Wednesday, December 5, 2012

Islamic Book review

Islamic jurisprudence is the subject of the book, by C.G. Weeramantry, entitled, Islamic Jurisprudence: An International Perspective.

I will begin with an exemplary passage, though there are equally as many good ones, as I read through the book, here and there, noting down important points, and quoting the fine scholar. The author is a judge, a Doctor of Laws of the U of London, a former Justice of the Supreme Court of Sri Lanka, a former Prof. of Law in Melbourne, and former Judge and Vice-President of the International Court of Justice at The Hague, as is well defined in the inside front cover of the book.

With no further delay I give you some of the detailed or indispensable information which I found in this fascinating and timely read.

On page, 19, he writes, “Human reason was dwarfed by divine revelation.” about the previous experiences of the non-Arabs. Then he continues further in the same passage, “It was the Islamic philosophers who broke through this barrier and unleashed human reason (see pp.103-5). [See H.G.Wells (1925, the pages mentioned previously)]They thus set off a train of events whose impact on all subsequent thought was immeasurable.”

As an example of progress in the European’s later search for knowledge, he writes, “It was from the example of Toledo that Europe first learnt to understand that learning knows no frontiers, that it is universal, global and ‘human’, that it concerns mankind as a whole, without respect of race or religion.”

When he writes on the mission of Grotius, in order “for the commencement of the discipline of international law”; to read human history and to “extract from it a set of practical rules which mankind must necessarily follow…could not have failed to consider Islamic history. Indeed one of his observations was that the Christian nations behaved in war in a manner which compared very unfavorably with that of pagan nations”.
The author notes that several of the points he makes are not alone enough, but together paint a clearer picture, about which he at one point writes, “the thought and learning of a major world culture which had produced a developed jurisprudence of its own is scarcely likely to have been ignored.” Or …”would have failed to notice the only systematic writing ever produced thus far upon the topic”, p. 151 and p. 152, respectively.

Earlier he writes about how Islamic jurisprudence, or fiqh, had developed. On page, 9, “Since God’s existence was beyond dispute, His power beyond limitation, His oneness beyond analysis, Islam’s central discipline was not theology or metaphysics. It was the law (the Shari ‘a). The word of God, itself beyond dispute, provided a firm foundation of unquestionable scripture that closed off many metaphysical arguments available in a less firmly based system. The main question was the meaning of threat which was the unquestioned word of God – not whether God had said this or willed that or intended the other. Those latter questions were largely closed.”
     “Hence in the words of Professor Hamilton Gibb, the distinguished Arabic scholar who was Professor of Oriental Studies at Oxford and Harvard:

   “The master science of the Muslim world was Law. Law, indeed, might be said to embrace all things, human and divine, and both for its comprehensiveness and for the ardour with which its study was pursued it would be hard to find a parallel elsewhere, except in Judaism. (Gibb, 1953, pp. 4-22)”

Speaking about the great gift of political freedom, we read a hardly unheard fresh analysis of Islam’s push into political activity, with freshness and vitality here expressed in the original, sympathetic language of H. G. Wells, on pp 10 – 11, “Islam prevailed because it was the best social and political order the times could offer. It prevailed because everywhere it found politically apathetic peoples robbed, oppressed, bullied, uneducated, and unorganized, and it found selfish and unsound governments out of touch with any people at all. It was the broadest, freshest, and cleanest political idea that had yet come into activity in the world. (Wells, 1925, pp. 613 - 14)”

In short, law and theology go hand in hand in the Islamic system. “the term fiqh, or ‘understanding’, applied to this joint body of learning – understanding of the word of God and of man’s duties under it. The discipline of law rather than theology played the primary part in the development of this understanding, for law became the central discipline of Islam.”

Then it followed, that “Shari’a, or ‘the Way’, became the accepted expression for describing this discipline.” 

No comments:

Post a Comment