, she is being contrary, and she means she understands what I’m accusing her of, but doesn’t agree that she said anything wrong.)

“It is true what you said about Saudia and Iran I never denied that, what I'm saying is their governments are not Islamic! No country in the world practices Sharia law perfectly. I also mentioned that crimes like those are punishable but not all by death, because at the end of the day you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives (of course some things like rape and murder are another story). Thank you for calling someone you don't know a weak Muslim and "little" I really appreciate that. I'm not going to spend my time responding to someone who insults me, especially a fellow Muslim. If you are Muslim yourself you would know that Islam preaches kindness. Once again M3asalama”

Well, since we are being forgiving, why are MURDER and RAPE another story?? OH, I KNOW, because also in the west, where she grew up, they are crimes which get punished; her standard is only what AMERICA agrees with. SO, we have to do what AMERICA says; that’s fine if you LIVE IN America, but MOST MUSLIMS DON”T.

But you don’t get to change the sharia, or lie. THAT’S A NO_NO on the internet, BECAUSE< no one will believe you if you LIE>

I don’t lie,(not only, but also) because then I will get caught and no one will believe me, EVER,, especially because I’m a “strict Muslim”; IF I LIE, I’ll have no credibility left!!

Some ppl however, don’t care about their credibility, they figure they are insignificant, and their opinions don’t really amount to anything anyway, (or maybe I am almost the only one who read what they said, so they don’t care – they just want to win an argument, by tip toeing around issues and playing with words), or “I DIN’T SAY That YOU SAID” nonsense is always USEFUL to confuse the discussion; the more confusion, the better to hide what they don’t want you to see, that they LIED and are covering it up, or trying to disguise it as something the other person said wrong.

LIKE MR T< stressing the word “NICE” as if it is a crime to paraphrase someone…YOU will see how ridiculous his ‘accusations’ are. (or even for me to put quotes around the word nice, “NICE” as if he did say “NICE” - and not other things which mean someone is nice. AND what the hell did he think that would prove?? That I didn’t direct quote him??

OKAY I ADMIT IT, LOCK ME UP & throw away the key, forever. I”D PREFER THAT sometimes to this kind of ridiculousness and immaturity.



I said:

Salaam, dear. No, you said the specific crimes that were discussed such as sexual crimes are not punishable and they are ([with death], I’m qualifying this now since I neglected to but I had said it earlier, but as she had said above, “but not all by death” – well, those crimes are punishable by death and she should n’t claim otherwise, does she write the sharia law??Is it her place to make Fatwas, about who gets punished; especially if she isn’t giving any details, just a general rule that “you need to forgive just like Allah SWT forgives” isn’t good enough and is lying. So is stealing [punished, with cutting the hand, and there are rules, but yes, punishment happens) No, Iran and Saudi don’t practice sharia perfectly, I also agree with that elsewhere and didn’t say she “denied” that, so why is she saying “I never denied that”, as if I had accused her of denying that [“it isn’t practiced perfectly”, I agreed and always agree with that statement, nothing is perfect, this life is imperfect and the Muslims and their practice of the religion will always be imperfect – BUT GOD doesn’t require us to be PERFECT, just to try to follow ISLAM to the best of our ability. (THAT’s why, unlike Christians, we don’t believe we need[ed] “JESUS, A.S, to die for our sins.)

I have to protest the way these two (and many like them on the net) point out to me what they said, as if I had “denied them” or accused them of something which they didn’t say, they have said enough wrong that I don’t have to make up other stuff, too…).

THEN I SAID:

“That's in Islam when a country properly practices sharia, which is why even though Saudi and Iran are not perfect models of Islam, they do have such punishments which have always been done in Saudi, following the way of the early Muslims. People read about Islam and books are easy to find, as well as some proper sites on internet. ..."You can't fool everybody all of the time." And you can't fool me. Yes, ma'a salaam. Islam also preaches knowledge of your religion. Even many non-Muslims know Islam better and defend it better than you do. “

The overall tone of her message is “YOU ACCUSED ME OF SOMETHING I DIDN’T SAY (this is utterly misleading and just a red herring attempt to make herself appear innocent) Brave MR T Also does the same thing. HE KEEPS BRINGING UP THAT “HE NEVER SAID THAT SUFIS ARE NICE PEOPLE?? OH NO?? And that is all MY FAULT because I placed quotes around the word “NICE”. SO, I asked him “YOU DON’T THINK SUFIS ARE NICE THEN?? BECAUSE HE HAD BEEN GUSHING ABOUT HOW good they are, not his exact words, and then said in the next sentence, that “SALAFIS and WAHHABIS”( who are ALWAYS MUSLIMS FROM SAUDI ARABIA) or the gulf – IN OTHER WORDS SUNNIS – are BAD PEOPLE, not his exact words. But you can read his exact words; I will post the conversation in full if I have all of it, or post most of it here, or next post

It would help if First, the reader can decide whether they believe that SUNNIS are really that bad?? How come they are so bad and all others, even the SHIA who are also killing and slaughtering MUSLIMS in Syria right now, by the thousands, including children, DON’T DESERVE ANY CONDEMNATION BY +TVEE, but the “WAHHABIS and SALAFISTS” DO??

I”LL TELL YOU WHY _ BECAUSE that is what he has learned on the INTERNET and in the MEDIA> he is always hearing about the bad SUNNIS (because no one on the internet or the MEDIA claims that these “WAHHABIS AND SALAFISTS” are anything but the MUSLIMS WHO ARE FROM SAUDI< or the gulf, or ARABS and practice “EXTREMISM”. That is the CLAIM< which MR T, like a good “SUFI LOVER” believes, just because it gets repeated so many times day in and day out.

IF the READER today isn’t the slightest bit open minded about this discussion, which will take some time, then THIS POST isn’t for you!! IF YOU ARE VERY GULLIBLE and believe everything negative you hear about SAUDI< which isn’t perfect, but so isn’t AMERICA or EUROPE perfect> then you don’t belong here reading my blog. QUITE frankly, the discussion would be OVER YOUR HEAD. OR IT WOULDN”T PLEASE YOU, at which point you will become frustrated or angry, and then call me “NOT MUSLIM” like the very mature and intelligent Mr. T (with an IQ of 128, wow is that very high? Congratulations, for your high IQ; like I care, or even believe you, lol. It doesn’t take an IQ test to know that you are an ignoramus, though!)

MR T< first off, almost from the beginning says he doesn’t know a lot about ISLAM. So, the first cute or nice –seeming girl on the internet who SAYS ANYTHING about ISLAM is his favorite commentator. HE (+tvee) GUSHES ON ABOUT HER (and the sufis).



New York on Islam

(The Libyan American girl/young person replies to someone else, who posted this discussion before me, he is +terente P)


Zaha S

Nov 28, 2013

"Ummm why are you listening to random supposedly "Islamic" groups? Just like the KKK don't rep Christians, these groups don't rep Muslims. Seriously you want to get a good view of Islam then read the Quran. Of course to us Muslims, Islam is the right religion but only for those willing to accept it. It is not going to be the dominant religion in the US because only around 1% of Americans are Muslim seriously why are you being such an Islamophobe? I'm so sick of people like you listening to propaganda, I bet you've never met a Muslim in your life. Peace and may God Bless You."



terente P

Nov 29, 2013

pls dont tell me that CAIR dont represent muslims, but start to fight against that CAIR and tell them they dont represent muslims/islam! :)) if you do that and will succeed in bringing them to stop their activities, then I'll agree with you!

1% of Americans are muslims, but exactly organizations like CAIR try to change that and spread islam in US (there are more of them)

i dont see anything wrong in being an islamophob. there are christianophobes in our societies too and the athiests refuse any kind of religion. everybody can form his/her view how they want. if somebody thinks islam is somethign bad, they are free to think like that!

propaganda is that stupid try to create a positive image about islam, what you are doing here too

"may God Bless You."

God! but not allah (satan)


(Zaha S, says back)

"Ummm first and foremost Allah is Arabic for God and lol I don't think you fully understand the meaning of "Islamophobe". I don't agree with these terrorist groups and most good pious Muslims don't either but they have power, money, and believe it or not the Western governments backing them up so there is not much we can do except use our voices. The only spread of Islam you're talking about is peaceful just like Mormons or Jehovah's witness' at your door on a Sunday morning except even less. Honestly the only thing I'm really concerned about is people looking at weird groups or countries like Iran or Saudi Arabia as models of Islam and thats the opposite no country on earth is representing Islam correctly unfortunately. So please please please as a fellow human being talk to a Muslim about our way of life, don't gather info from Islamophobe sites or people. Happy Turkey Day :)"

Reply (terente P, back)

+Zaha S

no matter what allah in arabic means! its about what are the properties of that allah and they indicate satan, not god. if that what arabs understand as god its actually satan, then is satan their god! worshipers of satan = muslims

you take the arabic meaning of god but tell further down saudi arabia is a weird country :))

you claim there are only some bad examples, but you cant mention a single islamic country where islam isnt bullshit - islam isnt peaceful, no matter which country we take as example

-honour killings

-minor marriages

-death penalties for homosexuality, sex outside marriage, apostates

-slavery

-oppression of women generally
....
we dont need spreading of islam!



Monday, June 17, 2013

The post before the post

I revised this Q/A and will link to an older post on the same kind of discussion; enjoy :)
Abe Lincoln's legacy will be in the next post, insha allah.


Q./A.

Good day Jane, thanks for the reply again. I hope you are well.

<<<

although I am an atheist, I was a Christian for 25 years. This is what Christians believe as well. They believe that God created human beings with the ability to know and love him. If God did do this, then it is expected that he would reveal himself adequately to all human beings, particularly if heaven or hell is on the line. But I don't think that we can say that God has done this. There are billions of people today who believe other things than you do about God/Allah. There are billions of people who have lived previously who have believed in the spirits and polytheism. What humans believe about the gods is complex and not totally understood, but it can certainly be said that the most important determinant in this is culture; when and where a person was born.

I also have some experience with the Mormons. One day after they gave me their book, I decided to read. After finishing, I found nothing to make me believe that this was the prophetic word of God. When I told them this in a follow-up appointment, they asked me if I had prayed to God while reading to reveal to me if it was true. I came to understand that these people had had a religious experience where they were confident that this book was inspired by God. I have had my own religious experiences as a Christian that convinced me that Christianity was the true religion. These types of experiences are common to all human beings and I am sure that some pagans had the same experience regarding Zeus, Thor, and Shiva.

It’s also quite bizarre to think that everything that happens is according to God's will. There are 9 million children that die every year before the age of five, before they had ever had a chance to formulate any solid beliefs about a deity. And millions of human beings have died before birth as a result of spontaneous miscarriage. Hundreds of millions of other humans are born with congenital brain defects, so hardly can be expected to formulate correct beliefs about God.

to my mind, these facts are inconsistent with a God that wants to have a relationship with human beings, but quite consistent with religion being a human phenomenon. It is unreasonable to believe that human beings who follow other religions are deliberately being wicked. There certainly are some frauds out there, but the majority of regular people are earnest in their belief. They are not deliberately rejecting Allah and the Prophet; they have just come to believe other things.

it seems quite clear to me, that this world is not governed by any divine will, but by cold impersonal mindless physical forces. This beautifully explains all phenomena in the world from tsunamis, floods, drought, the plague, malaria, birth defects, a world governed by survival of the fittest and dominated by survival of the strongest, the diversity of life. And suffering. IMHO, a loving deity who wants a relationship with human individuals does not.

. <<

my point about the four witnesses is that we have better ways to determine whether adultery occurred. It is not a very practical requirement for adultery because it's almost never going to happen. It is more likely that a rich spouse hired 4 witnesses. In addition three reliable witnesses could be enough. Why not five witnesses?

Finally stoning to death is a horrific punishment for adultery. There are many people who have committed adultery who have reformed themselves to become valuable citizens in the world. My best friend was one of them. If he had been stoned to death his two children and wife would've missed out on a great provider, husband and father. He was suffering his psychological issues at the time when he was in his early 20s.

My point about rape was that Islam has difficulty deciding what rape is. There are many people claiming to know Islamic jurisprudence on this who feel that sometimes the woman is responsible, at least partly, if she is inadequately accompanied or dressed. Apparently Islam feels that men are barbarians and cannot resist women.

Reply – many non-Muslims also say things like this, it doesn’t mean it is okay for a man to commit rape, and most Muslims know that rape isn’t justified because the woman is not properly dressed; many rapists are non-Muslims, I’d say more than likely most are non-Muslims. India at the moment has a big problem with gang rape; the question is obvious – why is it happening? Are all men "barbarians" after all?It seems men there regard women as objects, and many men may well be affected by drugs, alcohol, pornography, and so on. If they are not able to marry or have sex with women, they resort to rape, because it is a gang activity, I doubt it is a group psychosis, but a group activity which has gained acceptance among youth or men there. Obviously, the society has many ills if this is the case.)

in my country, rape is not very common. The vast majority of women live their lives never experiencing it. I think it is far more prevalent in poor countries, like India and Pakistan. Not sure how much rape is reported in some countries and as I said before, we can always make rape very unlikely by chaining women to their homes, but that would[not] increase the quality of lives for women. The vast majority of Western women value their freedom and the ability to make their own decisions.

Reply – Stu, you said you are from America or the west? Where do you actually live and call home, then, because rape happens every five minutes or even more than that in America. I think you are not telling me the whole truth…? I believe it was also, Stu, but I could be mistaken who said his wife was at the Boston Marathon or nearby, when the explosion happened!) Allah knows better than I.

<<

<<


Actually, when you read the saying, it illustrates that the Prophet was telling men, if they beat their wives they shouldn't sleep with them, which is like a deterrent.<<<<< I

These two above statements reveal to me that you believe that the man has authority over the woman. Do you think men have some sort of special knowledge and moral authority to dictate to women how they should dress? Are women so inferior that they need a man to tell her, with authority to beat her if she doesn't comply?

1) Yes, man has a responsibility to care for and protect his woman, or wife or daughters. 2) I was obviously speaking about the past (that men should beat their wives; is something not done by regular Muslim men anymore, which I speak about elsewhere, probably I mentioned this to him , so I'll check the details of other emails), which is 1400 years ago, if you would pay closer attention when reading, you wouldn’t be asking this question; I am a self-respecting and good woman, therefore, I do take care to dress modestly and believe many women would do so, if they believed it was for their own good; problem is many women believe it is beneficial to dress provocatively, though it is 2013, so they can find a companion who will love them; this is the wrong approach, but they think it will work. Women are raised from childhood to believe that their looks are the most important thing when it comes to finding love. Society also encourages women by the magazines, advertising, fashion shows, etc. to like to dress in the latest fashions and spend their earnings on clothing and makeup, and accessories, so they can be trendy and this will compensate for their feelings of ugliness, shortcomings in appearance or skills, etc. Many women are not following the crowd and are brainy enough to shun at least some of the unnecessary and frivolous spending on new clothing and instead care about more important matters. They also would seem to have more self-respect and dignity than someone who needs to seek approval from others. There are Western women who boycott products or companies they believe exploit women in sexually suggestive ways, or abuse workers (e.g. Calvin Klein becasue of its ads, is sometimes boycotted by individual women, others which employ girls in sweat shops). 3) “No” men don’t have “some sort of special knowledge” and I can’t imagine what you think that I or anyone would think that would be?? Women and men both have their duties to family, society and God. They will also be equally rewarded for their good deeds. There isn’t a huge movement among Muslim women to have the Quran changed, because they understand that Islam says they are equal in the sight of God and before the law. Women wear hijab (the Islamic clothing, a long outer garment or hijab and cover their hair with a veil, not out of fear of the husband, but in obedience to God, who demands it; if they don’t, no one should force them, or abuse them in any case. There are many uncovered women in GCC and also many covered women. Many women have grandmothers who didn’t cover in their youth, but their mothers began to cover and now they also may or may not cover; it is their choice. In Saudi Arabia and Iran women cover as per their government’s laws. In France women don’t wear niqaab as it is banned. Therefore, it is also governments which dictate the type of hijab. Even non-Muslims now can tell women how they should dress, which is definitely not a sign of absolute freedom of choice, either. Whether the government is Islamic or applies some of the sharia, or is a secular or democratic government, women are finding that they are being forced to demand their freedom of choice and conscience. All the power and God’s help to them, I say. Note that in Saudi Arabia, actually, not all women are forced to keep on the face veil, though it is something the government prefers (and it is the law - which is sometimes ignored) women do, as they are asked to abide by sharia law (almost but not quite in every area of life). No non-Muslims are permitted to enter Mecca, but other than that, they are free to travel the Kingdom, with visas. It is as other countries concerned with security so people are required to have jobs and place of employment or a valid reason for being in the Kingdom, or they can be expelled. One might see Americans as well as Indonesians or Chinese living and working in Saudi Arabia, and they do so with respect for the law in most cases.

[A famous female who works in television in Riyadh does not cover, this shows that she is not being abused because she is not covering though she knows it is the law. She also says she is intelligent and understands Islam, therefore the reason for her lack of face veil and the reason for her makeup and hair (she partly covers her hair only) is that she prefers to dress and behave in a manner against the Sharia. Yet she accuses the Sheikh of being extremist and against the rights of women. She should not defend her tendency to exaggerate the govt's crimes against her, when she is able to do so on national television and was not in any way abused (prior to her statements; in the video on YouTub). Whether or not she is still alive is for the audience to answer, I have no interest in the question or her campaign against sharia.]

<<

well indeed, some of the topics might be irrelevant. I'm not sure that slavery today is irrelevant in the Muslim world. There are some countries in the world that claim to be based on sharia who have not outlawed slavery. It is strange to me that God would condone slavery by giving rules for its management if he knew that ultimately these rules would be irrelevant. Slavery has become irrelevant in most of the world because all humans have come to understand that slavery is abhorrent. Concubinage and, for the most part polygamy, have also become irrelevant for the same reasons.

********

Allah permitted slavery in His wisdom, but He revealed to the prophet on many occasions the great reward for freeing slaves. It was also forbidden to make a free person a slave as per the prophet Muhammad’s saying (revise – find direct quote). Yes, it is absolutely the case that all people have come to see that it is a practice of past ages, and most communities, who are modern don’t even think about slavery anymore, because it is so far from our idea of equality and human brotherhood. Islam definitely had something to do with the almost complete eradication of slavery; as I mention, people in the more modern Islamic countries still today express interest to free the remaining slaves in such countries as Sudan or Nigeria, where people often live in desert tribes, away from modern life. It is likely some slave owners are Christians.There are hardly slaves in the cities or towns anymore, though one might be able to find some (How many? I can’t honestly say I know, nor do I think anyone knows, but maybe there is someone who can study this; it would be a worthwhile endeavor for some Islamic nations to do so, maybe one day, they will allot resources to this question). We realize that even Saudi Arabia is not a perfect model of an Islamic nation, and while some people claim that leaders such as Ghaddafi promoted women’s rights in their own country, it isn’t the case, but a false understanding of what he was actually promoting, which was the disrespect and enslavement of women (and men) to his ideology (a kind of socialism). He imprisoned many innocent men and even women and boys, therefore how could it be claimed that he was “elevating” women or promoting “women’s rights”? Nonetheless, Islam encourages freeing of slaves, people free slaves voluntarily or others pay to have the slaves released (pay the price of the slave to the Sayyid (master). There was never a racist attitude in Islam however, and slaves were not only black people. Therefore, it was an economic and societal norm (which was slowly changing) and freedom for slaves necessitated understanding of Islamic teachings; this knowledge spread very far and in the epicenter there were fewer slaves than at any time in history when the Prophet died and the love for his Sunnah meant that people continued to free slaves all the time. Perhaps in some countries this didn’t progress as fast and with the fall of the Islamic Empire, though there was slave trading by Christians (which continued even to the last century in a Westward movement, to America, which was also “necessity” because the slaves helped build the country and were used as cheap labor, etc. their humanity was questioned, and only until very recently in the West the law stated that black person is only 3/5 of a white person. The government (not the Bible) probably along with some encouragement from religious leaders taught that because the bible says that God put a mark on the son of Adam who killed his brother, eg. Cane killed Abel, which was taught in some circles or churches as the origin of black people. Muslims were forbidden from racism, racist remarks or racist attitudes and hatred of people based on race (xenophobia, etc.). No doubt this is in part why Muslims had no animosity or thoughts of enslavement because of race. In Arabia race wasn’t a factor in enslavement, but wars and the capture and necessary development of a system (long ago) necessitated that tribes and societies find a way to deal with their war captives without necessitating killing all the men and boys. People in communities must have thought of the need to use bonds such as chains, and if necessary beating with whips to discipline incompliant or disobedient slaves. Women were easier to control than men because they are weak, and obviously men liked to use women for sex, so that was also part of the social order in many societies long ago. One wonders how people in societies without slavery managed to defeat their enemies and avoid enslaving them. Did they kill almost all their enemies? Did they prefer to let them go after paying money? Or did they have to kill them because there was no other option, and their enemies would sooner or later come back to fight them again, with stronger more determined forces? Or did they make peace with their enemies so that there was no need for retaliation on either side, and how did they accomplish this? I can try to imagine what people long ago would have considered before either agreeing to enslave their enemies or to make peace with them. Even the environmental conditions, whether there was food enough for different tribes or nations (as in American Indian and Canadian native societies long ago, different “nations” or “clans” and “tribes” often differed or competed for food and grazing land, etc) It was probably a matter of survival that they didn’t take slaves but probably killed most of their enemies; maybe they also killed most of the women and children, which is the popular idea we have of turmoil in the “old west” between Indians and white people, and what occurred between many different native Indian groups (tribes or nations).

I definitely have no arguments (which justify) (for) slavery today (in most places) though, it is just that from a purely historical and anthropological perspective I can understand it much better than if I were to merely judge people - whether ancient or modern (modern in the sense that they exist today).

We don’t equate slavery of women with polygamy. It isn’t true that all people agree that polygamy is “abhorrent”, that is your own feeling and belief. Many women today accept polygamy, and I know some. They are happy as co-wives and I have even sat and visited with them, and gone camping with women who were co-wives. Something “abhorrent” would be unnatural, and polygamy isn’t unnatural, despite your dislike of it. You come from a Western or Christian background, so it seems strange and even a hateful practice, but that is your personal feeling and belief, others do not and shouldn’t have to live life exactly as you do, nor accept your personal likes and dislikes as their own; where is the freedom of choice which Westerners and Europeans always speak about? Where is the sincerity and humility? You say your best friend committed adultery and you forgive that, but you cannot understand why some societies and people prefer marriage (which is often a religious covenant and very serious and entered with necessary forethought and care.) There are also times when women prefer their husband to have another wife, whether you can find this even remotely possible or not. The Prophet taught that women and men should take care of their bodies’ cleanliness, to shower after sexual intercourse and to respect lovemaking as a God-given right for both spouses to enjoy, to fulfill their natural desires. Polygamy, like all marriage isn’t something dirty which brings to mind images of sexual perversion or abuse. Many in the west will shake their heads at Muslims or other polygamous groups, but easily fall into adultery, fornication, homosexuality, prostitution, orgies, wife swapping and other sinful, hateful, dangerous or perverted acts. Please don’t talk down to me, it is very annoying. You are not “forceful” you are a very biased individual, as you say “biased”. At times, you contradict yourself.



When you say Muslims have "progressed" do you mean that they have become morally superior to the Quran?

“No” they are not superior in their faith, general ideas, beliefs or actions to the early Muslims nor do they have any other teaching or belief system which is superior to the Qur’an; their “progress” is the same progress which most nations and tribes have gone through, e.g. they have learned to give others their due rights, to respect individuality, to be patient in adversity, to live side by side with others in peace, they follow the laws of the land whether founded on religious or secular laws (e.g. in the GCC there are Islamic family courts, and also secular courts, because not all residents use the Islamic courts and also, secular laws don’t necessarily contradict most of the sharia(Islamic law) such as laws against stealing, drugs, trafficking, rape, physical assault, littering, disrupting the peace, violent protest, etc.) There has been scientific progress, much of it long ago, in the Muslim lands, and now the Ummah (community) is in a state of limbo, with little developments (in science or humanities) for a long time, but there is some signs of small (and also bigger) movements to “environmental protection” as you asked, and other areas of development, social welfare, women’s rights, health and education, which is an ongoing concern, since schools opened in most GCC countries in the 1920’s or so. Christian communities also spread to the GCC from neighboring countries (their homes) and have grown and have their own community and activities. I mention also the support of community groups, such as the Indian groups or the Irish expatriates for their support of the King’s handling of the crisis during the “Arab spring” and protests which turned violent in Bahrain due to the extremism of some of the local people.

The rights of others are an ongoing question, which unlike slavery is always in some state of flux, while slavery has diminished in numbers for centuries. Human rights continues to be an area of concern or interest in general; most countries have some laws which some of the people are in contest with e.g. they want changes to them. It is natural to have conflicts within society as well as with other nations. The important thing to keep in mind is to respect others right to self-determination, that some societies will develop more slowly, and the world has a restricted right to intervene, especially considering that there is a lot of power in the hands of a few. Good should be clear from evil, if nations overstep the clear limits, as defined by modern laws in respect to human rights, then something has to be done; what is done depends on factors (all of which I’m not completely familiar with as a non-expert); the ability for the nation to comply, the situation on the ground, and any number of other considerations. Is it right to immediately invade a country because there is a suspicion that it has nuclear weapons? Is it okay to bomb civilian populations to root out terrorists in another country, considering that the terrorists are far away and no immediate danger? If there are signs or suspicious movements, when and where do you attack the enemy? Etc.

Besides international terrorism, what other significant problems are there, and why does terrorism get the most attention? There is child labor, can we tackle that question as nations and how do we get nations or companies which break the law, to comply with the modern and acceptable ideas of what is permissible, as far as children and work? What about the minimum wage? Do we dictate to other countries what the minimum wage should be, or is that a completely internal matter? How can nations do better to eradicate drugs trafficking and human trafficking? Why did the USA’s “war on drugs” fail? These are just a few of the very important issues nations need to think harder about and come up with solutions. If in an age when slavery was common, yet people began to see it as an evil, especially if racism or sexism was involved, why blame Muhammad, pbuh, for the timing? It is the way the world is; some people, merely due to the environment and their geographical position, e.g. the Sahara or Antarctica might have different ideas of what is right and wrong - maybe it is too hot and dry or too cold and wet to think about anything but how one will find food for the day or mend his house? Modern nations have a much greater responsibility to the rest of the world than did the earlier peoples and nations.(This is the answer to why God left in place a system which later on (much later, in America, they adopted slavery when there wasn't any on the entire continent; there was war and massacres, but no slavery)would be "irrelevant"; slavery hardly exists today, in practise and numbers; of seven billion ppl how many are slaves?  It is amazing that modern men or women who sit for hours in front of their entertainment centers can lob twenty questions about why a man 14 centuries ago didn’t eradicate slavery or amend marriage laws (actually, in some respects, he did both) and completely forbid it forever (because he was doing what God told him to) and yet, they have no qualms about buying coffee from Starbucks and equipment from Caterpillar. You’ve had since world war II to do something about Israel’s’ racism in the Middle East, but what have you done and how long will it take before you realize something has to be done? You want a deity who wants a relationship with you, will come down? God dictates the relationship; He sent a book, which you refuse to examine open-mindedly despite the proofs it contains, then you also reject God even though you once believed, merely because people changed the contents of the book you had e.g. the Bible, or because people are not living up to the dictates of their religion? You are like a child who doesn’t know how to think for himself and ask why about everything; try to formulate some theories of your own that can explain why slavery was or wasn’t abolished forever, 1400 years ago, or something logical (not emotional) about why men are or are not permitted to marry more than one wife. If people have anything new or original to bring to the table, I’ll gladly examine it, as for old prejudices and racist rants, I’m not going to entertain such questions. People can see my videos, comments and read the blog. If you have a question, be considerate of the wording and tone of your question/message or I will ignore it. – I admit sometimes I’m tempted not to ignore such questions, but it is better if I do.

I realize quite well and often vividly (my imagination is good) how people react to Islam’s set of laws, Quranic statement, historical events, and present day Muslims, including the extremism, but I don’t think people who believe differently from Muslims have to change. They have the right and free will, which Allah gave them, to do as they like and believe as they believe. But that doesn’t change my belief that everyone on this earth has the ability to know God/Allah, and that they just have to use their minds and listen to their hearts. That can be qualified; if their minds are closed and their hearts are full of enmity towards Muslims, so that they don’t want to listen, and refuse knowledge, then it is their own fault. I don’t call that Allah’s will - that is their own determination to reject Islam and the Quran. They “will themselves” to reject God, He is always open to their belief in Him. If they just pray for guidance He will definitely guide them, but they shouldn’t pray asking Him to guide them to something which they will only agree with for a little while, because in the future, they will likely figure out (if that isn’t what Allah sent - the guidance He expects all people to follow, not something that claims to be from Him, but is falsehood), and then they won’t find what Allah has destined for them not to find (because they asked for something and prayed for something which He didn’t send). Pray only to be guided to the truth, not a specific religion (other than Islam, which is the truth; though you don’t have to call it by name, you can if you want to) People often are certain that what they believe is the truth, but “there is only one truth” – for certain, one is truly astray when one believes in a falsehood, only a claim to truth.







Nonmuslims complain about immigration today, but there was a time, we vividly imagine it in books like Roots, when the west with Europe and the Arabs earned wealth by transporting and selling black people as slaves to the Americas; literally forcing them to go there, out of complete disregard for their wishes, or even families. They were, before that, free and made slaves. This is one of the practices of old which Islam prohibited – Muhammad, pbuh, said, “………………[editing] ….”


(I must apologize here for not providing a proper quote, it is just that I have many books, but don't know where the hadith/saying I am looking for can be found, if any Muslims (or even non-Muslim) reader can help I would really appreciate it, until I find it I am searching. [I had previously asked for help from an Islamic website, but they turned me down, becasue they only help people (non-Muslims) with dawa; I thought, I'm kind of qualified for their help, but they denied me, oh well...] I will take a break after the next Post, then I will have time to fix some of the missing references or indirect quotes, which need to be direct quotes, etc.(despite the previous setback, I have now found a female scholar willing to help me with islamic knowledge, and references, etc.)   Unfortunately too, I can't do much better as far as the look of the blog, no expertise there!)

DD